Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01455
Original file (PD-2013-01455.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX     CASE: PD-2013-01455
BRANCH OF SERVICE: AIR FORCE     BOARD DATE: 20140911
SEPARATION DATE: 20041206


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SSgt/E-5 (3P0/Security Forces) medically separated for epilepsy. The epilepsy condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of her Air Force Specialty. She was issued a P4 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The epilepsy condition, characterized as “generalized epilepsy,” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AFI 48-123. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated “generalized epilepsy” as unfitting, rated 10%, citing criteria of the Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 1332.39 and Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “I had planned to stay in the military until retirement. I was devastated when I got medically separated for epilepsy. My disability rating was 20% and I already felt like that was not enough. Then to my surprise they reduced the disability to 10%. I feel that was completely wrong. I have to take medicine twice a day and go see my neurologist once a year. I feel my disability should be higher and that it was wrong for them to reduce it from 20% to 10 %.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting epilepsy condition is addressed below and no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records. The Board acknowledges the CI’s information regarding Department of Veteran Affairs (DAV) compensation rating change from 20% to 10% for epilepsy; but, must emphasize that the Disability Evaluation System has neither the role nor the authority to address DAV compensation claims. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the DAV under a different set of laws.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20041007
 VA - (3.5 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Generalized Epilepsy 8910 10% Generalized Epilepsy 8910 20% 20041206
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 4 (Not in Scope) 20041206
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 20%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 50119 ( most proximate to date of separation ).




ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Generalized Epilepsy Condition. While shopping in June 2004, the CI was observed to have an unprovoked period of unconsciousness with tonic-clonic (jerking-like) seizure activity. Witness described her with pre-seizure dizziness, two minutes of jerking movements and 20 to 45 minutes of confusion. There was no associated vomiting or bowel/urine incontinence. A cardiology work-up was normal. A computer tomography (CT) of the head was normal. An electroencephalogram (monitor of brain electrical activity) revealed abnormal tracings suggestive of a generalized seizure disorder. On 22 July 2004, neurology definitively diagnosed generalized epilepsy syndrome, single generalized tonic-clonic seizure and initiated anti-seizure medication. A P3 temporary profile was issued with the following limitations: “…may not carry a firearm or driving until profile expires.” The commander’s statement corroborated the above historical review and limitations in addition documented that the profile impeded her from meeting deployment obligations. At the MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) examination on 8 September 2004 (3 months prior to separation), the CI summarized her initial event with a denial of any past history or antecedent illness or injury. An in-depth, neurologically focused physical examination was normal. Her diagnosis remained generalized epilepsy. Her prognosis was listed as “guarded.” There was no original VA C&P examination contained in the case file, but the original VARD referenced the missing examination citing the history of a single major seizure in the last year for a 20% impairment rating.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB and VA chose the same coding option, 8910 (epilepsy, grand mal), for the condition and both were IAW §4.124a, schedule of ratings neurological conditions and convulsive disorders. The PEB rated 10% citing no specific rating criteria other than IAW DoD and VASRD guidelines. The VA rated 20% based on a “single major seizure in the last year.” A higher evaluation of 40% was not warranted unless there was evidence of at least a major seizure in the last 6 months or two in the last year, or averaging at least five to eight minor seizures weekly. Having no evidence of any minor seizure activity or activity onset greater than a year prior to service separation, the Board strictly focused on the time interval from seizure onset to separation knowing its impact on the recommendation of a higher impairment rating. The difference between the 20% and 40% VASRD criteria for a single major seizure is the occurrence within 6 months or later from the time of separation. This case hovers very near to the 6-month cut-off and therefore, the Board carefully considered and calculated the time interval after symptom onset. Strictly, by the time interval number of days, the higher rating was not supported by a margin of 7 days. Board members carefully considered §4.7 (higher of two evaluations) which states, “Where there is a question as to which of two evaluations shall be applied, the higher evaluation will be assigned if the disability picture more nearly approximates the criteria required for that rating. Otherwise, the lower rating will be assigned.” Member’s concluded that the overall disability picture in this case, as evidenced by a single seizure, most closely relates to the lower rating. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 20% for the seizure disorder condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the seizure condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20%, coded 8910 IAW VASRD §4.124a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.

RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of her prior medical separation.

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Generalized Epilepsy 8910 20%
COMBINED 20%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20130913, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record






                 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review


 SAF/MRB
Dear XXXXXXXXXXXXXX:
         Reference your application submitted under the provisions of DoDI 6040.44 (Title 10 U.S.C. § 1554a), PDBR Case Number PD-2013-01455.

         After careful consideration of your application and treatment records, the Physical Disability Board of Review determined that the rating assigned at the time of final disposition of your disability evaluation system processing was not appropriate under the guidelines of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities. Accordingly, the Board recommended modification of your assigned disability rating without re-characterization of your separation with severance pay.

         I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board. I concur with that finding, accept their recommendation and direct that your records be corrected as set forth in the attached copy of a Memorandum for the Chief of Staff, United States Air Force. The office responsible for making the correction will inform you when your records have been changed.

                                                               Sincerely,



                                                              
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
Attachments:
1. Directive
2. Record of Proceedings

cc:
SAF/MRBR

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02214

    Original file (PD-2013-02214.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The examiner noted there had not been any additional seizures since February 2005.The VA Compensation & Pension (C&P) examination on 26 October 2005, approximately 3 months after separation, recorded the last seizure occurred in July 2005, and that the CI“has had a seizure once every one and a half years.” However, the CI noted he had not had another grand mal seizure since February 2005 but had experienced episodes of jerking of his right arm and some blackouts for a few minutes, but...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02427

    Original file (PD-2013-02427.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The MEB forwarded “nocturnal epilepsy”to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) as medically unacceptable IAW AR 40-501.No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The PEBadjudicated “nocturnal seizures requiring anti-convulsant medication” as unfitting, rated 10%with likely application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01335

    Original file (PD2012 01335.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was issued a permanent P3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB).The epilepsy condition, characterized as partial onset epilepsy with secondary generalization was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501 as medically unacceptable.No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The PEBadjudicated partial onset epilepsy with secondary generalization as unfitting and rated 20% with application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02627

    Original file (PD-2013-02627.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SEPARATION DATE: 20050902 The rating for the unfitting seizure disorder condition is addressed below. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and defaulting to VASRD §4.3, the Board recommends a 20% rating for the seizure disorder; proposing code 8910 (epilepsy, grand mal) for its clinical compatibility.The Category III demyelinating disorder was, more likely than not, the cause of the seizure disorder; but, in itself was manifested only by the seizures as rated above.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00140

    Original file (PD2012-00140.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The MEB forwarded epilepsy with breakthrough seizures on therapeutic levels of medications as medically unacceptable IAW AR 40-501. In the matter of the seizure disorder condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20%, coded 8910 IAW VASRD §4.124. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00622

    Original file (PD2009-00622.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    VASRD criteria for rating epilepsy are based on the frequency of major or minor seizures. At the time of the October 31, 2005 Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination, approximately six months before TDRL reevaluation in 2006, the CI reported experiencing four seizures: one seizure in April 2004, May 2004, October 20, 2004, and in early January 2005, with no seizures between January 2005 and the VA C&P examination. The Board must determine the most appropriate fit with VASRD §4.124a...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01708

    Original file (PD2013 01708.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB also identified and forwarded seven other conditions for PEB adjudication one of which was a MH condition of adjustment disorder, meeting retention standards. The Board reviews medical records and other available evidence to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, using VASRD standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation; and, to review those fitness determinations within its scope (as elaborated above) consistent with performance-based criteria in...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00633

    Original file (PD2009-00633.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    I recommend that this officer be released from his service obligation via a medical discharge.’ On 20040316 the CI’s case met a LIMITED DUTY BOARD which determined the CI be placed on an 8 month Limited Duty Board during which time a workup will be undertaken for his seizure disorder. After careful consideration of all available information the Board unanimously determined that the CI’s seizure disorder is appropriately rated as 8910 Primary Generalized Seizure Disorder at 10% disability...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00011

    Original file (PD2012-00011.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The VA chose code 8911 (epilepsy, petit mal) and rated 40% defined as at least 1 major seizure in the last 6 months or 2 in the last year; or averaging at least five to eight minor seizures weekly based on the CI report that the seizures occur without warning and occur approximately once every 6 months. The challenge before the Board was to evaluate the hard subjective evidence and consider the tally of the CI’s major and minor seizure activity in order to apply the appropriate VASRD code...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00442

    Original file (PD2012-00442.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Although the VA assumed the occurrence of five seizures during the year prior to the VA examination, this frequency was not deemed to average “at least 1 major seizure in 4 months over the last year,” and thus did not justify a 60% rating. In the matter of the generalized seizure disorder condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20%, coded 8910 IAW VASRD §4.124a. Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment...