Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01815
Original file (PD-2013-01815.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX         CASE: PD-2013-01815
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20140528
SEPARATION DATE: 20050909


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (21E/Heavy Construction Equipment Operator) medically separated for a chronic low back pain (LBP) condition. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The back condition, characterized as “lower back pain with herniated nucleus pulposus (herniated disc) at L5/S1 and sacral-Iliac (SI) joint pain secondary to degenerative joint disease (DJD),” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic low back pain, with L5-S1 disc protrusion, without neurologic abnormality” as a single unfitting condition, rated 10%. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “The CI elaborated no specific contention in his application.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting back condition is addressed below; and, no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20050805
 VA - (6 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Low Back Pain 5243 10% DDD L5-S1 and Sacroiliac Joints 5242 10% 20060320
MEB/PEB Entries X 0
 Other x 3 20060320
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 30%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 20060816 ( most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] ).


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Chronic Low Back Pain. The service treatment record (STR) reflected that the CI first experienced non-traumatic LBP in late 2002 and initially received chiropractic treatments in early 2004. His LBP continued with frequent radicular pain symptoms into both legs; right greater than left. Despite additional physical therapy and local injections, his pain persisted throughout the balance of his career. Radiologic work-up was significant for degenerative disc disease (DDD) of the lumbosacral spine; specifically at L5-S1. His condition was considered non-surgical by orthopedics and neurosurgery and remained under the care of pain management. Electro-diagnostic tests were normal. Having normal studies coupled with a normal motor/strength examination; a spinal related lower extremity radiculopathy was ruled out. Multiple STR entries documented the presence of mild back spasms with a normal gait. There were no periods of incapacitation. The MEB narrative summary examination (6 weeks pre-separation), noted his chief complaint as “continuous pain radiating down right leg.” He endorsed a constant sharp, burning LBP “extending down the right leg all the time.” “He cannot run, jump, do sit-ups or push-ups.” His symptoms were aggravated with prolonged sitting and standing. The physical examination revealed low back spasm, tenderness about the right SI joint, pain-positive right straight leg raise and limited range-of-motion (ROM). His gait was “slow movement favoring his left leg.” His heel and toe walk was normal. The diagnosis was LBP with L5-S1 herniated disc and his pain rating was “slight.” At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination (6 months after separation), the CI reported intermittent “dull to sharp” LBP worse with prolonged sitting and or standing. He denied numbness, weakness, or bowel/bladder complaints. The VA physical examination revealed normal gait and posture. ROM was mildly decreased with painful motion and Deluca was positive for pain, weakness, fatigue, and lack of endurance. Back spasm or radicular pain component was not present. He was neurologically intact. The diagnosis was DDD of L5-S1 without radiculopathy. The goniometric ROM evaluations in evidence which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, are summarized in the chart below.

DOS 20050909
Thoracolumbar ROM
(Degrees)		 MEB ~ 1.5 Mo. Pre-Sep
(20060320)
 VA C&P ~ 6 Mo. Post-Sep
(20060320)
Flexion (90 Normal) 75 80
Extension (30) 30 30
R Lat Flexion (30) 23 30
L Lat Flexion (30) 28 30
R Rotation (30) 30 30
L Rotation (30) 30 30
Combined (240) 216 230
Comment back spasm; tenderness; +SLR; slow gait painful motion; +Deluca;
§4.71a Rating 10 % 10%

The Board directs attenti on to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence . Although the PEB and VA titled the unfitting back condition slightly differently, they both utilized similar codes of 5243 ( i ntervertebral disc syndrome) and 5242 (degenerative arthritis) respectively; both citing limited motion. Board members agreed that sufficient evidence of limited ROM was present to justify the rating of 10%, as well as the presence of localized tenderness and spasm not resulting in abnormal gait or spinal contour IAW §4.71a. Board members also considered application of §4.40 (functional loss) which states “a part which becomes painful on use must be regarded as seriously disabled” as seen on the VA examination as painful motion and posi tive Deluca; but probative value was highest for the MEB examination , as it clearly was time relevant to separation. There are no available alternative or analogous coding options which are applicable and / or advantageous to the CI’s current 10% rating. The Board additionally considered if the symptomatic lower extremity radiculopathy warranted an additional disability rating; but, members agreed that the requisite link of the neuropathy symptoms with functional impairment was not in evidence. The pain component of a radiculopathy is subsumed under the general spine rating as specified in §4.71a. Considering the totality of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), members agreed that a disability rating of 10% for the LBP condition was appropriately recommended in this case .


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the LBP condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 10%, coded 5243 IAW VASRD §4.71a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20131021, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record




                                   
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review


 SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150001002 (PD201301815)

I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00615

    Original file (PD2011-00615.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was Reserve HM2/E-5 (HN/8404), medically separated for discogenic low back pain (LBP). Other PEB Conditions .

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01973

    Original file (PD-2013-01973.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After aggressive physical therapy, LIMDU statusand three spinal [steroid] injections the CI did had mild symptoms improvement but continued to experience intermittent back pain and had persisted abnormal foot sensation throughout the balance of his career.Surgical intervention was not recommended and there were no reports of incapacitation.The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) dated 8 April 2005 (5 months prior to separation),the examiner noted tenderness and spasm of the left lower back and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 00200

    Original file (PD 2013 00200.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The examination noted bilateral lumbar muscle tenderness and limited range-of-motion (ROM) and reported a diagnosis of “acute lumbosacral strain/sprain with (+) [right] SLR test.” The permanent (L3) profile listed the diagnosis as back pain, but also with herniated disc (HNP) with radiculopathy, and severely restricted the CI from activities. The VA C&P examination, a month after separation, noted a positive straight leg raise test in the right leg (indicative of radiculopathy),(4/5)...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00886

    Original file (PD-2014-00886.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) neurological examination noted that initially the CI had normal lumbar x-rays and was treated with physical therapy. At the VA C&P examinations reviewed, both on the same daya year after separation, the CI’s exam noted muscle spasm and TL ROM of flexion of 40 degrees with pain to 80 degrees and a combined ROM of 225 degreesand normal sensation at the neuro exam, whereas the general exam noted only “pain with motion” with decreased LLE sensation. At the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02260

    Original file (PD-2013-02260.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The examiner also noted that the CI had a normal gait, no muscle spasm and pain rating was recorded as moderate / intermittentIAW the American Medical Association.The MEB’s history and physical examinationdocumenteddecreased ROM of the lumbar spine with tenderness to palpation and decreased sensation in the right lower extremity.The MEB NARSUM physical exam findings were summarized in the chart above.The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination (performed a month post separation),...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01435

    Original file (PD2012 01435.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    No physical examination findings were documented. Although the DA 199 mentioned characteristic pain on motion, which supports a 10% disability rating using either the 2003 or the current VASRD, the PEB assigned a 0% rating.The VA determined that neither the back pain nor the left leg radiculopathy was service-connected or service aggravated. Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00351

    Original file (PD-2014-00351.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation. The “General Rating Formula for Diseases and Injuries of the Spine...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01781

    Original file (PD-2014-01781.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The NARSUM exam was further away from the date of separation, did not have goniometric ROM testing (no measured numbers IAW VASRD §4.2), did not address receptive motion or DeLuca criteria, and did not mention posture,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00591

    Original file (PD2011-00591.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB forwarded no other conditions for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication. The CI was medically separated with a 20% disability rating. On examination, the surgeon documented normal gait, strength, reflexes and sensation and concluded the back pain was “mechanical pain to testing.” He noted the MRI findings with multilevel spondylitic disease (degenerative disc and joint) and thought that some of the pain was discogenic in nature, and possibly an annular tear at L5-S1.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD2014 01618

    Original file (PD2014 01618.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    on the left; Normal sensory; mild right leg weakness; reflexes symmetric ; Pos. Contended Mental Health Condition .The Board reviewed the evidence for any indication that a MH condition existed at the time of separation and if so, to render a rating recommendation if that condition was adjudged to be unfitting at the time of separation. Physical Disability Board of Review