Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01378
Original file (PD-2013-01378.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX     CASE: PD-2013-01378
BRANCH OF SERVICE: AIR FORCE     BOARD DATE: 20140326
SEPARATION DATE: 20040322


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was a Reserve TSgt/E-6 (8B000/Training Instructor) medically separated for a degenerative disc disease (DDD) condition. She had a history of lumbar pain since 1990, which was exacerbated in 2000. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of her Air Force Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. She was issued limited restriction P2/L2 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The back condition, characterized as “lumbar spondylosis” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AFI 48-123. The MEB also forwarded fibromyalgia (FM) and seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis conditions as medically acceptable. The Informal PEB adjudicated “degenerative disk disease associated with herniated nucleus pulposus L5-S1 with left radicular pain” as unfitting, rated 20%, citing the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The PEB adjudicated FM and seasonal allergic rhinitis as Category II conditions (can be unfit, but not compensable/ratable). The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “Diagnostic code 5242 for disc disease was/is accompanied by scoliosis of 20% & required a pro-disc spinal implant in 2011 due to fusion & leg pain & numbness. Fibromyalgia later added after 2004 discharge approved a developed from Golf War-but did not include an increase in VA Compensation though 20% compensable percentage was assigned, the % assigned by the V.A. was only 10% then combined w/`10% for fibromyalgia which had previously been denied for compensation. Then compensation was considered at 20% as a combined rating. Orthopedic MRI’s & x-rays will show scoliosis at 20 degrees even after pro-disc surgery to correct L5-S1 bone on bone, nerve impingement, numbness, gluteus muscle atrophy, nerve damage. Nerve damage & muscle atrophy, leg pain remains & some range of motion limitations remain, in addition muscle spasms.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting back condition is addressed below. The fibromyalgia and seasonal allergic rhinitis conditions are also addressed below. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review may be eligible for consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20040205
 VA - (Pre-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
DDD Associated with Herniated Nucleus Pulposus L5-S 1 with left Radicular Pain 5242 20% DDD, Lumbosacral Spine 5243 10% 20040316
Fibromyalgia 5025 Cat II Fibromyalgia 5025 10% 20040315
Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis 6522 Cat II Chronic Sinusitis 6512 NSC
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
 Other x 15 20040316
Combined: 20%
 Combined: 20%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 20040420 ( most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] )


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Low Back Pain (LBP). The CI has a history of chronic LBP and left lower extremity (LLE) sciatic pain. In 2001, magnetic resonance imaging showed marked L5-S1 DDD with small left paracentral herniated nucleus pulposus. She was treated with multiple non-operative modalities including chiropractic manipulation. The LBP was refractory to treatment and an MEB was initiated. Her MEB physical exam (PE) was in November 2003. Range-of-motion (ROM) tests revealed flexion 90 degrees, extension 15 degrees, rotation 45 degrees (bilateral) and lateral bending 45 degrees (bilateral). This gives a combined thoracolumbar ROM of 225 degrees. Neurological exam revealed a decreased left ankle jerk and decreased sensation in the S1 dermatome. On 16 March 2004, 6 days prior to separation from service, the CI had a VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam. She complained of constant midline LBP and constant numbness in the LLE. Her gait was normal, and she walked into the clinic without assistance. PE of the back showed the spine to be essentially midline, with some straightening of the normal lumbar lordosis. There was significant paravertebral muscle spasm, which increased with active ROM. Heel-toe walking was intact and straight leg raise was negative. Lower extremity active ROM was essentially intact throughout. Neurological exam revealed an absent ankle jerk on the left and decreased sensation in the S1 dermatome. Motor strength for the LLE was normal throughout.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation. The PEB and the VA chose different coding and rating options for the LBP condition. At the November 2003 MEB exam, the CI’s combined thoracolumbar ROM was 225 degrees. IAW the VASRD §4.71a, a 10% rating is warranted when combined thoracolumbar ROM is greater than 120 degrees, but not greater than 235 degrees. At the March 2004 C&P exam, there was significant paravertebral muscle spasm with some straightening of lumbar lordosis. IAW VASRD §4.71a, a 20% rating is warranted when there is muscle spasm severe enough to result in abnormal spinal contour. After a thorough review of the evidence, the Board determined that a disability rating of 20% was appropriate. The Board tried to find a path to a higher rating, using other codes which could be applied to the LBP condition. The other VASRD codes that were considered did not result in a higher rating, since the treatment record did not show sufficient evidence of a disabling spine condition which would justify a rating higher than 20%.

The Board also considered the matter of peripheral neuropathy. After reviewing all the information in the record, there was insufficient evidence of a clinically significant neuropathy that interfered with satisfactory performance of military duties. The CI clearly had radicular symptoms, evidence of muscle atrophy and an abnormal neurological exam. However, there was no performance-based evidence that the nerve condition impacted her military duties in any way. The Board concluded that there was no unfitting radiculopathy present at the time of separation. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board found insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the LBP condition.
Other Conditions. FM and seasonal allergic rhinitis were both adjudicated by the PEB as Category II (conditions that can be unfitting, but are not compensable or ratable). The Board’s main charge is to assess the fairness of the PEB’s determination that these two conditions were not unfitting. The Board’s threshold for countering fitness determinations is higher than the VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt) standard used for its rating recommendations, but remains adherent to the DoDI 6040.44 “fair and equitable” standard. The FM and seasonal allergic rhinitis were not specifically profiled, implicated in the commander’s statement or judged to fail retention standards. They were reviewed by the action officer and considered by the Board. There was no performance-based evidence from the record that either of these conditions significantly interfered with satisfactory duty performance. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB fitness determination for these two conditions. Therefore, no additional disability ratings are recommended.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the LBP condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. In the matter of the FM and seasonal allergic rhinitis, the Board unanimously recommends no change from the PEB determination as not unfitting. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20130917, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record








                                   
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review

SAF/MRB
Dear XXXXXXXXXXXXXX:

         Reference your application submitted under the provisions of DoDI 6040.44 (Title 10 U.S.C. § 1554a), PDBR Case Number PD-2013-01378.

         After careful consideration of your application and treatment records, the Physical Disability Board of Review determined that the rating assigned at the time of final disposition of your disability evaluation system processing was appropriate. Accordingly, the Board recommended no re-characterization or modification of your separation.

         I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board. I concur with that finding and their conclusion that re-characterization of your separation is not warranted. Accordingly, I accept their recommendation that your application be denied.

                                                               Sincerely,
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
Attachment:
Record of Proceedings

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02664

    Original file (PD-2013-02664.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic LBP with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at L5-S1” as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). My rating was for Chronic Low back pain with Degenerative disc Disease at L5-S1, what was not included but could be condition for being unfit. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00673

    Original file (PD2011-00673.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated the lumbar DDD condition as unfitting, rated 10% with application of the Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The Board therefore has no reasonable basis for recommending any additional unfitting conditions for separation rating. I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00533

    Original file (PD2012-00533.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 20% for the chronic LBP condition coded 5292-5293 which includes limited motion, pain and sensory loss in the right lower extremity. Both MEB exams indicated pain with motion and the right hip X-ray demonstrated degenerative arthritis. 5 PD1200533 RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows; and,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00078

    Original file (PD2012-00078.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A PT examination on 28 January 2008 noted a mildly antalgic gait, normal ROM and reduced girth of the left thigh as well as reduced strength in the left lower extremity (LLE). Left Knee Condition. Left Knee ROM Flexion (140 Normal) Extension (0 Normal) Comment §4.71a Rating Ortho ~17 Mo.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01603

    Original file (PD2012 01603.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEWNAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE: PD1201603BRANCH OF SERVICE: AIR FORCEBOARD DATE: 20131016 Contended PEB Conditions .The Board’s main charge is to assess the fairness of the PEB’s determination that contended back pain,cold induced urticaria and hypertension conditions were not unfitting. In the matter of the contended back pain, cold induced uticariaand hypertension conditions the Board unanimously recommends no change from the PEB...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01082

    Original file (PD 2012 01082.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s role is confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, based on severity at the time of separation. In the matter of the chronic LBP condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20%, coded 5243, IAW VASRD §4.71a that was in effect at the time of separation. Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00275

    Original file (PD2011-00275.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    (2) is limited to those conditions which were determined by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB.” The ratings for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases. Chronic Low Back Pain with Fusion L4 to S1 Condition . RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02651

    Original file (PD-2013-02651.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic thoracolumbar back pain due to scoliosis” as unfitting, rated 20%, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. RECOMMENDATION : The Board,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01492

    Original file (PD-2013-01492.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the 10% rating criteria – “localized tenderness not resulting in abnormal gait or abnormal spinal contour.” All exams proximate to separation documented paraspinal tenderness at the mid to lower lumbar regions and the only exam with ROM measurements documented normal thoracolumbar ROM.The “General Rating Formula for Diseases and Injuries of the Spine considers the CI’s pain symptoms “with or without symptoms such as pain (whether or not it radiates), stiffness or aching...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 01018

    Original file (PD 2014 01018.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    LBP due to DDD S/P Microdiscectomy and Fusion L5-S1 Condition .The CI underwent the following surgeries:1. Two days later the primary care provider noted significant lumbar muscle spasm, tightness, left straight leg raising significantly restricted and decreased reflex of the left lower extremity. I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board.