RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW
SEPARATION DATE: 20070815
NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY
CASE NUMBER: PD1200429
BOARD DATE: 20121127
SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this
covered
individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (88N/Transportation Management
Coordinator), medically separated for non-radicular chronic low back pain (LBP) with L4/5
herniated disc and L5 Grade I spondylolisthesis. The CI experienced the onset of lower back
pain in October of 2005. There was no history of trauma or other back injuries. The chronic
LBP could not be adequately rehabilitated with anti-inflammatory medications, steroid
injections and physical therapy. The CI did not improve adequately with treatment to meet the
physical requirements of her Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness
standards. She was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board
(MEB). Allergic rhinitis condition, identified in the rating chart below, was also identified and
forwarded by the MEB. The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the non-radicular
chronic LBP with L4/5 herniated disc and L5 Grade I spondylolisthesis conditions as unfitting,
rated 10% with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).
The remaining condition was determined to be not unfitting. The CI made no appeals, and was
medically separated with a 10% disability rating.
CI CONTENTION: “The severity of the pain and inability to function due to my back problems
were not taken into account”.
SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in DoDI
6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2) is limited to those conditions which were determined
by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the
CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB.” The ratings
for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases. The service rated condition non-radicular
chronic LBP with L4/5 herniated disc and L5 Grade I spondylolisthesis as requested for
consideration meets the criteria prescribed in DoDI 6040.44 for Board purview; and, is
addressed below. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise
outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the
Army Board for Correction of Military Records.
RATING COMPARISON:
Service PEB – Dated 20070523
VA (6 Mos. Post-Separation) – All Effective Date 20070816
Code
Rating
Condition
Code
Rating
Exam
5299-5237
10%
Spondylolisthesis of the Lumbar
Spine
5239
0%
20080213
Condition
Non-radicular Chronic Low
Back Pain with L4/5
Herniated Disc and L5
Grade I Spondylolisthesis
Allergic Rhinitis
↓No Additional MEB/PEB Entries↓
Not Unfitting
NO VA ENTRY
Tendonitis of the Left Achilles
Tendon
5024-5271
10%
20080213
Combined: 10%
Combined: 10%
ANALYSIS SUMMARY:
Non-radicular Chronic Low Back Pain with L4/5 Herniated Disc and L5 Grade I Spondylolisthesis.
There were three goniometric range-of-motion (ROM) evaluations
in evidence, with
documentation of additional ratable criteria, which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating
recommendation; as summarized in the chart below.
PT (Narsum)
~4 Mo. Pre-Sep*
VA C&P ~6 Mo. Post-Sep
VA C&P ~4 Years Post-Sep
Thoracolumbar ROM
Flexion (90⁰ Normal)
Ext (0-30)
R Lat Flex (0-30)
L Lat Flex 0-30)
R Rotation (0-30)
L Rotation (0-30)
Combined (240⁰)
90⁰
20⁰
30⁰
20⁰
30⁰
30⁰
220⁰
90⁰
25⁰
30⁰
30⁰
30⁰
30⁰
230⁰
90⁰
30⁰
30⁰
30⁰
30⁰
30⁰
240⁰
+ Tenderness; painful motion
10% (no RD on file)
Comment:
*Inclinometer used by
PT
+ Tenderness; mild
muscle spasm; normal
gait and contour
§4.71a Rating
10%
+ Tenderness; painful
motion; normal gait;
Lasegue’s and SLR neg;
Waddell testing neg
10% (VA 0%)
At the MEB exam 4 months prior to separation, the CI reported the onset of LBP in October
2005. Although the CI’s back pain was not attributed to either of these events, her history was
significant for a car accident in 2005 and a fall on her tailbone while in Iraq. The pain was rated
“3-4/10 on a day to day basis” with occasional 8/10 episodes. There were no radicular
complaints. The CI was treated with anti-inflammatory medication, physical therapy and
epidural steroid injections without sustained pain relief. The CI was also evaluated by
neurosurgery and was not a surgical candidate. The MEB physical exam noted tenderness at
the L4-L5 level with mild muscle spasm. The gait and spinal contour were normal. The
neurologic exam was normal. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) exam performed in
December 2006 showed L4-5 prominent central disk extrusion without spinal stenosis or neural
foraminal narrowing.
L-Spine X-ray revealed bilat spondylolysis of L5 and grade 1
spondylolisthesis of L5 on S1. Profile and limitations were no Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT),
no lifting greater than 15 lbs, no standing greater than 30 minutes, and no impact activities. At
the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam 6 months after separation, the CI reported
constant dull pain at the left iliac crest and left buttock. She did not report radiation of the
pain. The exam was significant for tenderness over the lower spinous process without spasm.
The gait and posture were normal. The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation
based on the above evidence. The pain component, contended by the CI, is subsumed under
the general spine rating as specified in §4.71a. The CI had near-normal ROM with tenderness to
palpation along the lower spinous process per VA examination. This would meet the criterion
of local tenderness at a 10% rating evaluation level. Although mild spasms were noted on the
MEB exam, the gait and spinal contour were normal. A higher evaluation of 20% is not
supported by the evidence of record under code 5237 per the PEB coding nor 5239 per the VA
coding. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3
(reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a
change in the PEB adjudication for the chronic LBP condition. The Board concluded therefore
that this condition could not be recommended for additional disability rating.
BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or
guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were
inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not
surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD
were exercised. In the matter of the LBP and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously
recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the
Board’s scope of review for consideration.
RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of
the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:
UNFITTING CONDITION
Non-radicular Chronic Low Back Pain with L4/5 Herniated Disc and
L5 Grade I Spondylolistheis
VASRD CODE RATING
5299-5237
COMBINED
10%
10%
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120514, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review
SFMR-RB
MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(TAPD-ZB / ), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557
SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20120022044 (PD201200429)
I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD
PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under
the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s
recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress
who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:
Encl
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Deputy Assistant Secretary
(Army Review Boards)
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00802
The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated chronic LBP as unfitting, rated 20%. The PEB and the VA both rated the back condition 20% using different codes. The Board agreed that the normal gait and posture, mild to moderate reduction in forward flexion, absence of spasm and normal motor, sensory and reflex findings on both exams confirmed the back condition to be mild to moderate.
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00744
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW CASE NUMBER: PD1200744 BOARD DATE: 20130314 NAME: X BRANCH OF SERVICE: MARINE CORPS SEPARATION DATE: 20011115 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was a U.S. Marine Corps active duty CPL/E-4(6531/Aviation Ordanceman) medically separated for chronic low back pain (LBP). RATING COMPARISON: PEB – Dated 20010921 Condition Chronic Low Back Pain Left Lateral Leg...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02161
Chronic Low Back Pain Condition .The CI experienced chronic low back pain that radiated into the right leg. The VA C&P examination noted a somewhat weakened hamstring muscle but lower extremity strength was otherwise normal and gait was normal.The Board also noted that the hamstring muscle is innervated by multiple spinal nerve roots L5, S1, S2 and S3 so significant weakness from a single nerve root is not expected. I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01020
Post-Separation) All Effective Date 20020906 Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam Chronic Low Back Pain w/out Neurologic Abnormality 5299-5295 10% Lower Back Condition with Bulging Disc at L4/L5 and Radiculopathy 5293 20% 20021010 .No Additional MEB/PEB Entries. The 2002 Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) coding and rating standards for the spine, which were in effect at the time of separation, were changed in late September 2002 regarding...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01273
Straight leg raises were negative for radicular symptoms and muscle strength and reflexes were normal.The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM)on24June 2004, noted the back pain was aggravated by bending, twisting, stooping, running and interfered with carrying heavy loads while marching.During examination thoracolumbar flexion ranged from 57 degrees anddecreased to 63 degrees, by the third repetition (57, 60, and 63). The Board directed attention to its rating recommendationbased on the above...
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00351
The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation. The “General Rating Formula for Diseases and Injuries of the Spine...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00117
Spine surgery evaluation concluded there was no indication for surgery.The MEB physical examination on29January 2002 (DD Form 2808) recorded “ROM 45 degrees anterior flexion” but did not specify whether this was lumbar spine or trunk motion.The orthopedic MEB narrative summary addendum examination on30March 2002, recorded back flexion with fingers reaching to mid shin (approximately 70 degrees), similar to the physical therapy examination the year previously.There was tenderness to palpation...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01815
The VA physical examination revealed normal gait and posture. The Board additionally considered if the symptomatic lower extremity radiculopathy warranted an additional disability rating; but, members agreed that the requisite link of the neuropathy symptoms with functional impairment was not in evidence. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02758
SEPARATION DATE: 20071123 Since then, he had noted re-aggravation of his LBP. The Board noted that the ROM for both the MEB and VA examinations supports a 20% rating, but the criteria for a 40% rating are not met.
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00994
The Board agreed that the ROM at the time of the C&P examination more nearly approximated the 10% rating than the 20% rating under VASRD diagnostic code 5292, limitation of motion (as well as current VASRD guidelines). The Board considered whether the right and left knee conditions, when considered alone and separate from the LBP condition, were unfitting for continued military service. After due deliberation in consideration of the totality of the evidence, the Board concluded that the...