Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00340
Original file (PD-2014-00340.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    CASE: PD-2014-00340
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20150709
SEPARATION DATE: 20071210


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty E-5 (Military Police) medically separated for right shoulder pain. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent U3 profile and referred for an Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). Status post right acromioclavicular joint arthroplasty was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The MEB also identified and forwarded hyperlipidemia for PEB adjudication. The Informal PEB adjudicated “right shoulder pain” as unfitting, rated 10% with cited application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. The remaining hyperlipidemia was determined to be not unfitting. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: Received two additional right shoulder surgeries due to military mistakes. He was not evaluated for neck and back conditions. His complete submission is at Exhibit A.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e. (2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.


 RATING COMPARISON :

IPEB – Dated 20070830
 VA* - (~3 Mos. Pre-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Right Shoulder Pain 5099-5003 10% Residuals, Status Post Surgery and History of Degenerative Joint Disease, Right Shoulder 5010 10% 20070920
Other MEB/PEB Conditions x 1 (Not In Scope)
 Other x 0
RATING: 10%
 RATING: 10%
* Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 80304 (most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] )

ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Right Shoulder Pain Condition. Review of the service treatment record (STR) found that the right hand dominant CI injured his right shoulder in 2005. Ongoing pain led to arthroscopic removal of the distal clavicle in March 2005. Persistent pain and the development of instability were surgically treated with acromioclavicular joint reconstruction in September 2006. However, this procedure failed to adequately address the condition, so a third surgery (revision of the reconstruction) was performed in March 2007.

According to the MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) dated 25 May 2007 (2 months after surgery and 7 months prior to separation), the CI continued to complain of right shoulder pain. There was no mention of shoulder instability or dislocations. Examination showed mild shoulder tenderness and some painful motion. Multiple tests for instability were normal.

At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam performed 3 months before separation, the CI reported right shoulder pain severity of 2/10. Although he was able to perform activities of daily living, he noted difficulty with overhead activities and driving with his hand on top of the steering wheel. He denied instability or giving way of the shoulder. Examination showed mild right shoulder weakness.

The goniometric range-of-motion (ROM) evaluations in evidence which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, are summarized in the chart below.

Right Shoulder ROM
(Degrees)
 MEB ~5 Mo s . Pre-Sep VA C&P ~3 Mo s . Post-Sep
Flexion (180 Normal)
 110/110/110 130
Abduction (180)
 100/105/105 120
Comments
 Pain limited ROM +Tenderness, painful motion
§4.71a Rating
 10% 10%

The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB assigned a 10% rating analogously to VASRD code 5003 (degenerative arthritis), citing application of the USAPDA pain policy. The VA also rated the condition at 10%, coded 5010 (arthritis due to trauma). The VASRD §4.71a threshold for compensable ROM impairment is “at shoulder level” (90 degrees from the side), and the ROM in evidence demonstrated motion above this level. Despite non-compensable limitation of motion, Board members agreed that a 10% rating was justified with application of VASRD §4.59 (painful motion). There was no malunion or recurrent dislocation of the humerus to justify a rating under the 5202 code (humerus, other impairment of); and no nonunion with loose movement of the clavicle to warrant the next higher 20% rating under the 5203 code (clavicle or scapula, impairment of). After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the right shoulder pain condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB reliance on the USAPDA pain policy for rating right shoulder pain was operant in this case and the condition was adjudicated independently of that policy by this Board. In the matter of the right shoulder pain condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.

RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20140127, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record





XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review




 invalid font number 31502 SAMR-RB                                                                         

invalid font number 31502
MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 invalid font number 31502 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for invalid font number 31502 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX invalid font number 31502 , AR20150013429 (PD201400340)
 invalid font number 31502
invalid font number 31502
I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:


 invalid font number 31502
invalid font number 31502
Encl                                                  invalid font number 31502 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX invalid font number 31502
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA
                 

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01810

    Original file (PD-2013-01810.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The “persistent left shoulder pain” was the only condition forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic pain, left shoulder, status post arthroscopic surgery”as unfitting, rated 10%, citing the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Pain, Left Shoulder5009-500310%Degenerative Changes, Left Shoulder, Status Post Repair of Labral...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02743

    Original file (PD-2013-02743.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pre-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Left Shoulder Pain (non-dominant)5099-500310%Residuals S/P Left Shoulder Surgeries5201-502410%20061114Other x 2 (Not In Scope)Other x 1 RATING: 10%RATING: 10% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20070404(most proximate to date of separation (DOS)). The VA rated the left shoulder pain (residuals, status post left shoulder surgeries X3) at 10% coded 5201-5024 (limitation of shoulder motion - tenosynovitis) citing painful...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01145

    Original file (PD-2013-01145.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Left shoulder instability, leftshoulder superior labral tear and left shoulder acromioclavicular(AC)joint degenerative arthritis were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB (IPEB) adjudicated chronic pain with instability left shoulder, with superior labral tear, debrided and AC degenerative joint disease as unfitting, rated 10% with application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00481

    Original file (PD-2014-00481.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board then considered whether there was sufficient evidence to support a 10% rating for functional loss (§4.40, §4.45).The MEB examination in January 2006 recorded a history of left knee pain “sometimes,” and the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01539

    Original file (PD 2012 01539.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Left Shoulder Condition . Treatment records supported findings of instability after surgical repair and an emergency department visit in May 2003 (8 months prior to separation) documented a left shoulder dislocation.The MEB physical exam performed 6 months prior to separation documented shoulder range-of-motion (ROM) of 160 degrees of flexion (180 degrees normal) and 160 degrees abduction (180 degrees normal) which was equal on the left and right shoulders. At the VA Compensation and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01693

    Original file (PD-2014-01693.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    invalid font number 31502 Service IPEB – Dated 20060316VA - (3 Mos. Chronic Upper Back Pain Condition . The CI was seen in pain managementprior to deploying for pain medications due to the chronic clavicle and shoulder pain.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 01187

    Original file (PD 2013 01187.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Left Shoulder Pain5099-50030%Left Shoulder Pain, History of Dislocation5202-502410%Other x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x7 Rating: 0%Combined Rating: 40%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20060921 (most proximate to date of separation [DOS]) ANALYSIS SUMMARY :IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. Chronic Left Shoulder Pain Condition . ...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01553

    Original file (PD-2013-01553.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The back and left shoulder conditions, characterized as “left shoulder rotator cuff tear, status post(s/p) repair and back pain secondary to T12 compression fracture” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01072

    Original file (PD2012 01072.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEWNAME: XXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army CASE NUMBER: PD1201072SEPARATION DATE: 20021213 He was issued a permanent U3 profile (131111) andreferred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB).The MEB forwarded no other conditions for Physical Evaluation Board(PEB) adjudication.The PEB adjudicated his shoulder condition as unfitting, rated 0%, with application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. In the matter of the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01323

    Original file (PD-2013-01323.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The PEB adjudicated “chronic left shoulder pain…”as unfitting, rated 0% with likely application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The US Army Physical Disability Agency made an administrative change that did not affect the disability rating percentage (the change merely indicated the soldier would be separated with severance pay). The VA rated the shoulder at 0% as well, using the same code analogously, noting that the CI did...