Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01420
Original file (PD-2013-01420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX       CASE: PD-2013-01420
BRANCH OF SERVICE: navy  BOARD DATE: 20140605
SEPARATION DATE: 20070412


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SN/E-3 (Seaman) medically separated for a left (non-dominant) shoulder condition. He suffered a shoulder injury in 2006 which required surgical intervention but could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his rating or satisfy physical fitness standards. After exhausting limited duty options, he was referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The MEB forwarded three separate diagnoses related to the post-operative shoulder condition to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E. The CI submitted a rebuttal to the MEB, which was reviewed but resulted in no amendments to the MEB submission. The Informal PEB adjudicated “6 months status post arthroscopic Bankart repair” as a Category I (unfitting) condition, rated 10% and included two Category II (contribute to unfitting) conditions: “instability with objective findings of a stable shoulder with somewhat reduced range of motion” and “still has subjective complaints of pain.” The CI was then medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “I am still experiencing difficulty with injury that required daily intake of pain medication and limited activities.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting left shoulder condition is addressed below and will subsume the related Category II conditions. No additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Naval Records.


RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20070305
 VA - (2 Mos. Pre-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Surgical Residuals, Left Shoulder 5299-5003 10% Surgical Residuals, Residual Biceps Paresthesia, L Shoulder 5201 20% 20070223
Subjective Instability, L Shoulder Category II
Subjective Pain, L Shoulder Category II
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
 Other x 5 20070223
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 30%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20070810 (most proximate to date of separation [DOS])


ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board acknowledges the impairment with which the CI’s service-connected condition continues to burden him but notes the Disability Evaluation System has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for anticipated future severity or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical separation. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veteran Affairs, operating under a different set of laws.

Left Shoulder Condition. The CI suffered a dislocation (anterior) of his left shoulder in a shipboard fall in February 2006, which remained unstable after reduction. In July, he underwent surgical stabilization (arthroscopic Bankart procedure). There is no documentation in the service treatment record (STR) of recurrent subluxation/dislocation or objective instability after the surgery. A physical therapy note dated November 2006 (4 months post-op), the last STR entry prior to the narrative summary (NARSUM), documents continued pain and subjective instability. Range-of-motion (ROM) measurements were forward flexion 150 degrees and abduction 120 degrees (normal 180 degrees for both). The NARSUM (3 months pre-separation) documented:
He says he has had approximately 50% reduction in his pain since the surgery but that he has chronic aching and that it is worse with overhead activity. He reports no new actual dislocations but states that he has a subjective sense of instability of his shoulder. He denies weakness.
The NARSUM physical exam performed on 17 January 2007 documented 5/5 strength at the shoulder girdle, apprehension with shoulder manipulation, but stated “His objective exam for instability is essentially normal.” The ROM measurements were forward flexion 160 degrees and abduction 90 degrees. The VA rating examination (2 months pre-separation) documented a complaint of “constant pain of 8/10 throughout all of the extremities” which encompassed all of the CI’s orthopedic claims, with no specificity for the left shoulder. Specific limitations were not elaborated. The VA physical exam documented the absence of tenderness or atrophy and did not comment on stability (subjective or objective). The VA ROM measurements were forward flexion and abduction each 90 degrees.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB’s 10% rating was consistent with the analogous 5003 (degenerative arthritis) criteria applied but did not address the NARSUM abduction of 90 degrees which meets the 20% threshold for code 5201 (shoulder limitation of motion). The VA’s 20% rating under code 5201 cited the 90 degrees measurements from the VA exam in support of its decision. Code 5202, which provides rating for shoulder instability (in lieu of other codes, not in addition to other ratings) was considered, but even analogously for functional instability despite the absence of objective instability, members agreed that application of 5299-5201 was not supported in this case. Furthermore, for non-dominant (minor) rating the maximum achievable is 20% via this route. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and conceding VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt) and §4.7 (higher of two evaluations), the Board recommends a disability rating of 20% for the left shoulder condition under code 5201. It is noted that this recommendation subsumes or takes into account any disability attendant to the Category II conditions elaborated above.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the left shoulder condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20%, coded 5201 IAW VASRD §4.71a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.
RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Surgical Residuals, Left Shoulder 5201 20%
COMBINED 20%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20130905, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record








                 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review






 MEMORANDUM FOR COMMANDER, NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
 DEPUTY COMMANDANT, MANPOWER & RESERVE AFFAIRS
         
Subj: PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR) RECOMMENDATIONS

Ref:     (a) DoDI 6040.44
 (b) PDBR ltr dtd 29 Dec 14 ICO XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
(c) PDBR ltr dtd 13 Jan 15 ICO XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
(d) PDBR ltr dtd 29 Dec 14 ICO XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
(e) PDBR ltr dtd 29 Dec 14 ICO XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
1. Pursuant to reference (a) I approve the recommendations of the Physical Disability Board of Review set forth in references (b) through (e).

2. The official records of the following individuals are to be corrected to reflect the stated disposition:

a.       XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC: Disabili t y sepa r ati o n with a final disability rating of 20 perce n t (inc r ea s ed from 10%) effective date of discharge.

b. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC: Disability separation with a final disability rating of 20 percent (increased from 10%) effective date of discharge.

c. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC: Disability sepa r ati o n with a final di s abili t y rati n g o f 2 0 percent ( inc r eased f r om 1 0 %) effective date o f dis charge.

d. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN: Disability separation with a final disability rating of 20 percent (increased from 10%) effective date of discharge.
3. Please ensure all necessary actions are taken to implement these decisions, including the recoupment of disability severance pay, if warranted, and notification to the subject members once those actions are complete.



 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Assistant General Counsel
(Manpower & Reserve Affairs)

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00097

    Original file (PD2013 00097.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    At the MEB exam and FPEB appearance, the CI reported pain in his shoulder and inability to do pull-ups. The only exam documenting motion limited to the shoulder level (~90 degrees for 20% rating) was the separation exam. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01199

    Original file (PD-2013-01199.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB forwarded no other conditions to the PEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated “right shoulder instability status post two shoulder surgeries”as unfitting, rated 10%.The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. Physical Disability Board of Review DEPUTY COMMANDANT, MANPOWER & RESERVE AFFAIRSSubj: PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR) RECOMMENDATIONSRef: (a) DoDI 6040.44

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00749

    Original file (PD-2012-00749.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated the right shoulder and left knee pain conditions as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. The VA rated the left knee pain condition at 10% using VASRD 5260 Leg, limitation of flexion of based on pain limited motion. RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation: UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00921

    Original file (PD2010-00921.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The “significant” bilateral ROM limitations described in the undated MEB physical exam were not consistent with the MEB “full” description of ROM, or ROM limitations described/measured elsewhere in the record, both pre- and post-separation. Given the CI’s capsular surgery and the left shoulder limited ROM below the compensable criteria for specific left shoulder codes, the 5019 coding was predominate for the left shoulder. The VA C&P exam was done after separation from active duty and in...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01740

    Original file (PD 2012 01740.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE: PD1201740 BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY BOARD DATE: 20130321 SEPARATION DATE: 20030529 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty Soldier, PFC/E-3(11B/INFANTRYMAN) medically separated for chronic left shoulder pain and instability w/existed prior to service (EPTS) history of shoulder dislocation in 1997. The PEB...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01626

    Original file (PD 2012 01626.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Accordingly, the Board considered the two conditions for separate disability ratings. The CI had painful limited ROM of the right shoulder, without evidence of instability following surgery. In the matter of the bilateral shoulder condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability ratings as follow: an unfitting right shoulder condition rated 10%, coded 5201 and an unfitting left shoulder condition, rated 0%, coded 5202, both IAW VASRD §4.71a.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01788

    Original file (PD2012 01788.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board must apply separate codes and ratings in its recommendations if compensable ratings for each condition are achieved IAW VASRD rating guidelines. Strength and sensation was normal.MEB/PT ROM evaluation17 September 2003appears to document reduced left shoulder abduction of possibly 15 degrees but is illegible; the NARSUM noted the PT consultation as abduction 110 degrees.At the C&P exam the CI reported pain, decreased ROM, and difficulty with overhead motion. Service treatment...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00532

    Original file (PD2012-00532.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW The Board further notes the significant interval (>3 years) between the date of separation and the DVA evaluation. The initial PEB rating and the VA rating were under the code 5201 (limitation of motion).

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01715

    Original file (PD-2014-01715.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Left Shoulder Condition . A permanent profile (U3) (dated 3 months prior to separation), documents the diagnosis of left “sub-acromial decompression” and “distal clavicle resection” and limits lifting to 20 pounds, with no push-ups or sit-ups.The commander’s memorandum to the PEB documents that the CI’s duty performance is excellent” but that his “physical impairments prevent him from fulfilling the requirements” within his MOS.At the MEB exam, the CI reported a painful shoulder. The MEB...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01522

    Original file (PD2012 01522.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    A rating cannot be recommended. In the matter of the contended postconcussion syndrome, right CTS, hypercholesterolemia, and blood pressure conditions, the Board unanimously recommends no change from the PEB determinations of not unfitting.There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration. Physical Disability Board of Review