RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW
NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY
CASE NUMBER: PD1201246 SEPARATION DATE: 20030731
BOARD DATE: 20130305
SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this
covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (11B, Infantry), medically separated for
Chronic pain in left hallux, first metatarsal (foot pain). The CI injured his left foot great toe
jumping out of his bunk while in training in April 2002 and was diagnosed with metatarsalgia of
the left great toe. The CI did not improve adequately with treatment and was unable to meet
the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness
standards. He was issued a permanent L3 Profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board
(MEB). The MEB forwarded no other conditions for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB)
adjudication. The PEB adjudicated the chronic pain in left hallux, first metatarsal condition as
unfitting, rated 0%. The CI made no appeals, and was medically separated with disability
severance pay.
CI CONTENTION: Metatarsalgia is a permanent condition which initially occurred during a
training exercise while on duty. The onset was acute and well-documented. The condition was
the reason for my medial (sic) board separation and it painfully persists almost I0 years later. I
also received a disability rating from Veterans' Affairs within 12 months after my medical
discharge.
SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in DoDI
6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e. (2) is limited to those conditions which were determined
by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the
CI, those condition(s) identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB. The ratings
for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases. The rated condition chronic pain in left
hallux, first metatarsal, as requested for consideration is the only condition that meets the
criteria prescribed in DoDI 6040.44 for Board purview; and, is addressed below. Any conditions
or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Boards defined scope
of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Army Board for Correction of Military
Records.
RATING COMPARISON:
Service PEB Dated 20030625
VA (3 Mos. Post-Separation) All Effective Date 20030801
Condition
Code
Rating
Condition
Code
Rating
Exam
Chronic Pain in Left Hallux,
First Metatarsal
5099-5003
0%
Chronic Myoligamentous Strain,
Left Foot
5284
10%
20031119
Combined: 0%
Combined: 10%
ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Disability Evaluation System (DES) is responsible for maintaining a fit
and vital fighting force. While the DES considers all of the member's medical conditions,
compensation can only be offered for those medical conditions that cut short a members
career, and then only to the degree of severity present at the time of final disposition. The DES
has neither the role nor the authority to compensate service members for anticipated future
severity or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical separation nor for
conditions determined to be service-connected by the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA)
but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB. However the DVA, operating under a different
set of laws (Title 38, United States Code), is empowered to compensate all service-connected
conditions and to periodically re-evaluate said conditions for the purpose of adjusting the
Veterans disability rating should the degree of impairment vary over time. The Boards role is
confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB
rating determinations, compared to VASRD standards, based on severity at the time of
separation.
Chronic Pain in Left Hallux, First Metatarsal Condition. The narrative summary (NARSUM) notes
the CI reported complaints of left foot pain for 7 to 8 months that had progressively worsened
since initial onset. The first note in his medical records of left foot pain was on 18 April 2002
after jumping out of a bunk bed and injuring his left great toe. At that time he was diagnosed
with left first metatarsalgia, painful left great toe metatarsal phalangeal joint (MTP joint). The
X-rays were normal and a bone scan (October 2002) demonstrated minimal increased
radiotracer activity in the greater toe as opposed to other toes. Activity limiting pain persisted
despite treatment with rest, immobilization, medication and injection. The 9 December 2002
Podiatric evaluation recommended continued non-surgical treatment. A clinic examination on
3 January 2003 recorded no swelling, full range-of-motion (ROM) but with pain with great toe
MTP joint flexion beyond 60 degrees. At the time of the MEB history and physical examination,
10 March 2003, the CI reported left toe pain with weight bearing. The left first MTP toe joint
was tender on examination. The MEB NARSUM examination on 3 April 2003 also recorded
tenderness. At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination, 19 November 2003, 3
months after separation, the CI reported chronic left foot pain, aching in nature and varying in
intensity depending on activity. The pain was localized adjacent to the left great toe. On
examination there was painful soft tissue swelling on palpation of the dorsum of the left foot
immediately adjacent to the great toe. There was normal dorsiflexion and plantar flexion of the
great toe. Gait was steady. X-ray of the left foot showed no fracture, dislocation, or any
other bone abnormality.
The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The
PEB rated the left toe pain condition 0% coded 5003. The VA rated left foot pain 10% coded
5284 for other foot injuries. The Board noted the unfitting condition was pain of the left first
MTP joint. There was no hallux rigidus, hallux valgus, or fractures. The Board agreed that
VASRD diagnostic code 5279, metatarsalgia best matched the unfitting left great toe pain
condition. Although there was no limitation of motion, there was pain to palpation and with
use supporting the 10% rating available under diagnostic code 5279. The board considered the
5284 diagnostic code used by the VA however a rating higher than 10% was not supported by
the preponderance of evidence. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and
mindful of VASRD §4.3 (Resolution of reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability
rating of 10% for the left hallux chronic metatarsalgia condition (5279).
BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or
guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were
inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. In the matter of the
chronic pain left hallux first metatarsal condition, the Board unanimously recommends a
disability rating of 10% coded 5279 IAW VASRD §4.71a. There were no other conditions within
the Boards scope of review for consideration.
RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CIs prior determination be modified as
follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:
UNFITTING CONDITION
VASRD CODE
RATING
Chronic Pain Left Hallux First Metatarsal
5279
10%
COMBINED
10%
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120703, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, DAF
Acting Director
Physical Disability Board of Review
SFMR-RB
MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(TAPD-ZB / xxxxxxxxxxx), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557
SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, AR20130007738 (PD201201246)
1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of
Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the
subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a,
I accept the Boards recommendation to modify the individuals disability rating to 10%
without recharacterization of the individuals separation. This decision is final.
2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be
corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.
3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided
to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have
shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this
memorandum without enclosures.
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:
Encl xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Deputy Assistant Secretary
(Army Review Boards)
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 01026
No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The PEB adjudicated “hallux limitus”as unfitting rating each great toe separately at 10% with a 20% combined rating, which included the bilateral factor. The remainder of the foot and ankle examination was normal.The MEB NARSUM concluded with diagnoses of hallux limitus (decreased motion of the toe) and metatarsal head metatarsalgia (pain at the base of the great toe). There was painful motion of the great toes, but the remainder of the foot...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00295
The right great toe condition was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) as two diagnoses (“joint pain, localized right 1st MTP [metatarsal-phalangeal] joint” and “hallux limitus of the right great toe”) characterized as separate medically unacceptable conditions IAW AR 40-501. SCOPE OF REVIEW : The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 6040.44 is limited to those conditions which were determined by the PEB to...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00128
The VA, in its rating decision of 7 October 2003, utilized code 5242, degenerative arthritis of the spine, as per the current VASRD rating guidelines in effect at that time.The VA rating decision dated 29 July 2003, 2 months proximate to the date of separation, rated the CI’s condition at 0%, based upon an examination that revealed neither painful nor limited motion. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02609
The bilateral foot condition, characterized as “metatarsalgia, bilateral feet” and “neuroma, left foot,” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.A second MEB changed the “neuroma, left foot” to “neuroma, right foot.” No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB (IPEB) adjudicated “chronic bilateral foot pain diagnosed as metatarsalgia with left sided neuroma, status post neurectomy”as unfitting, rated 10%, with likely application of the Veterans...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00503
Should the Board judge that any contested condition was most likely incompatible with the specific duty requirements, a disability rating will be recommended IAW the VASRD and based on the degree of disability evidenced at separation. The range-of-motion (ROM) of the feet was noted to be good. X-rays were normal other than bilateral mild hammer toes of the second and third digits; this is a separate condition from the bilateral hallux valgus. RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00620
The PEB adjudicated the bilateral foot pain and bilateral hallux valgusconditionsas a single unfitting condition, rated 10%, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The remaining conditions were determined to be not unfitting.The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. The VA rated the bilateral foot condition separately as hallux valgus, coded5280, at 10% for each foot for a combined rating of 20%. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44,...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01817
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE: PD1201817 BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY BOARD DATE: 20130315 SEPARATION DATE: 20050114 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (92A/Automated Logistical Specialist), medically separated for a left foot condition. The left foot condition, characterized as status post left foot bunionectomy with chronic pain,...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01261
DoDI 6040.44 provides for consideration of post-separation VA findings, particularly within 12 months of separation, although the Board’s recommendation is premised on the degree of disability at separation. The VA’s (belated) 10% rating was under code 5284 (foot injuries, other) for “moderate disability,” which offers a 20% rating for “moderately severe” and 30% for “severe.”Members agreed, that IAW VASRD §4.7 (higher of two evaluations), 5003 was not the optimal code for rating in this...
AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-01176
The Informal PEB (IPEB) adjudicated the chronic right foot pain due to Morton’s neuroma condition as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Although there were examination findings of hallux valgus and hammer toes (single toes) there were no symptoms or impairment attributed to these abnormalities that would warrant rating under VASRD codes 5280 or 5282, and, if rated using these codes, would not attain a minimum...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00984
The right hallux valgus/limitus condition (bunion surgery and post-surgical result) was the principle cause of the right foot pain surgery and chronic right foot pain and was considered in rating the CI’s primary unfitting foot pain condition. The VA exam summary for pes planus is discussed above and all symptoms from the pes planus condition were considered in the rating of the foot pain condition. In the matter of the contended pes planus and hallux valgus conditions, the Board...