Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00076
Original file (FD-2015-00076.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

AIR FORCE DISCHARG E REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LA.ST, FIRST MIDDLE INJTIAL)     GRADE
(b) (6)
TYPE GEN        I        PERSONAL APPEARANCE      x        I        RECORD REVIEW
COUNSEL  NAM£ OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZAT ION      ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZA TION OF COUNSEL
YES      No
x
VOTE OFTHE BOARD
M EM BER SJTf lNG        HON      GEN      UOTHC    OTHER    DENY
(b) (6X*#

X*#

X*# X*#


ISSUES   A94.05   lNOtX NUMO.ER    A67.10   EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO TITE BOARD
1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4 BRrEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL"S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE
X*#

TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE llEARING

HEARING DATE     CASE NUMBER

16 Jun 2015      FD-2015-00076
APPLICANT'S ISSUE AND TilEBOAAD"S DECISIONAL RATIONALE ARE DISCUSSED ON 11£ ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE lt.6VIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE.

Case heard in Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an appl ication to the AFBCMR.

* RE
# NARRATIVE




(b) (6)


INDORSEMENT      DATE: 71812015
TO:      FROM:
SECRETARY OF Tilt AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR "ORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40     15.lS COMMAND OR. EE WING. JRD FLOOR
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742    ANDREWS AFB·,MD 10761-700 1


AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00         (EF-V2)  Previous



AIR FORCE DISCHARG E REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER


FD-2015-00076

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable, a change to the reason and authority for the discharge and to change the reenlistment code.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge, change of reason and authority for discharge, and change of reenlistment code.

ISSUE: The applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct -Minor Disciplinary Infractions

The Air Force Discharge Review Board, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an applicant's discharge, is authorized to change the characterization of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption , to include evidence submitted by the applicant. The Board completed a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge and the discharge process to ensure the discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The applicant's record of service included two Article 15's and three Letters of Reprimands. His misconduct included reporting late for duty (2x), being absent from place of duty (2x), failure to go to scheduled dental appointment, and reporting late to roll call.

The applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his discharge . The applicant does submit that he has matured since being discharged and deserves a second chance. The Board opined that through the administrative actions taken, the applicant had ample opportunities to change his negative behavior. They found the seriousness of the willful misconduct offset any positive aspects of the applicant's duty performance. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or inequity
to warrant an upgrade of the discharge. A discharge is upgraded only if the applicant and the Board can establish that an inequity or impropriety took place at the time of discharge. After a thorough review of the record, the Board found no evidence to justify an upgrade of the discharge characterization, reason for the discharge or the reenlistment code.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation , was within the discretion of the discharge authority, and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00218

    Original file (FD-2015-00218.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicantappeals forupgradeofdischargeto Honorable. Theapplicantwasoffereda personalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequests thatthereviewbecompletedbased ontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthe discharge.ISSUE: The applicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforMisconduct-Drug Abuse

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00226

    Original file (FD-2015-00226.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappeals forupgradeofdischargeto Honorable. Theapplicantwasoffereda personalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompleted basedontheavailable servicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthe dischargeISSUE:The applicant receivedaGeneral dischargeforMisconduct-MinorDisciplinaryInfractions

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00203

    Original file (FD-2015-00203.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00644

    Original file (FD-2014-00644.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicant appealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoard deniestheupgradeofthedischarge ISSUE:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00081

    Original file (FD-2015-00081.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:Theapplicantappeals forupgradeofdischarge toHonorable. Theapplicantwasoffereda personalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbased ontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbrief containsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicant andthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00665

    Original file (FD-2014-00665.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorableandtochangethereasonandauthorityforthedischarge. TheapplicantappearedandtestifiedbeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB),withoutcounsel,at AndrewsAFBonMarch12,2015 Thefollowingadditionalexhibitswere submittedatthe hearing: Exhibit#5:Applicant'sadditionalmedicaldocumentsTheattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00068

    Original file (FD-2015-00068.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable.The applicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequests thatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.The attachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge ISSUE:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00343

    Original file (FD-2010-00343.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    FINDING: The requests to upgrade the discharge, to change of reason and authority for discharge, and to change of reenlistment code are denied. Attachment: Examiner's Brief CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2010-00343 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable and to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. FINDING: The requests to upgrade the discharge, to change of reason and...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00073

    Original file (FD-2015-00073.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasoffereda personalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequests thatthereviewbecompleted based ontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge. ISSUE: TheapplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforMisconduct-ConductPrejudicial...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2012-00648

    Original file (FD-2012-00648.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCE DISCHARGEREVIEWBOARD HEARINGRECORDi"AMt OF SERVICtMEMBER(LAST,FIRST MIDDLEINITIAL) GRADE(b)(6)TYPE GEN I PERSONALAPPEARANCE x I RECORD REVIEW COUNSEL NAMEOFCOUNSELANOORORCANIZ.\TION ADDRESSANO ORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSEL YES No x .... .... .... MEMBERSITTING l!ON OEN UOTl lC OTlIER DENY (b)(6) x - ISSUES A94.53 INDEX NUM B&R A67. 10 EXHIBITSSUBMlTTEDTOTH'.E BOARD 1 ORDERAPPOINTINGTHE BOARDAPPLICATIONFORREVIEWOF DISCHARGELEHEROFNOTIFICATIONBRIEFOFPERSONNELFILE COUNSEL'SRELEASETO...