RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW
BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY
SEPARATION DATE: 20020702
NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
CASE NUMBER: PD1200536
BOARD DATE: 20121030
SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this
covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (91W/Medic) medically separated for a right
ankle condition. He developed ankle pain in 2000, which was ultimately diagnosed as
osteochondritis dessicans; and, failed two attempts at surgical remedy. He was unable to meet
the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness
standards; was issued a permanent L3 profile; and, was referred for a Medical Evaluation Board
(MEB). The condition was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) as medically
unacceptable IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The PEB
adjudicated the right ankle condition as unfitting, rated 10%, citing criteria of the Veteran’s
Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals, and was
medically separated with that disability rating.
CI CONTENTION: The application states: “My right ankle is in constant pain that never
completely subsides. I have been on numerous pain control medication combinations both
over-the-counter and prescription. I cannot run. My joint range of motion is severely limited I
have a VA prescribed brace that I must wear for joint stability. There are days where just
walking can be a chore.” The CI’s narrative continues with a description of the impairments he
suffers from tinnitus (contending for separate ratings for each ear), chronic sinusitis, and
“debilitating” headaches.
SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in
Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 6040.44 (Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.2) is limited to
those conditions which were determined by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued
military service; or, when requested by the CI, those condition(s) “identified but not
determined to be unfitting by the PEB.” The rating for the unfitting right ankle condition is
addressed below; and, no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of
the Board. The additionally requested conditions (tinnitus, chronic sinusitis, and headaches)
were not identified by the PEB, and thus are not within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of
the Board. Those, and any conditions or contention outside the Board’s defined scope of
review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Army Board for Correction of Military
Records.
The Board acknowledges the CI’s information regarding the significant impairment with which
his service-connected conditions continue to burden him; but, must emphasize that the
Disability Evaluation System (DES) has neither the role nor the authority to compensate
members for anticipated future severity or potential complications of conditions resulting in
medical separation. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of
Veterans’ Affairs (DVA), operating under a different set of laws. The Board considers DVA
evidence proximate to separation in arriving at its recommendations; and, DoDI 6040.44
defines a 12-month interval for special consideration to post-separation evidence. All post-
separation evidence is probative to the Board’s recommendations only to the extent that it
reasonably reflects the disability at the time of separation.
RATING COMPARISON:
Service PEB – Dated 20020502
Condition
Code
Chronic Right Ankle Pain...
5299-5003
Rating
10%
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
Combined: 10%
VA (1 Mo. Pre-Separation) – Effective Date 20020703
Condition
Right Ankle Osteochondritis...
Tinnitus
Code
5271
6260
0% X 1 / Not Service Connected x 4
Rating
10%
10%
Exam
20020617
20020617
20020617
Combined: 20%
imaging.
ANALYSIS SUMMARY:
Right Ankle Condition. The CI experienced an onset of right ankle pain and swelling with
running in May 2000. The symptoms worsened; initial radiographs were negative; and, the
condition was managed conservatively. Computed tomography in August 2000 revealed an
osteochondral defect of the talar dome, and orthopedics prescribed a period in a non-
weightbearing (NWB) cast; but, follow-up imaging revealed a persistent defect. In January 2001
arthroscopic surgical intervention and another course of NWB was undertaken; but, was met
with continued symptoms and persistent defect on
A second arthroscopic
intervention performed in July 2001 followed by a third trial of NWB, yielded similar results;
and, the MEB was initiated. The narrative summary (NARSUM) noted persistent pain and
inability “to lift and carry patients, kneel or squat, crawl, walk on uneven terrain, run, or wear a
rucksack.” The physical exam noted “visible swelling” and lateral tenderness. There was no
comment on gait, but outpatient notes do not reflect abnormal gait or use of assistive
ambulatory device. The range-of-motion (ROM) recorded in the NARSUM was dorsiflexion 10
degrees (normal 20 degrees and plantar flexion 30 degrees (normal 45 degrees). An orthopedic
addendum to the NARSUM noted a similar history and physical exam, recording dorsiflexion 10
degrees and plantar flexion 45 degrees. The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam was
not available for review, but was adequately summarized in the rating decision: “VA examiner
noted pain on motion limiting participation in athletics, but there was no significant limitation
of range of motion. You reported at the VA exam that there is continual pain and swelling in
the ankle.”
The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The
PEB’s 10% rating analogously to 5003 (degenerative arthritis) cited “loss of motion;” which
complies with the VASRD §4.71a language under 5003 directing a 10% rating for “each such
major joint or group of minor joints affected by limitation of motion.” The VA’s 10% rating was
under code 5271 (ankle limitation of motion) for ‘moderate’ limitation. There is no available
alternate ankle joint code which would yield a higher rating; in the absence of ankylosis (frozen
joint), malunion, or astragalectomy (surgical removal of the talus). The only route to a higher
rating would be 20% under 5271 for ‘marked’ limitation of motion. Members agreed that the
preponderance of the ROM evidence was more reasonably characterized as ‘moderate.’ After
due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt),
the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB
adjudication of the right ankle condition.
BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or
guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were
inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not
surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD
were exercised. In the matter of the right ankle condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board
unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions
within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.
RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of
the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:
Chronic Pain and Surgical Residuals, Right Ankle
UNFITTING CONDITION
VASRD CODE RATING
5299-5003
COMBINED
10%
10%
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120602, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record.
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review
SFMR-RB
MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(TAPD-ZB / ), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557
SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20120020919 (PD201200536)
I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD
PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under
the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s
recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress
who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:
Encl
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Deputy Assistant Secretary
(Army Review Boards)
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00497
He had an OATS graft from the left knee to the left ankle on 12November 2002. Left Knee Pain Condition . There was no VA C&P examination proximate to the date of separation in the record due to a no-show.
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00631
Although there was limitation of motion, the normal gait on multiple examinations was not consistent with a moderate limitation of motion for the minimum rating under this code. It noted that the VASRD states that the intent is that the painful joint is “entitled to at least the minimum compensable rating for the joint.” After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.59 (painful motion) and VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01438
The Board did not find evidence that supported more than a moderate deformity of the talus.The PEB listed sinus tarsi syndrome of the right ankle as a condition related to the primary unfitting right ankle condition but not separately ratable (Category II). Pes planus was noted on the MEB NARSUM examination however service treatment records reflect treatment for ankle pain but not for impairment due to pes planus.The condition was reviewed and considered by the Board. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00545
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW Code 5271 Exam STR BRANCH OF SERVICE: MARINE CORPS SEPARATION DATE: 20011231 NAME: XX CASE NUMBER: PD1200545 BOARD DATE: 20130201 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty L.Cpl./E-3 (9900/Recruit), medically separated for osteochondritis dissecans, left posteromedial talus, surgically treated twice. Both the PEB and VA rated the ankle at 10%,...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-01566
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW BRANCH OF SERVICE: MARINE CORPS SEPARATION DATE: 20030615 NAME: X CASE NUMBER: PD1201566 BOARD DATE: 20130305 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty LCPL/E-3 (0341/Mortar Man), medically separated for right ankle osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) status post (s/p) scope and debridement right ankle. Right Ankle Condition. RECOMMENDATION: The...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00722
The VA exam noted painful right ankle ROM, as listed above. The VA rated the left and right ankle conditions separately as follows; coded 5271 painful limitation of ROM at 10% each for an overall rating of 20%. In the matter of the chronic bilateral ankle pain, due to right talar OCD lesion and left ankle chondromalacia condition, the Board unanimously recommends that it be rated for two separate unfitting conditions as follows: left ankle chondromalacia condition coded 5014‐5271 and rated...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00810
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW NAME: BRANCH OF SERVICE: navy CASE NUMBER: PD1100810 SEPARATION DATE: 20061201 BOARD DATE: 20120511 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty CTT2/E-5 (1733, Electronic Warfare Systems Technician), medically separated for a right ankle condition (osteochondral defect, right talar dome). Right Ankle Condition. CI elected not to have surgery...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-01639
The Board evaluates DVA evidence in arriving at its recommendations, but its authority resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness and rating determinations at the time of separation. Right Ankle Condition. Other PEB Conditions.
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01674
He continued to have pain in his ankle joint, and on 11 April 2000 the CI underwent a right ankle talar surgical procedure(bone graft from knee) with some improvement; however, he was unable to run. Radiographs of the right ankle in May 2003, a year after separation demonstrated surgical hardware devices were in place, and no fractures or acute abnormality noted.At the MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) evaluation on 12December 2001, 3 months prior to separation, physical examination revealed a...
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00517
invalid font number 31502 IPEB – Dated 20060915VA* - (~4 days Pre-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Left Ankle Pain…5099-50030%S/P Left Ankle Arthroscopy Debridement…5271-501010%20061012Scar, S/P Left Ankle Arthroscopy Debridement…780410%20061012Other MEB/PEB Conditions x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x 8 RATING: 0%COMBINED RATING: 50% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20061108 (most proximate to date of separation (DOS)). Left Ankle Condition . The VA...