Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02466
Original file (PD-2013-02466.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX         CASE: PD-2013-02466
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20140820
SEPARATION DATE: 20080706


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (11B/Infantryman) medically separated for a back problem. The back condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The back condition, characterized as “chronic low back pain (LBP),” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The MEB also identified and forwarded three other conditions as meeting retention standards. The Informal PEB adjudicated “lumbosacral strain” as unfitting, rated 10% with application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The PEB further adjudicated the three other MEB conditions as not unfitting. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: The CI writes: “My award does not match my PEB”.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting back condition is addressed below. The CI’s contention is thought to indicate a mismatch between the MEB and PEB. Accordingly, the right shoulder, right ankle and deviated septum are considered to be within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board for review. No other conditions are within the defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20080307
 VA - (1 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Lumbosacral Strain 5237 10% Degenerative Arthritis… Spine 5242 10% 20080818
Chronic.. R Shoulder Not Unfitting R Rotator Cuff Strain 5299-5203 10% 20080818
Chronic … Ankle Pain Not Unfitting R Ankle Condition 5271 NSC 20080818
Deviated Septum Not Unfitting S/P Septoplasty, Traumatic 6502 0% 20080818
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 1 20080818
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 20%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 80930 ( most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] ).


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Lumbosacral Strain. The CI was tossed about in his vehicle following an explosion while deployed in March 2006. He was able to complete the deployment, but had light duties. X-rays of the lower back on 7 February 2007 were significant for early degenerative changes at L5-S1. He was managed conservatively with duty limitations and medication without resolution of his pain. A magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine on 18 May 2007 was normal other than a possible developmental variant. He continued both conservative management including physical and chiropractic therapy and also had injections, but remained without adequate improvement to meet full duty requirements and was referred for MEB. The CI was issued an L3 profile on 21 November 2007 for his back condition. No other conditions were listed. At the MEB examination on 21 November 2007, the CI reported right sided LBP. The examiner noted reduced range-of-motion (ROM), charted below, as well as tenderness and spasm of the lower paraspinal muscles. The commander’s statement was dated 10 December 2007. Only the back condition was cited as limiting duty. The CI was evaluated in orthopedics on 16 January 2008. No radicular symptoms were present. His gait and posture were normal. Spasm was absent. The ROM was normal, but elicited pain. The motor and reflex examinations were normal, but decreased sensation to light touch of the lateral thigh and calf was noted (side not specified). The narrative summary (NARSUM) was dated 7 February 2008, 5 months prior to separation. The CI reported daily pain with exacerbations every few weeks. He continued to take medications as needed and to do the stretching exercises recommended by physical therapy. He denied any sensory changes, weakness, or incontinence of bowel or bladder. On examination, the CI had no difficulty sitting, standing, or ambulating. Three maneuvers not expected to cause pain in his condition did so. At the VA Compensation and Pension examination performed a month after separation, the CI reported constant right sided LBP which did not cause any functional impairment. No incapacitation had occurred. On examination, the gait and posture were normal. Spasm was absent, but tenderness was noted along the right paraspinal muscles. Provocative testing of the spine was negative. The sensory, motor, and reflex examinations were normal. Degenerative arthritis was present on X-ray.

The goniometric ROM evaluations in evidence which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, are summarized in the chart below.

Thoracolumbar ROM
(Degrees)		 MEB ~5 Mo. Pre-Sep VA C&P ~1 Mo. Post-Sep
Flexion (90 Normal) 70 85
Combined (240) 215 160
Comment Limited by pain DeLuca negative
§4.71a Rating 10% 10%

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB and VA both rated the back condition at 10%, but coded it 5237 (lumbosacral strain) and 5242 (degenerative arthritis), respectively. This has no impact on the rating assigned. The limitation in ROM and painful motion warrant no more than a 10% rating. Absent spasm, incapacitation, or abnormal gait or contour, the Board found no route to a rating higher than the 10% adjudicated by both the PEB and VA. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the back condition.

Contended PEB Conditions. The Board determined that the CI intended it to consider the not unfitting conditions of right shoulder pain, right ankle pain and nasal septal deviation. The Board’s main charge is to assess the fairness of the PEB’s determination that these conditions were not unfitting. The Board’s threshold for countering fitness determinations is higher than the VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt) standard used for its rating recommendations, but remains adherent to the DoDI 6040.44 “fair and equitable” standard. The CI noted in the NARSUM that neither the shoulder or ankle condition was “significantly or permanently limiting.” The NARSUM also noted that he was doing well after surgery for the deviated septum. None of the conditions were profiled or implicated in the commander’s statement. None were judged to fail retention standards. All were reviewed by the action officer and considered by the Board. There was no performance based evidence from the record that any of these conditions significantly interfered with satisfactory duty performance. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB fitness determination for the any of the contended conditions and so no additional disability ratings are recommended.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the back condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. In the matter of the contended right shoulder, right ankle, and deviated septum conditions, the Board unanimously recommends no change from the PEB determinations as not unfitting. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20131115, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record




                                   
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review


 SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150001092 (PD201302466)

I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00529

    Original file (PD-2012-00529.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Low Back, Left Ankle and Right Shoulder Conditions. The MEB physical exam demonstrated normal appearance of the low back, right shoulder and left ankle with no tenderness. In consideration of VASRD §4.7 Higher of two evaluations, the Board agreed X-ray evidence, the MEB ROM and VA ROM with painful motion is more consistent with the moderate criteria for the VA’s chosen codes for the left ankle.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00226

    Original file (PD2012-00226.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the lumbar fusion L2-L3 condition as unfitting, rated 20%, with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Lumbar Fusion L2-L3 Condition . In accordance with reference (a), I have reviewed the cases forwarded by reference (b), and, for the reasons provided in their forwarding memorandum, approve the recommendations of the PDBR that the following individuals’ records not be corrected to reflect a change in...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02599

    Original file (PD-2014-02599.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VA rated it at 10%, coded 5237 (lumbosacral strain).The Board agreed that the evidence in record supported the 10% rating according to the current Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD)general formula for rating the spine based upon combined TL ROM of greater than 120 degrees but not greater than 235 degrees. Bilateral knee conditions . In the matter of the chronic LBP condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00533

    Original file (PD2012-00533.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 20% for the chronic LBP condition coded 5292-5293 which includes limited motion, pain and sensory loss in the right lower extremity. Both MEB exams indicated pain with motion and the right hip X-ray demonstrated degenerative arthritis. 5 PD1200533 RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows; and,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00079

    Original file (PD2013 00079.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Approximately a year prior to separation, 23 March 2001,orthopedic consult recorded a normal gait, normal reflexes, and normal motor exam; the CI indicated his pain and sensory symptoms had not significantly improved with treatment and requested surgery. The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) evaluation, 20 June 2001, approximately 8 months prior to separationand 2 months status post (s/p) back surgery, indicated the CI was attending physical therapy and continued to report back pain. ...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00327

    Original file (PD2012-00327.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated lumbosacral strain as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the Veteran’s Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Gait was noted to be normal. Although the VA C&P examination supporting a 0% rating was considered a thorough examination and was more proximate to separation, the Board does not recommend combined ratings less than that of the PEB.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00226

    Original file (PD2011-00226.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    CI CONTENTION : The CI states: “I was rated 10% and unfit to stay in the Army by the Army, but the VA rated my back at 40%, so I would like to get a re-look at my records and also I have been rated for several other conditions which the Army did not rate me for. Gait antalgic due to pain; no focal tenderness, no abnormal spinal contour, muscle spasm, or guarding noted; normal neurologic exam; all motions with significant pain; repetitive range of motion testing not attempted secondary to...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00130

    Original file (PD2012-00130.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI contention for radiculopathy with L4-L5 will be addressed in the review of the rating of the unfitting low back pain condition (as referenced on PEB proceedings document). At the MEB exam 4 months prior to separation, the CI reported, “back pain from C 130 hard landing.” The MEB physical exam noted mild tenderness at LS junction to moderate pressure and no overt spasm. The values reported were derived from the subjective pain threshold with motion and the rating decision stated, “an...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00756

    Original file (PD2012-00756.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RATING COMPARISON: Service PEB – Dated 20011231 Condition Code Rating Low Back Pain 5299‐5295 0% VA – All Effective Date 20020520 Condition Mechanical Low Back Pain Thoracic Dextroscoliosis Cervical Spine … 0% X 4 / Not Service‐Connected x 2 Combined: 10%* Spine, Mild Code 5295 5291 5003 Rating 0%* 0% 10% Exam 20020208 20020208 20020208 ↓No Addi(cid:415)onal MEB/PEB Entries↓ Combined: 0% *Low back, 5295, changed to 5237 at 10% effective 20050706 with other conditions added for combined 60%...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01489

    Original file (PD 2012 01489.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The CI made no appeals, and was medically separated with a 10% disability rating. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt) and §4.7 (higher of two evaluations), the Board recommends a disability rating of 20% for the low back condition and change of VASRD code to 5237 to comply with the VASRD in effect at the time of separation. Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX,...