RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW
BRANCH OF SERVICE: MARINE CORPS
NAME:
CASE NUMBER: PD1200311 SEPARATION DATE: 20090830
BOARD DATE: 20121108
SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this
covered individual (CI) was a mobilized Reserve SGT/E-5 (1361/Drafting and Survey NCOIC),
medically separated for a left foot condition, (severe debilitating plantar fasciitis). He did not
respond adequately to conservative treatment and was unable to fulfill the physical demands
perform within his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS), meet worldwide deployment
standards or meet physical fitness standards. He was placed on limited duty and underwent a
Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). Plantar fasciitis was forwarded to the Informal Physical
Evaluation Board (IPEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E. No other conditions appeared on the MEB’s
submission. The IPEB adjudicated the left foot condition as unfitting, rated 10%, with
application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI appealed to
the Formal PEB (FPEB), which affirmed the IPEB findings; and was then medically separated
with a 10% disability rating.
CI CONTENTION: “Left Achilles tendonopathy, neck strain, chronic low back strain with
spondylosis and radiating pain left leg and foot, bilateral plantar fasciitis. I believe that I should
have been medically retired from the Marine Corps instead of receiving an Administrative
medical discharge. I was rated 30% initially by the VA. I served 12 years with the intent of
retiring from the Marine Corps and I fought to stay in.”
SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in DoDI
6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2) is limited to those conditions which were determined
by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the
CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB.” The ratings
for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases. The other requested conditions, neck
strain, low back pain and right foot plantar fasciitis are not within the Board’s purview. Any
conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s
defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of
Naval Records.
RATING COMPARISON:
VA (9 Mos. Post-Separation) – All Effective Date 20091016
ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board acknowledges the CI’s contention that suggests ratings should
have been conferred for other conditions documented at the time of separation and therefore
Service FPEB – Dated 20090528
Condition
Code
Severe Debilitating Plantar
Fasciitis
5399-5310
Rating
10%
↓No Additional MEB/PEB Entries↓
Combined: 10%
Condition
Left Achilles Tendinopathy
Neck Strain
Chronic Low Back Pain
Code
5099-5024
5237
5237
Rating
10%
10%
10%
Exam
20100521
20100521
20100521
20100521
0% X 3 / Not Service-Connected x 2
Combined: 30%
should have been medically retired from the Marine Corps. The Board wishes to clarify that it is
subject to the same laws for disability entitlements as those under which the Disability
Evaluation System (DES) operates. While the DES considers all of the member's medical
conditions, compensation can only be offered for those medical conditions that cut short a
member’s career, and then only to the degree of severity present at the time of final
disposition. However the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of
laws (Title 38, United States Code), is empowered to compensate all service-connected
conditions and to periodically reevaluate said conditions for the purpose of adjusting the
Veteran’s disability rating should the degree of impairment vary over time.
Severe Debilitating Plantar Fasciitis Condition. The CI first sought care for lower extremity pain
in July 2007, (calf and foot symptoms) and was conservatively treated for left Achilles tendonitis
with non-steroidal medications and physical therapy. He deployed to Iraq and his symptoms
worsened despite several cortisone injections. Upon redeployment he was evaluated and
treated by several specialists to include orthopedics, pain management, and physical therapy
for persistence disabling plantar fasciitis which was confirmed by a magnetic resonance imaging
(MRI) study. He underwent further additional conservative treatment which included the use
of a controlled ankle motion (CAM) walker, then complete rest with prolong casting, shoe
inserts, and several treatments with orthotripsy for a left calcaneal spur noted on X-ray. Due to
the persistence of symptoms and reported intermittent back pain an evaluation for sciatica was
also completed to exclude as a cause for his foot pain. The MRI study of the lumbar spine was
normal and the conclusion was no objective evidence that his foot pain was being caused by his
back. After exhausting multiple treatment options without success, the CI was referred to an
MEB. The service treatment record (STR) noted reported pain scales of 5 and 6 of 10 in
intensity. The non-medical assessment documented the CI was working in his MOS, not
worldwide deployable and missing 55 hours per week for treatment of his medical condition.
The MEB physical exam demonstrated generalized decrease in sensation of the left foot, mild
symptomatic pes planus and diminished deep tendon reflex of the left Achilles compared to the
right. At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam performed after separation, the CI
reported bilateral constant sharp and throbbing pain in the heels all the time, worse with
weight bearing, left achilles tendon pain only with weight bearing and relief of pain with non-
steroidal medication and rest. He reported limitations in standing and walking after 1.5 hours
and an inability to do sports or run. He worked at Lowes, had no loss of work, and no
incapacitation episodes. The C&P exam demonstrated bilateral pes planus, normal gait with
heel and squat maneuvers, tenderness of the bilateral medial aspect of the foot to the heel,
some guarding, tenderness of the left Achilles with normal alignment and no guarding and no
abnormal calluses. X-ray of the left foot revealed a plantar calcaneal heel spur and minimal
arthritic changes of the first metatarsal phalangeal joint.
The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The
PEB and VA chose different coding options for the condition, but this did not bear on rating.
The PEB assigned a 10% rating coded 5310 for moderate pain under VASRD §4.73—Schedule of
Ratings–Muscle Injuries. The Board agreed the evidence did not support the moderate severe
pain criteria under this code for a higher rating. The VA assigned a 10% rating coded 5024 for
painful or limited motion of a major joint or group of minor joints which is consistent §4.71a—
schedule of ratings–musculoskeletal system. There is no evidence of documentation of
incapacitating episodes or ratable peripheral nerve impairment which would provide for
additional or higher rating. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful
of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to
recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the left foot condition.
2 PD1200311
BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or
guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were
inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not
surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD
were exercised. In the matter of the left foot condition and IAW VASRD §4.73, the Board
unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions
within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.
RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of
the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:
VASRD CODE RATING
5399-5310
COMBINED
10%
10%
President
Physical Disability Board of Review
Severe Debilitating Plantar Fasciitis
UNFITTING CONDITION
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120321, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record
3 PD1200311
MEMORANDUM FOR DIRECTOR, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY COUNCIL
OF REVIEW BOARDS
Subj: PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR) RECOMMENDATIONS
Ref: (a) DoDI 6040.44
(b) CORB ltr dtd 26 Nov 12
In accordance with reference (a), I have reviewed the cases forwarded by reference (b), and,
for the reasons provided in their forwarding memorandum, approve the recommendations of
the PDBR that the following individual’s records not be corrected to reflect a change in either
characterization of separation or in the disability rating previously assigned by the Department
of the Navy’s Physical Evaluation Board:
- former USN
- former USMC
- former USMC
- former USMC
- former USMC
Assistant General Counsel
(Manpower & Reserve Affairs)
4 PD1200311
AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00045
The Board considered rating the left ankle degeneration separately, but determined the rear-foot pain was best considered as degenerative changes of the left rear foot which also contributed to the limitation of ankle motion from the plantar fasciitis. The Board recommends no additional separately unfitting foot or ankle condition, or change in the PEB adjudications other than PF, and all symptoms were considered under the separate 5399-5310 coding ratings above. Exhibit C. Department of...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-01102
The PEB adjudicated the bilateral, plantar fasciitis and bilateral flat feet conditions as unfitting, rated 0%, with application of the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. It noted the progression of the bilateral foot pain despite conservative treatment and limitation of activities; “currently, her feet still hurt and she is not doing any high impact activities but the pain is starting to increase.” The examination documented bilateral pes planus and tenderness on...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02563
Right Foot/Lower ExtremityCondition (Heel Spur, Plantar Fasciitis, Hammer Toe,Achilles and Gastroc-Soleus Tendinitis) .The service treatment record (STR) contains a routine exam entry from 1997 (same year as enlistment) documenting hallux valgus (bunion deformity of the big toe); and, a clinic note from the same year noting a 4-month history of bilateral foot pain. The PEB rated the right foot condition analogously under 5279 (metatarsalgia) which provides for a maximum rating of 10%, under...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01817
The rating for the unfitting chronic recurrent plantar fasciitis bilaterally and equinus deformity bilaterally conditions are addressed below;no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. When considering a separate rating for each condition, the Board considers each bundled condition to be reasonably justified as separately unfitting unless a preponderance of evidence indicates the condition would not cause the member to be referred into the Disability...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00031
Bilateral Foot/Ankle Condition . The MEB physical exam demonstrated; a slow gait, bilateral tenderness of the ankles, increased pain along the posterior region of the left ankle, negative medial and lateral pain of the right ankle, bilateral tenderness over the plantar fascia and also on the area of the medial heads of the calcaneus (heel bone), bilateral pes planus (flat foot), a scar on the left big toe, without erythema, edema or instability of the ankles. RECOMMENDATION : The Board,...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00900
The PEB adjudicated the chronic bilateral plantar fasciitis as unfitting, rated 0%, with likely application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. The ankle condition will be considered by the Board as it relates to the unfitting bilateral plantar fasciitis condition. RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CIs prior determination be modified as follows; and, that the discharge with severance pay be recharacterized to reflect permanent disability retirement,...
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00091
The left foot conditions, characterized as “symptomatic pes planus on the left foot” and “left plantar fasciitis” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Plantar Fasciitis Left Foot w/ Congenital Pes Planus5399-53100%Left Foot Plantar Fasciitis and Pes Planus52760%*20060102Other x1 (Not in Scope)Other x7 Combined: 0%Combined: 40%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20060410(most proximate to date...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00993
The CI was medically separated with a 10% disability rating. Post-Separation) – All Effective Date 20070801 Service Recon PEB – Dated 20070702 Condition Code Rating No Separate VA Entry (see 9434 below and 5025 above) Code 5025 8100 5010-5237 5024-5284 5024-5284 6847 9434 7101 6260 5201-5024 Rating 10%* 30% 10% 10% 10% 50% 50% 0% 10% 10% Exam 20080219 20080219 20080219 20080219 20080219 20080212 20080201 20080219 20080219 20080206 Not Service Connected 7399-7346 6820 5010-5237 7899-7806 No...
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00428
The rating for the unfitting bilateral foot condition is addressed below. The Board first considered whether each foot condition remained separately unfitting, having decoupled them from the combined PEB adjudication.The evidence clearly established that the right foot was more impaired than the left foot. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01298
CI CONTENTION : “I was found unfit for the Army for the medical condition Bilateral Plantar Fasciitis with slight pes planus. Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Bilateral Foot Pain with Plantar Fasciitis5399-53100%Bilateral Plantar Fasciitis with Slight Pes Planus and Slight Hallux Valgus5299-527610%20050110Other x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 9 (Not in Scope)20050110 Combined: 0%Combined: 20%*Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20050311 ( most proximate to date...