Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01399
Original file (PD-2013-01399.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX     CASE: PD -20 1 3 - 0 1399
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army   BOARD DATE: 2014 1217
Separation Date: 20050303


SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an activated National Guard E-5 (Helicopter Repairer) medically separated for a back condition. The back condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS). The profile allowed for an alternate aerobic event to satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). “Left lower extremity radiculopathy,” “left lower extremity paresthesia, moderate,” and “L5-S1 herniated nucleus pulposus [HNP] (of left paracentral), moderate” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The Informal PEB adjudicated chronic back pain with left lower extremity (LLE) symptoms with limitations in range-of-motion (ROM) by pain as unfit and existed prior to service (EPTS). The CI appealed to the Formal PEB which adjudicated the condition as unfitting, rated 10%; and the CI was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION : “VA found the rating to be 30%.”


 SCOPE OF REVIEW : The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting back condition is addressed below; and, no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any other conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service FPEB – Dated 20050131
 VA - (3.5 Months Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Back Pain with LLE Symptoms 5243 10% LLE Radiculopathy with Paresthesia’s, Herniated Disc, Lumbar Spine 8620 20% 20050618
Herniated Disc, Lumbar Spine 5243 10% 20050618
Other x 0
 Other x 0
Rating: 10%
 Combined Rating: 30%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20050825 (most proximate to date of separation [DOS])


ANALYSIS SUMMARY : IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. The Board’s role is thus confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, compared to VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation.
Chronic Back Pain with L eft L ower E xtremity Symptoms . The CI developed back pain which radiated down his left leg in July 2003 during a c ommander’s run. He sought care with a civilian specialist who administered a series of three epidural steroid injections which resolved the pain. The CI continued to have left lower extremity radicula r pain and was seen by Primary C are for reevaluation. The physical exams consistently demonstrated normal bilateral strength, reflexes and sensation; however , there was a positive straight leg raise ( SLR ) on the left. A lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging ( MRI ) demonstrated a large left posterior disc herniation at L5-S1, with spinal, lateral recess and neural foraminal stenosis. The CI was evaluated by Orthopedics and noted to have no weakness in the bilateral lower extremities, however there continued to be a finding of a positive left straight leg raise. The examiner diagnosed L5-S1 HNP . The CI presented to Pri mary C are for a recurrence of back pain with decreased ROM secondary to pain which radiated to his left leg. There were physical exam findings of lower back tenderness, decreased ROM, a positive Romberg test and decreased ROM in the left leg. The examiner placed the CI on Quarters for 48 hours with specific restrictions of no flying, march ing , formation or p hysical therapy for 48 hours. A repeat lumbar spine MRI demonstrated a moderately large left paracentral disc protrusion which caused moderate spinal canal narrowing on the left with mild left sided neural foraminal narrowing. The e lectromyelogram (EMG) demonstrated a normal test with no findings consistent with radiculopathy. The MEB n arrative s ummary (NARSUM) exam approximately 9 months prior to separation documented that the CI’s back pain with a left S1 radicul ar symptoms was refractory to conservative treatment. There was no physical exam done at th at ti me. The CI was given a permanent P3 / L3 p rofile for left lumbar HNP L5-S1 with radiculopathy . The c ommander’s s tatement indicated the CI ’s medical condition rend ered him unable to perform his MOS duties. The MEB NARSUM a ddendum exam approximately 6 months prior to separation documented the CI had chronic lower back pain with radiating pain to the left lower activity. The MEB NARSUM a ddendum physical exam findings are summarized in the chart below . The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam approximately 4 months after separation documented worsening low back throbbing, achy pain that radiated to the back of the CI’s left buttocks, leg and knee. The VA C&P physical exam findings are summarized below .

There were three goniometric ROM evaluations in evidence, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation; as summarized in the chart below.

Thoracolumbar ROM (Degrees) MEB ~ 5. 5 Mo s . Pre-Sep PT ~3 Mo s . Pre-Sep VA C&P ~ 3. 5 Mo s . Post-Sep
Flexion (90 Normal) 90 6 5 90
Combined (240) 2 20 190 240
Comment Pos. painful motion & antalgic gait; Normal strength & reflexes; Slight decreased sensation left lateral thigh; Pos. straight leg raise (SLR) on left, neg. on right Pos. painful motion Pos. painful motion & antalgic gait ; Pos. SLR on left; Normal strength & reflexes
§4.71a Rating 10% (FPEB 10%) 10% 10% (VA 1 0%)
invalid font number 31502
The Board direct ed attenti on to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence . The PEB coded the c hronic b ack p ain with LLE s ymptoms condition 5243 (i ntervertebral disc syndrome ), rated 10%. The VA also used code 5243 for the LLE r adiculopathy with p aresthesia’s a ssociated with herniated d isc, l umbar s pine condition , rated 10%. The VA also rated the left sided radicular symptoms at 20% using code 8620 ( neuritis of the sciatic nerve ) . Board precedent is for a function al impairment tied to fitness as the requirement to support a recommendation for addition of a peripheral nerve rating at separation. The pain component of a radiculopathy is subsumed under the general spine rating as specified in §4.71a. The sensory component in this case has no functional implications. There was no motor impairment documented and an EMG performed was normal. Since no evidence of functional impairment exists in this case, the Board cannot support a recommendation for additional rating based on peripheral nerve impairment. All exams present for review documented thoracolumbar ROM measurements were consistent with the 10% rating. The Board reviewed the evidence in consideration of rating the intervertebral disc syndrome based on incapacitating episodes. The evidence documented the CI had been placed on quarters for greater than one week but less than 2 weeks in the year prior to separation. That also corresponds to a 10% rating based on incapacitating episodes. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the c hronic b ack p ain with LLE s ymptoms .


BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the c hronic b ack p ain with l eft l ower e xtremity s ymptoms and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re - characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination .


The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20 130910 , w/atchs
Exhib it B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record






XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
 DoD Physical Disability Board of Review



SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , AR20150007598 (PD201301399)


I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application. This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02308

    Original file (PD-2013-02308.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He rated his pain at 4/10. Deluca criteria§4.71a Rating10%* (PEB 10%)10% (VA 10%) invalid font number 31502 *IAW VASRD §4.59, Painful motion invalid font number 31502 The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence.The PEB coded the chronic LBP secondary to L5-S1 HNP without neurologic deficit condition 5243 (Intervertebral Disc Syndrome) and rated at 10%. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00032

    Original file (PD2012-00032.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Lower Back Condition . The Board considered whether the PEB removal of an unfitting sciatica was deliberate and if additional permanent rating could be recommended under a peripheral nerve code, as conferred by the FPEB for TDRL entry, for the sciatic radiculopathy at separation. The Board concluded therefore that the left sciatic radiculopathy condition could not be recommended for additional disability rating.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00109

    Original file (PD2010-00109.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB forwarded lumbar DDD and HNP without myelopathy to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB). In the VA compensation & pension (C&P) exam on 7 December 2006, eight months after separation, the examiner documented that the CI had constant, localized pain at 10 being the worst, elicited by physical activity and relieved by medication, muscle relaxers and steroid injections. Left Leg Radiculopathy Condition .

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00213

    Original file (PD-2014-00213.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic LBP523710%Lumbosacral Intervertebral Disc Syndrome524310%20070227S1 Radiculopathy Left Lower Extremity5243-852010%20070227Other x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x 0 RATING: 10%RATING: 20% *Derived from VA Rating...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 00218

    Original file (PD 2013 00218.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The CI was referred to physical therapy (PT) for S1 radiculopathy with physical exam findings of antalgic gait, L5-S1 pain, and positive straight leg raise on the right. By precedent, the Board threshold for a “moderate” peripheral nerve rating requires some functionally significant motor and/or sensory impairment.After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01174

    Original file (PD-2013-01174.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. “The neurologic exam was grossly non-focal.” Three months prior to separation, he was seen for severe pain and noted to have tenderness, muscle spasm, pain with full ROM, and normal contour of the lumbosacral spine. I...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00886

    Original file (PD-2014-00886.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) neurological examination noted that initially the CI had normal lumbar x-rays and was treated with physical therapy. At the VA C&P examinations reviewed, both on the same daya year after separation, the CI’s exam noted muscle spasm and TL ROM of flexion of 40 degrees with pain to 80 degrees and a combined ROM of 225 degreesand normal sensation at the neuro exam, whereas the general exam noted only “pain with motion” with decreased LLE sensation. At the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00383

    Original file (PD2010-00383.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board notes that the CI contends that the left lower radiculopathy, abnormal MRI and EMC/NCV were overlooked by the PEB. An exam at a pain clinic, three weeks later, showed normal sensory and motor exams with normal deep tendon reflexes. I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01413

    Original file (PD-2013-01413.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    During an examination at a VA medical center in 1 March 2001 approximately 3 years prior to separation, the CI noted “constant discomfort at the lower back at 3/10 intensity,” increasing to 6/10 with exacerbations and radiating into the left thigh and knee. In the matter of the low back pain with herniated disc condition, and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB rating, but recommends a change to VASRD code 5243, IAW the VASRD rating standards for the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01435

    Original file (PD2012 01435.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    No physical examination findings were documented. Although the DA 199 mentioned characteristic pain on motion, which supports a 10% disability rating using either the 2003 or the current VASRD, the PEB assigned a 0% rating.The VA determined that neither the back pain nor the left leg radiculopathy was service-connected or service aggravated. Physical Disability Board of Review