Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00073
Original file (FD-2015-00073.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REV I EW BOARD H EARING RECORD
XAM E OF ERVICE .\IE:\IBER (LAST.FIRST MIDDLE IN ITIAL)   GRAD£
{b)(6)
TYPE GE  I        PERSONAL APPEARANCE     x        I        RECORD REVIEW
COIJNSIL         NAME Of COl/NSEL ASD OR ORCAN17..ATION   ADDRESS AND OR ORCANlZATION Ot'COUNSEL
YES      No
x
VOTE OFTHE BOARD
MEMBER SITTING   HON      GEN      UOTl lC  OTHER    DENY
{
b)(6)    x
x x
x x
ISSUES   A94.53   INDEX NUM8£1t     A67.90   EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TOTHE BOARD
ORDER APPOINTIN G THE BOARD
APPLICATI ON FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
LEITER OF NOTrFI CATION
BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASETO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBIT SUBMITIED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARAN CE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING

li EARINC OATE   CASE 1''1JMUER

16 Ju n 2015     FD-2015-00073
APPLIC"'"T' SISSUE"' DntE BOAJU»S DECISIONAL RATIONALEAJIE DISCUSSED ONntEATTACHEl)AJR FOltCE DISCHARGE 1t1!V1EW BOAIID DECISIONAL RATIONALE.

Case heard in Washington , D.C.

Advise appl icant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an appl ication to the AFBCMR.








{b){6)


INOORSEMENT      DATE: 7,.,,..015
TO:      FROM:
SAF/MRBR         SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCt:PEltSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
550 C STREET WEST,SUITE 40       15J5 C0MMA1'D OR,££ WINC.3RO l'LOOR
RANDOLPH AFB.TX 78150-4742       A.'iOREWS AFB, MD 207'17001


Af HQ FORM 0-2077, JA.t"00       {EF-V2)   Previous



AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBE R

FD-2015-00073

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record .

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.

ISSUE: The applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct - Conduct Prejudicial to Good Order and Discipline

The Air Force Discharge Review Board, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an applicant's discharge, is authorized to change the characterization of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption , to include evidence submitted by the applicant. The Board completed a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge and the discharge process to ensure the discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The applicant's record of service included two Article 15's, one Vacation of Non-jud icial Punishment, one Letter of Reprimand, one Letter of Admonishment , and two Records of Counseling. His misconduct included; without authority leaving appointed place of duty (2x), failure to shave after being told one day prior, failure to report a bird strike in engine, failure to report on time (2x), and backing a bobtail truck into another vehicle.

The applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his discharge. The applicant does submit that he was young and reckless at the time of discharge and believes he deserves a second chance.
The Board opined that through the administrative actions taken, the applicant had ample opportunities to change his negative behavior. They found the seriousness of the willful misconduct offset any positive aspects of the applicant's duty performance . The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or inequity to warrant an upgrade of the discharge.

The applicant also cited his desire to receive the G.I. Bill benefits asjustification for upgrade. The DRB noted that when the applicant applied for these benefits, he signed a statement (DD Form 2366, on July 1, 2004) that he understood he must receive an Honorable discharge to receive future educational entitlements. The Board was sympathetic to the impact from the loss of these benefits to the applicant; however, this is not a matter of inequity or impropriety which would warrant an upgrade .

A discharge is upgraded only if the applicant and the Board can establish that an inequity or impropriety took place at the time of discharge. After a thorough review of the record, the Board found no evidence to justify an upgrade of the discharge characterization.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation, was within the discretion of the discharge authority, and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged .
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00137

    Original file (FD-2015-00137.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasoffered apersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB)but declined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoard deniestheupgradeofthedischarge. ISSUE: TheapplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforMisconduct-MinorDisciplinaryInfractionsTheAirForceDischargeReviewBoard,under...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00681

    Original file (FD-2013-00681.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGE REVIEWBOARDHEARING RECORDNA\1EOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLE INITIAL)GRADE AFSNISSANX RECORD REVIEWl-COllNSEl --1NJ\1EOf COUNSEL J\'OORORGAi'il7..AHOXYES No xMEMBERSITTINGADDRESS MW ORORGMill'.J\TIONOfCOUNSELVOTE OFTHE BOARD HON GEN UOTI-IC OTHER A67.90 EXHIBITSSUBMITTEDTOTH.EBOARD IORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOF DISCHARGE3 LErfEROFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEF OFPERSONNEL FILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETO THEBOARDADDITIONALEXH1131TSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONAL APPEARANCETAPE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00095

    Original file (FD-2015-00095.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable.Theapplicant wasoffered apersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischargeISSUE: Theapplicantreceived...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00076

    Original file (FD-2015-00076.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappeals for upgrade ofdischarge toHonorable,achange to the reason andauthorityforthedischargeandtochangethereenlistmentcode.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearance before theDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontains availablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2012-00648

    Original file (FD-2012-00648.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCE DISCHARGEREVIEWBOARD HEARINGRECORDi"AMt OF SERVICtMEMBER(LAST,FIRST MIDDLEINITIAL) GRADE(b)(6)TYPE GEN I PERSONALAPPEARANCE x I RECORD REVIEW COUNSEL NAMEOFCOUNSELANOORORCANIZ.\TION ADDRESSANO ORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSEL YES No x .... .... .... MEMBERSITTING l!ON OEN UOTl lC OTlIER DENY (b)(6) x - ISSUES A94.53 INDEX NUM B&R A67. 10 EXHIBITSSUBMlTTEDTOTH'.E BOARD 1 ORDERAPPOINTINGTHE BOARDAPPLICATIONFORREVIEWOF DISCHARGELEHEROFNOTIFICATIONBRIEFOFPERSONNELFILE COUNSEL'SRELEASETO...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00115

    Original file (FD-2015-00115.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GE ERAL: The applicantappealsforupgradeof dischargeto Honorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthe reviewbecompletedbasedonthe availableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefconta insavailable pertinentdata ontheapplicant andthefactorsleading to the discharge.FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeof thedischarge.ISSUE: TheapplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforMisconduct-ConductPrejudicialtoGoodOrderThe AirForceDischargeReview...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00048

    Original file (FD-2015-00048.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargeto Honorable.Theapplicantwasoffered apersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedon theavailableservicerecord.Theattached...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00499

    Original file (FD-2014-00499.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischarge toHonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge. ISSUE:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00068

    Original file (FD-2015-00068.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable.The applicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequests thatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.The attachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge ISSUE:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00730

    Original file (FD-2014-00730.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicantappealsfor upgradeof dischargeandto changethereasonandauthorityfor the discharge. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequests that thereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattached briefcontains availablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.