Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00139
Original file (PD-2014-00139.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    CASE: PD-2014-00139
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20141212
SEPARATION DATE: 20080109


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty E-6 (Corrections Specialist) medically separated for a left knee condition. The knee condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). Continued and chronic left lateral-sided knee pain was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The MEB also identified and forwarded one other condition (chronic bilateral hearing loss) for PEB adjudication. The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic left knee pain” as unfitting, rated 10% citing criteria of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. The remaining condition w as determined to be not unfitting . The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “I was an MP and after my injury could not function as one. I told my MEB person who was handling my case that I felt my rating was wrong. I was never debriefed or re-integrated … never asked about my PTSD, my knee, and the two surgeries … cannot function normally because of my knee, I still endure pain. I wear a brace to this day.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.


RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20071005
 VA - (<1 Mo. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Left Knee Pain 5099-5003 10% Left Knee, Torn Medial Meniscus… 5010 0% 20080122
Other x 1 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 5
Rating: 10%
 Combined Rating: 30%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 20080 519 ( most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] ).

ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Chronic Left Knee Condition. The narrative summary (NARSUM), approximately 5 months prior to separation, noted the CI complained of left knee pain since an injury in 2002. He had additional injuries and underwent two surgeries where he had iliotibial band resection, removal of inflamed joint linings (bursectomy and debridement of synovitis) and repair of a meniscal tear. His left knee pain continued following his surgeries. His pain was constant and he was taking narcotic pain medications that limited his activity. He had intermittent giving way, but continued to deny swelling and locking of the knee. On exam , he had full range-of-motion (ROM), was neurovascularly intact and his ligaments were stable. He had notable pain with McMurray’s exam (for meniscal pathology) and deep bending. Radiographs were “unremarkable.” On the NARSUM addendum exam, approximately 3 months prior to separation, he was noted to ambulate with no apparent pain and no limp noted. On active ROM, left knee flexion was 125 degrees (limited by pain-normal 140 degrees) and extension was 0 degrees. The DD Form 2808, dated the day of the NARSUM addendum (and by the same examiner), documented tenderness to palpation, no effusion, no crepitus or grinding and stable ligaments. The associated DD Form 2807 indicated that the CI complained of knee swelling with continuous walking, running, etc.

At the VA Compensation and Pension exam performed 2 weeks after separation, the CI reported that he was able to stand for 30 minutes, walk for 1-3 miles, but had continued pain, a sensation of giving way and complained of locking several times a week. He denied effusion, weakness, dislocation or instability. The exam was notable for a normal gait, 0-140 degrees ROM (normal) with no additional loss or pain on repetition (negative DeLuca), negative Lachman’s and McMurray’s bilaterally and stable ligament exam without effusions. X-rays were normal.

The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB assigned a 10% rating under code 5099-5003 per the USAPDA pain policy. The VA granted service-connection and assigned a 0% rating coded 5010 (Arthritis, due to trauma, substantiated by X-ray findings). All exams in evidence documented either painful motion or complaints of knee symptoms following meniscal surgery that would warrant a 10% rating. There was no objective evidence of instability for dual coding of the knees and meniscal coding includes painful motion. The Board considered a possible 20% rating analogous to code 5258 (with frequent episodes of “locking,” pain, and effusion into the joint); however, there was insufficient evidence for that higher rating. Ideal coding at separation would have been analogous to 5259 (cartilage, semilunar, removal of, symptomatic) with a rating of 10%. However this alternate coding would have been of no benefit to the CI and analogous coding to 5003 (arthritis, degenerative [hypertrophic or osteoarthritis]) was supported by the NARSUM addendum exam.

After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the left knee condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB reliance on the USAPDA pain policy for rating the left knee was operant in this case and the condition was adjudicated independently of that policy by the Board. In the matter of the left knee condition, the Board recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.
RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 201, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record






                 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review
SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150008499 (PD201400139)


I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application. This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                       XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                           Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                           (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01924

    Original file (PD-2013-01924.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I was just rated for knee and two knee surgeries. RATING COMPARISON : IPEB – Dated 20050810VA* -Based on Service Treatment Records(STR)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Left Knee Pain…5099-500320%Osteoarthritis, Left Knee, Status Post Two ArthroscopicSurgeries501010%STROther x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x 1 RATING: 20%RATING: 10% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20060628(most proximate to date of separation (DOS)). BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00688

    Original file (PD2012-00688.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB forwarded no other conditions for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication. The PEB rated the knee condition as 5099‐5003 at 10% for pain “rated as slight /constant.” The VA rated 10% under 5010 for painful motion and tenderness. Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record SFMR‐RB XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, DAF President Physical Disability Board of Review MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency (TAPD‐ZB / XXXXXXXXX), 2900...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02156

    Original file (PD-2013-02156.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    RATING COMPARISON : Service IPEB – Dated 20031020VA*ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Left Knee Pain5099-50030%Residuals Left Knee Arthroscopy w/ RPPS*10%*Other X 0 (Not in Scope)Other VA Ratings: RAD 30%; R Knee 10%; L Wrist 0% Combined: 0%Combined: 50% No VA rating decisions nor the Compensation and Pension (C&P) evaluationswere in evidence. DoDI 6040.44 provides for consideration of post-separation VA findings, particularly within 12 months of separation, although the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00832

    Original file (PD2011-00832.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FPEB and VA each coded the individual knees at 10% using the criteria for arthritis (5003), with the VA indicating a traumatic onset by using code 5010. Left Knee : With regards to the left knee, the Board considered that the preponderance of the record supported the 10% rating for the left knee for limited motion. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00563

    Original file (PD-2014-00563.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Low Back Pain5299-523710%Chronic Low Back Strain523710%20050706Left knee Pain5099-50030%Residuals L/Knee Lateral Meniscus Repair, Chondromalacia Patella5259-501410%20050706Other x 0 (In Scope)Other x 1 Combined: 10%Combined: 20%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20050811 ( most proximate to date of separation) Low Back Pain Condition . The CI complained of dull constant pain in the left joint line and pain behind the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01390

    Original file (PD-2013-01390.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Left Knee Condition . The range-of-motion (ROM) was flexion to 140 degrees (normal).There is one physical therapy note in the STR from September 2004 (after the NARSUM, 5 weeks prior to separation) which states “popping gone/clunking gone” (indicating pre-operative signs of loose cartilage had resolved); it also documents a normal gait with “mild” tenderness as the only positive finding, with nodocumentation of effusion, cartilage signs or instability.The VA Compensation and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00926

    Original file (PD 2012 00926.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the right knee condition as unfitting, rated 10%, citing criteria of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. In the matter of the chronic right knee pain condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20%, coded 5099-5258 IAW VASRD §4.71a. RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation: UNFITTING...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00762

    Original file (PD 2012 00762.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY CASE NUMBER: PD1200762 SEPARATION DATE: 20030509 BOARD DATE: 20121114 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-5 (95B10, Military Policeman), medically separated for chronic right knee pain status post arthroscopic surgery. The MEB physical exam noted tenderness, a trace effusion and no...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02134

    Original file (PD-2014-02134.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Left Knee Condition . (Normal: 140 and 0 degrees).On an orthopedic exam on 7 May 2001, surgical incisions were well healed and the knee had no lateral instability (varus/valgus) but mild “laxity” at the ACL repair site (1A Lachman test).At the MEB/NARSUM evaluationon 25 June 2001, 4 months prior to separation, the CI reported a continued inability to walk or run without knee pain. Mild anterior laxity was again noted (1A Lachman test).ROM results are in the chart below.On the DD Form 2808...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01921

    Original file (PD-2012-01921.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB also identified and forwarded history of cellulitis, left knee, chronic bilateral hip pain secondary to bilateral iliotibial band friction syndrome, chronic mechanical low back pain, mild (less than a centimeter) left shorter than right limb length discrepancy, and mild bilateral pes planus conditions.The PEBadjudicated “left patellofemoral pain with secondary chronic left knee pain” as unfitting, rated 10%, with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating...