Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00719
Original file (PD2012-00719.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW 

SEPARATION DATE:  20021225 

 
NAME:  XXXXXXXXXXXXXX                                                                      BRANCH OF SERVICE:   ARMY 
CASE NUMBER:  PD1200719 
BOARD DATE:  20130116 
 
 
SUMMARY  OF  CASE:    Data  extracted  from  the  available  evidence  of  record  reflects  that  this 
covered  individual  (CI)  was  an  active  duty  SPC/E‐4  (11C/Indirect  Fire  Infantryman)  medically 
separated for chronic low back pain (LBP) due to lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD).  He 
was  treated,  but  did  not  adequately  improve  to  fully  perform  his  military  duties  or  meet 
physical  fitness  standards.    He  was  issued  a  permanent  profile  and  underwent  a  Medical 
Evaluation Board (MEB).  The MEB found the lumbar DDD medically unacceptable, and referred 
him  to  a  Physical  Evaluation  Board  (PEB).    No  other  conditions  were  listed  on  the  DD  Form 
3947.    The  PEB  found  the  LBP  condition  unfitting,  and  rated  it  10%  IAW  DoD  Instruction 
1332.39.  The CI accepted the PEB findings, and was medically separated with 10% disability. 
 
 
CI’s CONTENTION:  “My disability increased.  It is very hard to complete simple daily activities. 
Single parent.” 
 
 
SCOPE OF REVIEW:  The Board’s scope of review as defined in DoDI 6040.44, is limited to those 
conditions which were determined by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military 
service; or, when requested by the CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be 
unfitting by the PEB.”  The unfitting back condition (chronic low back pain status post intradiscal 
electrothermal  therapy)  meets  the  criteria  prescribed  in  DoDI  6040.44,  and  is  accordingly 
addressed below.  No other conditions are within the Board’s purview.  Any condition outside 
the Board’s defined scope of review may be eligible for future consideration by the Army Board 
for Correction of Military Records. 
 
 
RATING COMPARISON:   
 

Army  PEB – dated 20021017 

Condition 

Code 

Chronic Low Back Pain 

5299‐5295 

Rating
10% 

Combined:  10% 

VA (4 mos. Post‐Separation) – Effective 20021226 
Condition 

Code 

Degenerative Disc Disease 

5010‐5293 

Combined:  0%* 

Rating 
0%* 

Exam 

(no exam) 

     *The VA rating for Lumbar DDD was later increased to 20%, by a subsequent VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20030910 
 
 
ANALYSIS SUMMARY:  The Board acknowledges the sentiment expressed by the CI regarding 
the  impairment  with  which  his  back  condition  continues  to  burden  him,  and  the  significant 
impact that it has had on his quality of life.  It is noted for the record that the Board is subject to 
the same laws for disability entitlements as those under which the military Disability Evaluation 
System (DES) operates.  The DES has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members 
for future severity or potential complications of conditions.  That role and authority is granted 
to  the  Department  of  Veterans  Administration  (DVA).    The  Board  evaluates  DVA  evidence  in 
arriving  at  its  recommendations,  but  its  authority  resides  in  evaluating  the  fairness  of  DES 
fitness and rating determinations at the time of separation.  Compensation can only be granted 
for the degree of severity present at the time of separation.  The DVA, however, is empowered 

to  periodically  re‐evaluate  a  CI’s  conditions  for  the  purpose  of  adjusting  the  disability  rating 
should the degree of impairment change over time. 
 
Chronic Low Back Pain (LBP).  In May 2001, the CI suffered onset of LBP during physical training.  
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed mild L5‐S1 central disc protrusion, and mild central 
canal  stenosis.    In  January  2002,  he  had  intradiscal  electrothermal  therapy  (IDET)  at  Brooke 
Army Medical Center, San Antonio TX.  After that procedure, he continued to have problems 
with LBP and an MEB was initiated.  His MEB physical examination was on 1 August 2002.  At 
that exam, there was slight tenderness to palpation (TTP) in the paravertebral lumbar region.  
Deep tendon reflexes (DTRs) and straight leg raise (SLR) tests were normal.  Neurological exam 
of the lower extremities revealed no motor or sensory deficits.  Range‐of‐motion (ROM) had 
been measured by physical therapy (PT) a few days earlier, and it is summarized in the chart 
below. 
 
On 14 July 2003, the CI had a VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam.  Posture, gait, and 
spinal curvature were all normal.  Sacroiliac joints were mildly tender, but nothing significant.  
No paraspinal tenderness or spasms were noted.  Neurological exam (sensory and motor) was 
essentially  within  normal  limits.    ROM  was  measured  by  kinesiotherapy  and  is  summarized 
below: 
 

Thoracolumbar ROM 

Flexion  
Combined  

MEB/PT ~5 mo. Pre‐Sep 

VA ~7 Mo. Post‐Sep 

(July 2002) 

45⁰ 
155⁰ 

(July 2003) 

68⁰ 
164⁰ 

 

 

 

          
The Board carefully reviewed all evidentiary information available, and directs attention to its 
rating recommendation based on the above evidence.  The VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities 
(VASRD)  coding  and  rating  standards  for  the  spine,  which  were  in  effect  at  the  time  of 
separation, were changed to the current §4.71a rating standards in September 2003.  The older 
standards for rating were subject to the rater’s opinion regarding degree of severity, whereas 
current standards specify rating thresholds in actual degrees of ROM impairment.  The Board 
must comply with the DoDI 6040.44 requirement for rating IAW the VASRD in effect at the time 
of  separation  from  service.    The  Board  noted  that  the  Army  PEB  and  the  VA  chose  different 
coding  options  for  the  LBP  condition.    The  VA  used  diagnostic  code  5010‐5293  (arthritis‐
intervertebral disc syndrome).  The PEB used code 5299‐5295 (low back condition analogous to 
lumbosacral strain).  The Board determined that the most appropriate coding option was 5292, 
and the CI’s LBP condition was best described as “moderate.”  There was insufficient evidence 
in  the  treatment  record  to  support  classifying  his  LBP  condition  as  “severe.”    After  due 
deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the 
Board recommends by majority decision (2:1 vote) a disability rating of 20% for the chronic LBP 
condition.  It is appropriately coded 5292, and meets VASRD §4.71a criteria for the 20% rating. 
 
 
BOARD FINDINGS:  IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or 
guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were 
inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.  As discussed above, PEB 
reliance  on  DoDI  1332.39  was  operant  in  this  case  and  the  condition  was  adjudicated 
independently of that instruction by the Board.  In the matter of the chronic LBP condition, the 
Board recommends by majority decision (2:1 vote) a rating of 20%, coded 5292, IAW §4.71a of 
the VASRD in effect at the time of separation.  The single voter for dissent (who recommended 
a 10% rating) did not elect to submit a minority opinion.  There were no other conditions within 
the Board’s scope of review for consideration. 
 

   2                                                           PD1200719 
 

RECOMMENDATION:  The Board, therefore, recommends that the CI’s prior determination be 
modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:  
 

Chronic Low Back Pain, status post IDET

UNFITTING CONDITION

 
 
The following documentary evidence was considered: 
 
Exhibit A.  DD Form 294, dated 20120604, w/atchs 
Exhibit B.  Service Treatment Record 
Exhibit C.  Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

           XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, DAF 
           Director 
           Physical Disability Board of Review 

VASRD CODE  RATING

5292 

COMBINED 

20%
20%

 

SFMR‐RB 
 

 

 
 

 

 

 
 

 

MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency  

(TAPD‐ZB / XXXXXXXXXX), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA  22202‐3557 

SUBJECT:  Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation  

for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20130001628 (PD201200719) 

1.  I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review 
(DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual.  

Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a,   I accept the Board’s 

recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 20% without recharacterization 

of the individual’s separation.  This decision is final.   

2.  I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected 

accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.    

3.  I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the 
individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and 

to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures. 

 BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY: 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 

   3                                                           PD1200719 
 

Encl 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     XXXXXXXXXXX 

     Deputy Assistant Secretary 
         (Army Review Boards) 

 

 

 

 
CF:  

(  ) DoD PDBR 

(  ) DVA 

 
 
 
 

   4                                                           PD1200719 
 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00510

    Original file (PD-2012-00510.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated chronic low back pain s/p intradiscal electrothermal therapy and pelvic adhesive disease without documented partial obstruction, as unfitting, rated 10% and 10%, with application of the Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 1332.39 and AR 635‐40. The Board notes the VA ratings for other conditions documented at the time of separation and for conditions not diagnosed while in the service (but later determined to be service‐connected by the VA). The CI’s condition...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01798

    Original file (PD2012 01798.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pain was elicited on straight leg raise (SLR) without pain radiation, and no other objective evidence of radiculopathy.During the MEB/NARSUM on 4 August 2002,the evaluation noted normal neuromuscular examination, normal gait (heel toe walk and tandem walk), and no evidence ofradiculopathy.Upon MEB/NARSUM evaluation on 7 November 2002, approximately 4 months prior to separation, the CI reported chronic back pain. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00712

    Original file (PD2011-00712.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Service ratings for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases. Low Back Pain Condition . The VA rating decision mentioned their 20% rating was “non-schedular”, however, “guarding severe enough to result in an abnormal gait” is a 20% rating criteria.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00762

    Original file (PD2011-00762.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Other PEB Conditions. Other Conditions. Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record President Physical Disability Board of Review SFMR-RB MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation 1.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00521

    Original file (PD2011-00521.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    At his March 2008 MEB evaluation, four months prior to separation, the CI complained of low back pain, worse with prolonged sitting. The PEB and the VA had used different codes for the low back pain condition, but both had assigned a disability rating of 20%. In the matter of the low back pain condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00708

    Original file (PD2012-00708.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB rated the condition 10% based on pain on forward motion under the 5295 code for lumbosacral strain. The VA reported 90 degrees of lumbar forward flexion and ROMs were consistent with near-normal ROMs from the AMA guidelines in effect at the time, and the Board adjudged these as slight limitation (IAW 5292, Spine, limitation of lumbar motion). Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, DAF Director Physical Disability...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00808

    Original file (PD2012 00808.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The MEB forwarded chronic back pain and chronic neck pain as medically unacceptablefor Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication IAW AR 40-501.The PEB adjudicated the “chronic pain, neck and LBP, without neurologic abnormality” as unfitting, rated together as 10% with application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. In the matter of the “unbundled” chronic neck pain condition, the Board unanimously agrees it was not separately unfitting and that it cannot...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-01058

    Original file (PD2012-01058.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    IAW DoDI 6040.44, this Board must consider the appropriate rating for the CI’s back condition at separation based on the VASRD standards in effect at that time. An outpatient examination on 21 November 2001 (7 months prior to separation) documented a negative straight leg raise (SLR) test and normal muscle strength, sensation and DTRs. At a later C&P exam on 23 June 2003 (a year after separation), the CI reported constant low back dull, aching pain.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01014

    Original file (PD 2012 01014.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the low back condition as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). CI CONTENTION: “I have to take medication for my back to relieve the pain. Post-Sep (20030724) Flexion (90 Normal) 75 80 Extension (30) 15 10 R Lat Flex (30) 25 30 L Lat Flex (30) 20 30 R Rotation (30) 25 - L Rotation (30) 25 - Comment Tender to pressure; without palpable spasm; no visible deformity Pain...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00938

    Original file (PD 2012 00938.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records. The PEB rated the CI’s back pain condition at 10%, coded 5295 (lumbosacral strain) citing pain with motion without spasm (but also noted moderate limitation of motion). RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as...