Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01737
Original file (PD-2013-01737.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX       CASE: PD-2013-01737
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20150318
SEPARATION DATE: 20050822


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty E-4 (Computer Systems Analyst) medically separated for chronic left knee pain. The left knee condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty but was authorized to perform an alternate physical fitness test. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The “left knee lateral meniscus tear repair with persistent anterior knee pain,” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other condition was submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic left knee pain status post meniscal repair,” as unfitting, rated 0%, c iting application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: His condition continues to worsen and negatively impact his daily activities. His complete submission is at Exhibit A.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e. (2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.



RATING COMPARISON :

IPEB – Dated 20050511
 VA* - (~1Mos. Pre-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Left Knee Pain Status Post Meniscal Repair 5099-5003 0% Postoperative Residuals, Left Knee lateral Meniscal Tear Repair 5259 10% 20050727
Other x 0 (Not In Scope)
 Other x 7 (equals SC, NSC & deferred)
RATING: 0%
 RATING: 20%
* Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 51017 (most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] ) .

ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Chronic Left Knee Pain. The narrative summary noted that during deployment the CI injured his knee lifting weights and aggravated it a few weeks later while playing basketball. Conservative treatment did not improve his symptoms and notes in the service treatment record indicated that magnetic resonance imaging MRI) of the left knee showed meniscal tears. The CI had surgery 16 September 2004 for lateral meniscal tear (LMT) repair. Following the surgery the CI continued to have anterior left knee pain and despite physical therapy the CI was unable to return to impact activities. An orthopedic note 4 March 2005 indicated that the CI requested to have a MEB initiated for the knee condition and the exam noted tenderness of the anterior knee, without swelling or instability, with a diagnosis of residual patellofemoral syndrome. The examiner ordered another MRI, but there was no documentation in record that it was performed. At the orthopedic follow-up visit a few weeks later, a MEB was initiated for incomplete return to duty after LMT repair. At the MEB examination performed on 20 April 2005, 4 months prior to separation, the CI reported knee pain that limited his ability to run, jump, march, or squat. The MEB physical exam noted anterior knee tenderness without an effusion. Left knee range-of-motion (ROM) was 0-135 degrees (normal 0-140) and the knee was stable, with good muscle tone.

At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination 27 July 2005, a month before separation, the CI reported knee pain with crepitus with activity and occasional swelling, locking, and instability. He reported using daily anti-inflammatory medication and as needed pain medication. On exam there was a normal gait, without swelling, tenderness, or effusion of the knee. There was full ROM with crepitus, without evidence of instability or symptoms due to cartilage injury. Strength, sensation, and reflexes were noted to be normal. Left knee X-rays taken on 27 July 2005 were normal, without significant degenerative changes noted. There was no evidence of painful motion or additional limitation of ROM following repetition. At a VA C&P Joints examination performed on 4 August 2006, 12 months after separation, the CI reported frequent locking and swelling of the left knee. There was swelling and crepitus of the left knee on exam and ROM was 0-95 degrees, with additional loss of 5 degrees due to pain. There was no evidence of instability or semilunar cartilage symptoms with testing.

The Board directed its attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB rated the knee condition 0%, coded 5099-5003 (analogous to degenerative arthritis), and cited the USAPDA pain policy. The VA initially rated the knee condition 10%, coded 5259 for symptomatic semilunar cartilage status post removal. The VA rating was increased to 20% following the C&P examination 4 August 2006. Board consensus was that at the time of separation the evidence in record supported a 10% rating IAW VASRD §4.59 (Painful motion) and §4.45 (The joints), which note that “it is the intention to recognize actually painful joints…due to healed injury as entitled to at least the minimum compensable rating for the joint” and “factors of disability…considerations” include “pain on movement” and “interference with…weight bearing”. The Board reviewed to see if a higher evaluation was achieved with any applicable code. There was no evidence of limited ROM based on ROM alone; ankylosis; or, impairment of the femur, tibia, or fibula to provide a higher rating. At the C&P examination 12 months after separation, the CI reported frequent locking and giving way of his knee, but there was no evidence of semilunar cartilage related symptoms on exam. Additionally, the Board considered if there was evidence to support separate rating for instability and limited ROM in this case, however, the knee was noted to be stable at both the MEB and C&P exams. Members agreed that coding as 5259 was medically appropriate in this case and that at separation the disability due to the knee condition met the 10% rating. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 10% for the knee condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB reliance on the USAPDA pain policy for rating the knee condition was operant in this case and the condition was adjudicated independently of that policy by this Board. In the matter of the left knee condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 10%, coded 5259 IAW VASRD §4.71a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

CONDITION
 VASRD CODE RATING
Chronic Left Knee Pain Condition 5259 10%
RATING
 10%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20131023, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record









XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review 






SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , AR20150015862 (PD201301737)
1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 10% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00688

    Original file (PD2012-00688.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB forwarded no other conditions for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication. The PEB rated the knee condition as 5099‐5003 at 10% for pain “rated as slight /constant.” The VA rated 10% under 5010 for painful motion and tenderness. Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record SFMR‐RB XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, DAF President Physical Disability Board of Review MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency (TAPD‐ZB / XXXXXXXXX), 2900...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00142

    Original file (PD2009-00142.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Formal PEB concurred and he was then separated with a 20% disability for 5299-5257 Chronic left knee pain, status post repair of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) with tearing of posterior horn of lateral meniscus and tricompartmental degenerative change using the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Ratings Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Air Force and Department of Defense regulations. Using an evaluation completed two months after the time of separation from the Air Force, the Veterans...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00563

    Original file (PD-2014-00563.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Low Back Pain5299-523710%Chronic Low Back Strain523710%20050706Left knee Pain5099-50030%Residuals L/Knee Lateral Meniscus Repair, Chondromalacia Patella5259-501410%20050706Other x 0 (In Scope)Other x 1 Combined: 10%Combined: 20%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20050811 ( most proximate to date of separation) Low Back Pain Condition . The CI complained of dull constant pain in the left joint line and pain behind the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00989

    Original file (PD2012-00989.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records. The Board’s authority as defined in DoDI 6044.40, however, resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness determinations and rating decisions for disability at the time of separation. Right Knee Condition.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01087

    Original file (PD-2012-01087.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records. ** R knee 10% effective from 20031021 Service PEB – Dated 20021219 Condition Code Left Knee Pain 5003 ↓No Additional MEB/PEB Entries↓ Rating 0% Exam 20%* 20040320 Code 5010 Rating VA (12 Mos. RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00093

    Original file (PD-2014-00093.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01379

    Original file (PD-2013-01379.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    At the MEB NARSUM examination(approximately 3 months prior to separation), the CI reported left hip pain. President Physical Disability Board of Review SAMR-RB MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency (AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation forXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150006430 (PD201301379) I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00858

    Original file (PD2012-00858.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The conditions forwarded to the PEB were left knee medial meniscus tear and left knee patellar chondromalacia. The PEB adjudicated the left knee condition as not unfitting and recommended the CI was “Fit to Continue on Active Duty.” The CI requested a Records Review Panel reconsideration of his case and filed a 2 page statement outlining why “the findings are not compatible with the evidence provided and the condition I currently have.” The Records Review Panel agreed with the CI...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01982

    Original file (PD2012 01982.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The left knee condition, characterized as “ left knee pain and osteoarthritis, status post (s/p) arthroscopic debridement” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR40-501. The PEB adjudicated “ tricompartmental osteoarthritis left knee with meniscal tear/degeneration” as unfitting, rated 10%citing criteria of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The PEB adjudicated the three other conditions, obesity, hypertension, and allergic rhinosinusitis as...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00832

    Original file (PD2011-00832.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FPEB and VA each coded the individual knees at 10% using the criteria for arthritis (5003), with the VA indicating a traumatic onset by using code 5010. Left Knee : With regards to the left knee, the Board considered that the preponderance of the record supported the 10% rating for the left knee for limited motion. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: