Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01413
Original file (PD-2013-01413.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX     CASE: PD-2013-01413
BRANCH OF SERVICE: AIR FORCE     BOARD DATE: 20141030
SEPARATION DATE: 20030928


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an Air National Guard SSgt /E-5 (3P/Security Forces) medically separated for back condition. This condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty or to satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The chronic uncomplicated non-radicular low back pain (LBP) condition was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AFI 48-123. No other condition was submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB result was not available in evidence for the Board’s review, but the CI appealed to the Formal PEB, VA Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no further appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: The CI attached a single page statement to his application, with 30 pages of service treatment records already in evidence, all of which were reviewed by the Board and considered in its recommendations.

His complete submission, with attachments is at Exhibit A


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified, but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting back condition is addressed below. The contended neck, irritable bowel/reflux and tinnitus conditions were not identified by the MEB or PEB; and thus are not within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. These, and any other condition or contention not requested in this application, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.

The Board acknowledges the CI’s contention that suggests a higher rating should have been granted on the unfitting medical condition documented at the time of separation. IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. The Board’s role is thus confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, compared to VASRD standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation; and, to review those fitness determinations within its scope (as elaborated above) consistent with performance-based criteria in evidence at separation.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service FPEB – Dated 20030930
 VA* - Based on Service Treatment Records (STR)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Back Pain 5295 10% Herniated Nucleus Pulposus 5243 10% STR
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 2
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 10%
*Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20040513 (most proximate to date of separation (DOS))
ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Chronic Back Pain. Review of the service treatment records (STR) reveals the CI with a history of LBP. Pain started in December 2000 after he fell from some bleachers during a training exercise. He was seen later for LBP without radiculopathy. Upon examination, muscle spasm was noted on the right lumbar area, with forward flexion limited to 110 degrees. Later that month, he was re-evaluated and a normal neurological examination was noted, except for a positive straight leg raise (SLR) test on the left.

During an examination at a VA medical center in 1 March 2001 approximately 3 years prior to separation, the CI noted “constant discomfort at the lower back at 3/10 intensity,” increasing to 6/10 with exacerbations and radiating into the left thigh and knee. The CI noted “difficulty walking due to instability” and difficulty with stairs. The examination revealed a non-tender spine and painful limited motion of the lumbar spine. Radiologic imaging on 8 March 2001 noted a left L5-S1 disc herniation (HNP) with compression of the thecal sac (the membrane surrounding the nerve root) at the left S1 nerve root.” Neurosurgery evaluation on 11 May 2002 (16 months prior to separation) recommended surgery, which the CI declined, stating later that he had thought he “could go on without surgery.”

The commander’s memorandum to the MEB (12 months prior to separation) stated that the CI was “physically incapable of reasonably performing duties…due to his back problems.” The CI received a permanent (L3) profile (7 months prior to separation), noting a diagnosis of “herniated lumbar disc L5-S1, chronic low back pain,” limited exercise to “walking at own pace and distance” and limited lifting to 10 pounds.

At the MEB Medical Examination (DD Form 2808 and 2807), dated 7 months prior to separation, the CI reported LBP. The examination documented a negative SLR test, normal deep tendon reflexes (DTR) and a diagnosis of “Chronic low back pain- HNP L5-S1.” The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM), approximately 8 months prior to separation, reported stiffness and soreness, especially after prolonged sitting or standing, treated with Motrin (pain reliever) and Flexeril (muscle relaxer). There were no documented incapacitating episodes. The examination documented a normal lordotic (lumbar) curve, normal gait and absence of muscle spasm. After the MEB, the CI was seen several more times for LBP, with intensity up to 9/10, but otherwise unchanged. The first VA Compensation and Pension exam was conducted approximately five years after separation and had no probative value.

The goniometric range-of-motion (ROM) evaluations in evidence which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, are summarized in the chart below.
Thoracolumbar ROM
(Degrees)		 VA Exam
~3 Yrs. Pre-Sep (20010301)
 NARSUM
 ~8 Mo. Pre-Sep
(20030205)
Flexion (90 Normal) “limited” 70
Extension (30) 20 30
R Lat Flexion (30) 30 20
L Lat Flexion (30) 30 20
R Rotation (30) 20 Not recorded
L Rotation (30) 20 Not recorded
Combined (240) Not available Not available
Comment 4/5 left leg weakness, +SLR, normal gait, sensation and reflexes. Normal gait, normal lordotic (lumbar) curve, no muscle spasm
§4.71a Rating 10% 10%

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB awarded a 10% rating utilizing VASRD code 5295 (intervertebral disc syndrome) IAW the interim spine rating rules, which were superseded by the new spine rules on 26 September 2003. The VA awarded a 10% rating utilizing VASRD code 5243 (intervertebral disc syndrome), IAW the new spine rating rules; based on the CI’s STR.

The Board noted that the current VASRD §4.71a rating standards for the spine went into effect prior to the DOS and IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board is required to recommend a rating IAW the VASRD in effect at the time of separation. The Board deliberate and determined that the forward flexion of 70 degrees, as noted in the NARSUM exam in the chart above qualifies for a 10% rating under code 5243 via VASRD §4.71a with application of the General Rating Formula for Diseases and Injuries of the Spine. There was no documentation of ankylosis of the spine, or incapacitating episodes (physician prescribed bed rest) approximating 4 weeks, or other evidence that would support a higher rating.

After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt) and §4.59 (painful motion), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the chronic back pain. The Board also notes that, under the new spine rules in effect at the time of separation, VASRD code 5295 was no longer applicable and therefore recommends changing the VASRD code to 5243 at 10%, with application of the current General Rating Formula for Diseases and Injuries of the Spine, for the chronic low back pain condition.

Peripheral Neuropathy: The Board considered whether an additional rating could be recommended under a peripheral nerve code for a left S1 radiculopathy. Firm Board precedence requires a functional impairment linked to fitness to support a recommendation for addition of a peripheral nerve rating to disability in spine cases. The pain component of the neuropathy was appropriately subsumed in the spine rating, IAW VASRD §4.71a, and no sensory component was identified. However, the Board members deliberated whether the left leg weakness, noted in evidence early in the course of this condition, had impacted fitness to an extent that would justify a separate rating.

In a follow-up examination after his injury, the CI was noted to have constant pain radiating into his left leg with decreased strength (4/5) in the left leg. Radiographic imaging noted a left L5-S1 disc herniation with compression of the thecal sac [the membrane surrounding the nerve root] at the left S1 nerve root.” An electromyogram, used to measure the functional condition of the nerves of the lower extremities, was performed 8 months prior to separation was “suggestive of left L5 nerve root irritation.” A permanent L3 profile issued on 7 February 2003, listed the diagnosis of “herniated lumbar disc L5-S1, chronic low back pain,” outlined numerous restrictions as noted above. The commander’s memorandum to the MEB noted only the CI’s impairment due to back pain. A physical therapy note (8 months prior to separation) noted normal gait, “no loss” of sensation and full strength (“5/5”) in the lower extremities with “no evidence of radiculopathy.” The MEB NARSUM noted that the CI denied “any lower extremity radiculopathy.” The NARSUM examination noted normal sensation, strength and reflexes, in the lower extremities, with a normal gait and normal “heel and toe walk” (a test for neuropathy).

After due deliberation, the Board agreed that the preponderance of the evidence with regard to the functional impairment of the left leg weakness demonstrated that the condition was neither sufficiently profiled nor implicated in the commander’s statement and was not judged separately to fail retention standards. This condition was reviewed by the action officer and considered by the Board. There was no performance-based evidence from the record that this condition independently or significantly interfered with satisfactory duty performance. The Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a left leg radiculopathy as an additionally unfitting condition for disability rating, and no additional disability rating is recommended.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the low back pain with herniated disc condition, and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB rating, but recommends a change to VASRD code 5243, IAW the VASRD rating standards for the spine that were in effect at the time of separation. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Chronic Low Back Pain Condition 5243 10%
COMBINED 10%



The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20130917, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record






                                   
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review

SAF/MRB
Dear XXXXXXXXXXXXXX:
         Reference your application submitted under the provisions of DoDI 6040.44 (Title 10 U.S.C. § 1554a), PDBR Case Number PD-2013-01413.

         After careful consideration of your application and treatment records, the Physical Disability Board of Review determined that the rating assigned at the time of final disposition of your disability evaluation system processing was not appropriate under the guidelines of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities. Accordingly, the Board recommended modification of your assigned disability rating without re-characterization of your separation with severance pay.

         I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board. I concur with that finding, accept their recommendation and direct that your records be corrected as set forth in the attached copy of a Memorandum for the Chief of Staff, United States Air Force. The office responsible for making the correction will inform you when your records have been changed.

                                                               Sincerely,




 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
Attachments:
1. Directive
2. Record of Proceedings

cc:
SAF/MRBR

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01462

    Original file (PD-2014-01462.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. RATING COMPARISON : Service IPEB – Dated 20060331VA -(> 6 Years Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Back Pain status post (S/P) L5-S1 Discectomy w/o Neurologic or Electrodiagnostic Abnormality...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00470

    Original file (PD 2014 00470.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic low back pain due to back injury with findings of a disc protrusion at L5/S1” as unfitting, rated at 10%with likely application of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. RATING COMPARISON : Service IPEB – Dated 20060421VA -(3 Days Pre-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic LBP w/ disc protrusion at L5/S1523710%L5/S1...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 00200

    Original file (PD 2013 00200.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The examination noted bilateral lumbar muscle tenderness and limited range-of-motion (ROM) and reported a diagnosis of “acute lumbosacral strain/sprain with (+) [right] SLR test.” The permanent (L3) profile listed the diagnosis as back pain, but also with herniated disc (HNP) with radiculopathy, and severely restricted the CI from activities. The VA C&P examination, a month after separation, noted a positive straight leg raise test in the right leg (indicative of radiculopathy),(4/5)...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02528

    Original file (PD-2013-02528.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The back condition, characterized as “persistent L5 radiculopathy”, was the forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E.The Informal PEB adjudicated “persistent L5 radiculopathy failing surgical decompression”as unfitting, rated at0%,with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00814

    Original file (PD 2014 00814.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Anterior Lumbar Fusion524120%Low Back Strain with Sciatica5243-523720%20100128Left Leg Numbness Associated with Low Back Strain with Sciatica852010%20100128L5-S1 Herniated DiskCategory IISee Above20100128MicrodiskectomyCategory IISee Above20100128Other x1 (Not in Scope)Other x520100111 Combined: 20%Combined: 70%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20100420 (most proximate to date of separation) ANALYSIS SUMMARY :The PEB...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01739

    Original file (PD-2013-01739.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board considered the CI’s history of significant back pain with muscle spasm and radiation of pain with mild weakness and decreased sensation of the right lower leg. However, notes in the STRs proximate to separation indicated daily use of a muscle relaxant medication and later evidence in record suggests episodes of muscle spasm continued, consistent with the lumbar spine abnormalities noted on MRI.Board members consensus was that the totality of evidence in record supports the 20%...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01112

    Original file (PD-2013-01112.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The back condition, characterized as “herniated thoracic disc” and “herniated lumbar disc” by the MEB, was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam LBP diagnosed as Herniated Thoracic and Lumbar Disc523710%Lumbar Spine Degenerative Arthritis524210%20081212Other x 7 (Not in Scope)Other x 620081212 Rating: 10%Combined: 60%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20090511(most proximate to date of separation)...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01435

    Original file (PD2012 01435.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    No physical examination findings were documented. Although the DA 199 mentioned characteristic pain on motion, which supports a 10% disability rating using either the 2003 or the current VASRD, the PEB assigned a 0% rating.The VA determined that neither the back pain nor the left leg radiculopathy was service-connected or service aggravated. Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00268

    Original file (PD-2014-00268.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam LBP524310%Lumbar Spine Disc Herniation’s524320%20070105Other x 2 (Not In Scope)Other x 3 Combined: 10%Combined: 50%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20070104 ( most proximate to date of separation [DOS]). The Board directs attention to its rating recommendationbased on the above evidence.The PEB rated the LBP condition 10% and the VA rated it 20%, both coded 5243(intervertebral disc syndrome). RECOMMENDATION : The Board,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00213

    Original file (PD-2014-00213.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic LBP523710%Lumbosacral Intervertebral Disc Syndrome524310%20070227S1 Radiculopathy Left Lower Extremity5243-852010%20070227Other x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x 0 RATING: 10%RATING: 20% *Derived from VA Rating...