Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00772
Original file (PD-2012-00772.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX               CASE: PD-2012-00772
BRANCH OF SERVICE: MARINE CORPS           BOARD DATE: 20130321
SEPARATION DATE: 20010915


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects this covered individual (CI) was an active duty Lance Corporal/E-3 (2881/Cryptographic Repairman) medically separated for a herniated disk. The CI had an onset of mid-thoracic back pain during a training exercise in 1999. In May 2000, a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of his thoracic spine showed a right para-central disk bulge at T9-10. He was not a surgical candidate and his condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty or physical fitness standards, so he was placed on limited duty and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The MEB forwarded “thoracic back pain and herniated disk…” to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The PEB adjudicated the herniated disk condition as unfitting, rated 20%. The thoracic back pain condition was determined to be Category II ( a condition that contributed to the unfitting condition ) . The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “Upon review of the documents in my file, XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX stated on my Physical Evaluation Board Proceedings, under additional findings clearly stated that my disability is permanent. It is also documented clearly in my medical records that is included in my VA File and copies submitted with this request that my condition is continually getting worse along with my quality of life is declining. The initial findings only listed as 20% lumbar for one injury. A secondary review listed a second condition at 10% (thoracic). In 2011, Rating decision only provided increase for 1 injury (lumbar) but did not review for thoracic injury (#2).”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting the thoracic herniated disk condition is addressed below; no additional conditions, are within the Board’s defined DoDI 6040.44 purview. The lumbar, or low back condition, was not identified by the PEB so is not in the purview of this board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Naval Records. .


RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20010723
 VA - Exam ~ 1 Mos. Pre-Separation
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Herniated Disk, Recalcitrant to Conservative Measures 5299-5293 20% Herniated Nucleus Pulposus of Thoracic Spine T9-10 5293 20% 20010808
Thoracic Back Pain Category II
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
 Degenerative Disc Disease, Lumbar Spine, L3-4 5010-5292 10% 20010808
Combined: 20%
 Combined: 30%


ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board acknowledges the CI’s information regarding the significant impairment with which his service-connected condition continues to burden him, but must emphasize that the Disability Evaluation System has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for later severity or complications of conditions that caused medical separation. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, which operates under a different set of laws

Several recent VA rating decisions (VARDS) and portions of Compensation and Pension (C&P) examinations were not available in evidence prior to the Board and could not be located after appropriate inquiries.

Back Condition. The CI developed mid-back pain during exercise in 1988. Thoracic spine X-rays performed in January 1999 were suggestive of early arthritic changes, but were noted to be “not sufficient to make a diagnosis.” Follow-up X-rays in March 2000 were reported as “normal.” Bone scan of April 2000 showed no disease process. An MRI of the thoracic spine of May 2000 revealed a small disc bulge in the mid back (T9-10) mildly compressing the thoracic spinal cord. On orthopedic evaluation in June 2000, motor and reflex exams were normal and surgical intervention was not recommended. At the MEB/narrative summary exam of 27 April 2001, 5 months prior to separation, the CI reported continued mid back pain with exacerbation when lifting more than 25 pounds or doing more than 25 sit-ups. The MEB physical exam noted a normal gait, “full” flexion of the back, normal strength and reflexes in all extremities. On review of the X-rays of 2000, the examiner opined that some “endplate” irregularities (consistent with early arthritis) of the mid thoracic vertebrae were present. At the VA C&P exam on 8 August 2001, performed a month prior to separation, the CI reported constant back pain improved by changing positions. On physical examination the CI was in no apparent distress. Posture and gait were normal without assistive devices. He was noted to be able to “sit up from a supine position and transfer from chair to examining table without difficulty.” Mild muscle tenderness with spasm in the mid and low back areas was present. There was some evidence of muscle weakness in the mid back area, but motor, sensory and reflex examinations were normal. Range-of-motion (ROM) of the lumbar spine was normal without pain, weakness or lack of endurance.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The 2002 VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) coding and rating standards for the spine differ significantly from the current §4.71a general rating formula for the spine. The earlier criteria were subject to the rater’s opinion regarding degree of severity, as opposed to the more objective current standards with quantifiable rating thresholds grounded in ROM measurements. IAW DoDI 6040.44 the Board must apply the spine rules in effect at time of separation. Both the PEB and VA rated the back pain condition, code 5293 (intervertebral disc syndrome), as 20% (moderate). The next higher rating under this code (40%) requires the condition to be “severe,” which was considered by the Board to not be supported by the record in evidence. The Board unanimously agreed that no higher rating than 20% could be achieved under code 5291 (limitation of thoracic ROM) or any other applicable back code. The Board further agreed that the second PEB entry, thoracic back pain, was subsumed under the intervertebral disc condition and not subject to additional rating. The Board considered whether any additional rating could be recommended under a peripheral nerve code. Firm Board precedent requires a functional impairment linked to fitness to support a recommendation for addition of a peripheral nerve rating to Service disability in spine cases. The pain component of a radiculopathy is subsumed under the general spine rating as specified in §4.71a. The sensory component in this case has no functional implication and no motor weakness was in evidence. Thus, the Board could support a recommendation for an additional disability rating on this basis. The Board was unable to find any other applicable codes for consideration. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the thoracic back condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the mid back pain, and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends no recharacterization of the disability and separation determination.


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120604, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record








                 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review
MEMORANDUM FOR DIRECTOR, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY COUNCIL OF REVIEW BOARDS
Subj:    PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR) RECOMMENDATION
Ref: (a) DoDI 6040.44
         (b) CORB ltr dtd 4 Aug 14

In accordance with reference (a), I have reviewed the cases forwarded by reference (b), and, for the reasons provided in their forwarding memorandums, approve the recommendations of the PDBR that the following individual's records not be corrected to reflect a change in either characterization of separation or in the disability rating previously assigned by the Department of the Navy' s Physical Evaluation Board:

-        XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC
-        XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , former USMC
-        XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC
-        XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC







XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Assistant General Counsel
(Manpower & Reserve Affairs)

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00027

    Original file (PD2012-00027.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    rating.” The VA chose to bundle the thoracic and lumbar spines together and rate for residual pain which is consistent IAW §4.71a which cites “With or without symptoms such as pain (whether or not it radiates), stiffness, or aching in the area of the spine affected by residuals of injury or disease.” The PEB assigned a 10% rating with code 8719 (neuralgia, long thoracic nerve) for the mid back based on T8 dermatomal pain, sensory loss and objective evidence of a T8-T9 HNP. The Board...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01457

    Original file (PD2012 01457.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI requested a reconsideration of the IPEB findings after which the IPEB found the CI unfit for his low back condition, rated 10%. Subsequent multiple VA physical therapy records ranging to the end of 2002,within the 12-month window specified in DoDI 6040.44 regarding VA evaluations for Board consideration, did not demonstrate any deterioration in the CI’s condition, although the Board noted that the CI continued to have ongoing low back pain that was being treated with non-steroidal...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01648

    Original file (PD-2012-01648.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated “Degenerative disc disease T7-8 ” as unfitting and rated 10%. CI CONTENTION: The application states “Depression, degenerative disk disease, total rating 100%.” The application does not elaborate or specify a request for Board consideration of any additional conditions. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING Thoracic...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00117

    Original file (PD2013 00117.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Spine surgery evaluation concluded there was no indication for surgery.The MEB physical examination on29January 2002 (DD Form 2808) recorded “ROM 45 degrees anterior flexion” but did not specify whether this was lumbar spine or trunk motion.The orthopedic MEB narrative summary addendum examination on30March 2002, recorded back flexion with fingers reaching to mid shin (approximately 70 degrees), similar to the physical therapy examination the year previously.There was tenderness to palpation...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01518

    Original file (PD2012 01518.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active dutyAC2/E-5 (6902/Air Traffic Controller),medically separated for multilevel degenerative disk disease (DDD), lumbar and herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP), C5-C6, left. Since no evidence of functional impairment exists in this case, the Board cannot support a recommendation for additional rating based on peripheral nerve impairment at the time of separation from...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | pd-2012-00915

    Original file (pd-2012-00915.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY SEPARATION DATE: 20020709 NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE NUMBER: PD1200915 BOARD DATE: 20121206 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E‐4 (92R/Parachute Rigger), medically separated for chronic mid and lower back pain with degenerative disc disease thoracic and lumbar spines. Any conditions or contention not requested...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00627

    Original file (PD-2012-00627.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pre-Separation) Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam Mid Thoracic Pain w/Compression Fracture with Schmorl’s Nodes 5299-5295 10% T6 Compression Fracture w/Insomnia 5285-5291 20% 20020709 Right Hip Pain (trochanteric bursitis) Not Unfitting Right Hip Greater Trochantitis 5252 0%* 20020709 Somatic Dysfunction of Cervico-thoracic and rib areas Not Unfitting No VA Entry No Additional MEB/PEB Entries Other x 3 20020709 Rating: 10% Rating: 20% Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00239

    Original file (PD2012-00239.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    (2) is limited to those conditions which were determined by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB.” The service ratings for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases; in this case, chronic mechanical low back pain. The PEB disability description was “chronic mechanical low back pain due to lumbar DDD, without neurologic abnormality or documented...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-00696

    Original file (PD-2013-00696.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The chronic neck and lumbar pain conditions, characterized as “cervical spine pain and lumbar spine pain” and “mild degenerative disk disease (DDD), cervical spine,” were the only conditions forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic neck pain,” and “chronic lumbar pain”as unfitting, rated 10% and 10% respectively, with likely application ofthe Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appeals and was...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00496

    Original file (PD2010-00496.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VA considered the mild left lower extremity weakness noted at the C&P exam in their 10% rating for the lumbar spine condition. Other PEB Conditions. In the matter of the thoracic disc, neck injury headaches, adjustment disorder and tinnitus conditions or any other medical conditions eligible for Board consideration, the Board unanimously agrees that it cannot recommend any findings of unfit for additional rating at separation.