Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00194
Original file (PD2009-00194.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: BRANCH OF SERVICE: NAVY

CASE NUMBER: PD0900194 BOARD DATE: 20100310

SEPARATION DATE: 20051114

________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY OF CASE: This covered individual (CI) was a Petty Officer First Class (Information Systems), medically separated from the Navy in 2005 after 9 years of service. The medical basis for the separation was Residual Gastrocsoleus Pain. The CI was referred to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), found unfit for continued naval service, and separated at 20% disability using the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Ratings Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Naval and Department of Defense regulations.

________________________________________________________________

CI CONTENTION: The CI states: “I have other service connected rating elements which are covered via the VA which should be re-evaluated by the PDBR.”

________________________________________________________________

RATING COMPARISON:

Service PEB VA (2 Mo. Pre- Separation)
Condition Code Rating Date Condition Code Rating Exam Effective
Residual Gastrocsoleus Pain (10% each side with bilateral factor ADDED) 5399-5312-8723 20% 20050815 Residuals, Status Post Compartment Syndrome Release, Right Calf 5399-5312

10%

10%

20050921

20061205

20051115

Bilateral Exertional Compartment Syndrome,

Surgically Treated

Cat II na 20050815 Residuals, Status Post Compartment Syndrome Release, Left Calf 5399-5312

10%

10%

20050921

20061205

20051115
Lower leg nerve damage 8624 NSC
Not in DES Torn Anterior Cruciate Ligament, Right Knee 5257 20% 20050921 20051115
Not in DES Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) 6847

30%

50%

20050921

20070625

20051115

20070506

NARSUM Pes Planus 5276

10%

10%

20050921

20061205

20051115
Not in DES Residuals s/p Fracture 5th DIP, Right Hand 5320 0% 20050921 20051115
Not in DES Hypertension 7101 0% 20050921 20051115
Not in DES Benign Cyst, right kidney with history of kidney stones 7529 0% 20050921 20051115
In NARSUM Scar, Left Lower Leg 7805 0% 20050921 20051115
Scar, Right Lower Leg 7805 0% 20050921 20051115
Not in DES Migraines 8100 0% 20050921 20051115
TOTAL Combined: 20% TOTAL Combined (Includes Non-PEB Conditions): 60%

ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Condition 1: Bilateral Leg Pain

The CI had symptomatic bilateral lower extremity compartment syndrome that was treated with bilateral four compartment fasciotomies in 2003. After his surgeries, he had relief of his previous symptoms but developed a new pain in the back of both calves which did not resolve over the two to three years prior to his narrative summary (NARSUM) in 2005. He had constant pain that increased significantly with any activity. He had difficulty performing the duties of his rate. He was unfit for sea duty and could not climb more than 1 to 2 ladders per hour. He could not walk more than a mile. He could not stand more than 15 minutes. He underwent physical therapy, treatment with medications and lost weight but none of this led to any relief and he was referred for a fitness evaluation. An Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) found him unfit with a rating of 10% for each leg. The CI requested reconsideration and this was done but no changes were made to the rating.

The CI had improvement of his exertional compartment syndrome after four-compartment releases. However after his surgery, he had a residual pain in his calves which was essentially incurable. The pain was most likely the result of division of the bridge between the gastroc and soleus musculature on the usual approach to the deep posterior compartment through a four compartment fasciotomy using two incisions. Because this division cannot be repaired, he had persistent residual pain. He had toughed it out in the service so far but had difficulty performing the duties of his rate. He was unfit for sea duty and could not climb more than 1 to 2 ladders per hour. He could not walk more than a mile. He could not stand more than 15 minutes.

The PEB notes and one outpatient visit documented mild muscle atrophy in the left lower extremity but the NARSUM measured each calf at 39 cm and there was no other evidence of any atrophy.


Ankle ROM DF (20) PF(45) EV IV Motor Sensory

ROM Mil

20030710 Left

10 30 10 10 5/5 Intact

Medial scar painful with deep

palpation

ROM Mil

20030710

Right

10 40 10 20 5/5

Medial scar painful with deep

palpation

ROM Mil

20030930 Left

3 25 5/5

ROM Mil

200300930

Right

5 25 5/5

ROM Mil

200301023

Left

10 30 5/5 Intact

Medial scar painful with deep

palpation

ROM Mil

200301023

Right

5 35 5/5

Medial scar painful with deep

Palpation

NARSUM 20050607 Left

50

passive

5 5 Pinprick intact except hyperesthesia over medial aspect of left ankle distal to incision (this is area of tibial nerve)

FROM

Significant tenderness in mid-calf at level of gastrocsoleus bridge bilaterally; no tenderness over wound area bilaterally

NARSUM 20050607 Right

50

passive

5 5

VA:

Using an evaluation completed two months before the time of separation from the Navy, the VA rated this disability as Residuals, Status Post Compartment Syndrome Release, Right and Left Calf at 10% each with a bilateral factor of 1.9 for a total of 20%.

Condition 2 Lower leg nerve damage/hyperesthesia

The CI repeatedly asked VA to apply a rating but they considered it non-service connected (NSC) on the initial rating and again in 2007. Navy exams showed a sensory deficit and hyperesthesia and the PEB included a peripheral nerve code. However, the PEB rated the muscle and nerve condition together using only one code, 5399-5312-8723.

If the sensory deficit (incomplete paralysis) was considered unfitting and affected an entirely different function form the muscle disability, it would be rated separately from the muscle injury code IAW VASRD §4.55(a). The notes from the PEB reconsideration document that the PEB members clearly thought he had a sensory deficit. It is not clear if the PEB opined the sensory deficit was unfitting but did not affect a function different from that affected by the muscle injury or that the sensory deficit was not unfitting.

Prior to his surgeries, the CI had chronically increased pressure in all four compartments: anterior, lateral, deep posterior and superficial posterior and could have sustained nerve damage to more than one nerve from this. He did complain of numbness all along. Many sensory exams were not documented in detail but merely stated sensation intact or the equivalent. If he had mild sensory deficits it could have been missed on those exams. Or it could be more of a paresthesia which would have a normal exam. A paresthesia was documented in the NARSUM in the area of the tibial nerve. On VA exam he had normal sensory exam but no details are documented, it merely says the sensory examination was normal. No Electromyogram (EMG) was done. The VA did not service connect nerve damage because their evaluation showed no evidence this condition existed.

While the sensory deficit and/or paresthesia is documented on multiple Navy exams, there is no evidence it interfered with his ability to perform the duties required of his rank or rating. There are no duty restrictions that can be attributed to this condition.

Condition 3: Pes Planus

No evidence this was unfitting. Multiple entries in service medical record, including enlistment physical document mild, asymptomatic pes planus. No duty restrictions or complaints related to flat feet were documented.

Condition 4: Scars

No evidence these were unfitting. The NARSUM specifically states scars were not tender to palpation. No duty restrictions or complaints related to the scars were documented. The VA assigned a noncompensable evaluation for the bilateral scars which were not considered disabling.

Other Conditions

Not in Disability Evaluation System (DES): Torn Anterior Cruciate Ligament, Right Knee; Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA); Residuals s/p Fracture 5th DIP, Right Hand; Hypertension; Benign Cyst, Right Kidney with History of Kidney Stones; Migraines

________________________________________________________________

BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. After careful consideration of all available information the Board unanimously determined that the CI’s condition be rated at a combined 20% with 10% for each leg rated at 10% under 5399-5312 and a bilateral factor of 1.9.

The bilateral lower leg pain the CI experienced after his surgeries is appropriately rated analogous to the corresponding muscle injury VASRD codes: 5312 Group XII. Function: Dorsiflexion (1); extension of toes (2); stabilization of arch (3). Anterior muscles of the leg: (1) Tibialis anterior; (2) extensor digitorum longus; (3) extensor hallucis longus; (4) peroneus tertius. The CI experienced a lowered threshold of fatigue and fatigue pain after his surgeries and these are cardinal signs and symptoms of muscle disability as described in sub-paragraph (c) of VASRD §4.56 Evaluation of muscle disabilities. His disability is considered moderate and a 10% rating is warranted. His disability does not meet the criteria for moderately severe disability of muscles as there is no indication on palpation of loss of deep fascia, muscle substance, or normal firm resistance of muscles.

VASRD §4.55(a) states that a muscle injury rating will not be combined with a peripheral nerve paralysis rating of the same body part, unless the injuries affect entirely different functions. A separate rating could be applied for hyperesthesia (if it was present and unfitting) if this condition did not affect the same function as the muscle injury. However, the Board unanimously determined that this condition was not unfitting and therefore no rating is applied.

The Board unanimously determined that neither Pes Planus nor Bilateral Lower Extremity Scars were unfitting.

The other diagnoses rated by the VA (Torn Anterior Cruciate Ligament, Right Knee; Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA); Residuals s/p Fracture 5th DIP, Right Hand; Hypertension; Benign Cyst, Right Kidney with History of Kidney Stones; and Migraines) were not mentioned in the Disability Evaluation System (DES) package and are therefore outside the scope of the Board. The CI retains the right to request his service Board of Correction for Naval Records (BCNR) to consider adding these conditions as unfitting.

________________________________________________________________

RECOMMENDATION: The Board therefore recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Residuals, Status Post Compartment Syndrome Release, Left Calf 5399-5312 10%
Residuals, Status Post Compartment Syndrome Release, Right Calf 5399-5312 10%
COMBINED (Incorporating BLF 1.9) 20%

_______________________________________________________________

The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20090202, w/atchs.

Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record.

Exhibit C. Department of Veterans' Affairs Treatment Record.

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

SECRETARY OF THE NAVY COUNCIL OF REVIEW BOARDS
720 KENNON STREET SE STE 309
WASHINGTON NAVY YARD DC 20374·5023

IN REPLY REFER TO

1850 CORB:003 26 April 2010

From: Director, Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards

To:

Subj: PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR)

Ref: (a) DoDI 6040.44

(b) PDBR ltr of 19 MAR 10

  1. Pursuant to reference (a), the PDBR reviewed your case and forwarded its recommendation (reference (b)) to the Department of the Navy for appropriate action.

  2. On 23 April 2010, the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Manpower & Reserve Affairs) took action in your case by accepting the recommendation of the PDBR that no change be made to the characterization of separation or disability rating assigned by the Department of the Navy's Physical Evaluation Board.

  3. The Secretary's decision represents final action in your case by the Department of the Navy and is not subject to appeal or further review by the Board for Correction of Naval Records.

Copy to: PDBR

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02208

    Original file (PD-2013-02208.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The NARSUM noted bilateral lower leg pain associated with exertion, and some tenderness in the right lower leg, absence of atrophy, weakness and tropic changes. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-00094

    Original file (PD-2013-00094.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No other conditions were identified by the MEB.The IPEB adjudicated “chronic or exertional compartmental syndrome in the bilateral lower legs status post (s/p)bilateral fasciotomies of the anterior and lateral compartments” as unfitting, with a combined rating of 20% (10% for each leg w/the bilateral factor) with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI appealed to the Formal PEB; however, he withdrew his appeal and was medically separated. The...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00731

    Original file (PD-2012-00731.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB forwarded exercise-induced compartment syndrome and decreased sensation and weakness lateral aspect right lower extremity (LE), status post (s/p) exercise syndrome release as medically unacceptable IAW AR 40-501 to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB). RECOMMENDATION: The Board therefore recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability rating and separation determination: UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING Left Lower Extremity Exercise-Induced Compartment...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-01015

    Original file (PD2012-01015.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated “History of compartment syndrome” as Category I (unfitting) with “left lower extremity pain” and “left superficial peroneal pain” deemed as related Category I diagnoses; combined disability was rated as 20%. History of Compartment Syndrome Condition. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: UNFITTING CONDITION History of Compartment Syndrome VASRD...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00656

    Original file (PD2012-00656.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    That MEB forwarded bilateral exertional compartment syndrome; left leg status post (s/p) anterior compartment release with recurrent anterior and lateral exertional compartment syndrome; bilateral leg pain and numbness secondary to the first two conditions; and left leg anterior compartment fascial defect s/p anterior compartment release to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E. Pre-Separation) – Effective Date...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01637

    Original file (PD2013 01637.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The bilateral leg condition, characterized as “bilateral leg pain” and “neuropraxia of branch of right superficial peroneal nerve” (both medically unacceptable) were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. A small (not infected) fluid collection was drained by aspiration,but pain with exercise and numbness persisted.On occupational therapy clinic visit on 29 October 2008, the CI reported constant bilateral leg pain but was able to “perform all usual tasks without...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01403

    Original file (PD2012 01403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB characterized his condition as “exercise-induced compartment syndrome”EICS and forwarded it to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.ThePEB adjudicated bilateral lower leg pain secondary to EICS as unfitting, rated 0%, citing the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appeals, and was medically separatedwiththat rating. The narrative summary (NARSUM) notes the CI had a lower leg pain that...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00103

    Original file (PD 2014 00103.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The bilateral exertional compartment syndromecondition was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated “bilateral exertional compartment syndrome, status post fasciotomies, leftleg”as unfitting rated 0%, with application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy.The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. The VA separately rated the left leg for residual surgical scars...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00131

    Original file (PD2010-00131.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the PEB rating which reflects the left saphenous nerve injury. Service Treatment Record. Subj: PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR) RECOMMENDATIONS

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00509

    Original file (PD2011-00509.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    An IPEB dated 7 April 2008 adjudicated “bilateral lower leg pain with CS as unfitting rated 21% (including bilateral factor) with application of the DoDI 1332.39 and VASRD. The left leg examination was normal and without pain. The Board determined therefore that none of the stated conditions were subject to service disability rating.