Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00203
Original file (FD-2015-00203.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

AIR FORCE DISCHARG E REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST.FlRSf MIDDLE I ITIAL)       GRADE
(b) (6)

TYPE GEN        I        PERSONAL APPEARANCE     x        I        RECORD REVIEW
COUNSENAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION      ADORt:SSAND OR ORGANIZATION OPCO NSEL
YES      No
x
VOTE OF THE BOARD
MEMBER SITTING  HON      GEN      UOTHC    OTHER    DENY
(b) (6)  x
x x
x x
ISSUES   A94.53   INDEX NUMBER     A67.30   EXHIBITS SUllMIITED TO THE BOARD
1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
BRLEF OF PERSONNEL FLLE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXJ-ILBITS SUBMITTED AT Tli\1E OF PERSON AL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARJNG

HEARING DATE     CASE NUMBER

13 Jul 2015      FD-2015-00203
APPLICANT'SISSUE AND 1liEBOARD"S DECISIONAi. RATIONALE ARE DISCUSSED ON 11IE AITACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE

Case heard in Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/withou t counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.








(b) (6)


INDORSEMENT      DATE: 8/512015
TO:      FROM:
StCRETl\RY        THE Al R FORCE PERSONNEL CO!L CIL
AJK Jo ORC£ OISCHAl<Gt: ttt:Ylt:W BOARD
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40      153S COMMAND OR, EE WING,JRO LOOR
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742      A,l)RJ:;WSAFB, MOW76! 7001


AFHQ FORJ'\1 0-2077, JAN 00       (EF-V2Previous



AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER

FD-2015-00203

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.

ISSUE: The applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct -Commission of a Serious Offense

The Air Force Discharge Review Board, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an applicant's discharge, is authorized to change the characterization of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the applicant. The Board completed a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge and the discharge process to ensure the discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The applicant's record of service included a Special Court Martial charge I, failure to obey an order from the commander by wrongfully being within 500 feet of his wife and child; charge II, signing an official statement in which the statement was false. He also had misconduct that included failure to go to duty on time; willfully leaving a firearm and ammunition in his POV while parked in his duty section; reporting late for duty; unlawfully striking his wife with his hands; withdrawing unauthorized cash from GTC (2x); and being apprehended by security forces for domestic disturbance at his residence on base.

The applicant cited his desire to receive the G.I. Bill benefits asjustification for upgrade. The DRB noted that when the applicant applied for these benefits, he signed a statement (DD Form 2366, on October 16, 2006) that he understood he must receive an Honorable discharge to receive future educational entitlements. The Board was sympathetic to the impact from the loss of these benefits to the applicant; however, this is not a matter of inequity or impropriety which would warrant an upgrade.

A discharge is upgraded only if the applicant and the Board can establish that an inequity or impropriety took place at the time of discharge. After a thorough review of the record, the Board found no evidence to justify an upgrade of the discharge characterization.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation , was within the discretion of the discharge authority, and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00203

    Original file (FD2008-00203.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) PERSONAL APPEARANCE NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION TYPE GEN AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD GRADE SRA AFSN/SSAN x RECORD REVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY X X Xx X X ISSUES A94.05 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 ee A I ae 1_|ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2_|APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3_|LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00129

    Original file (FD-2015-00129.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappeals for upgradeofdischargetoHonorable,achange tothe narrativereasonandachangetothereenlistment code. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompleted based ontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00235

    Original file (FD-2015-00235.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischarge toHonorable. Theapplicantwasoffereda personalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbased ontheavailableservicerecord.Theattached briefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactors leadingtothedischarge. FINDING:TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge.ISSUE:The applicantreceiveda GeneraldischargeforMisconduct-DrugAbuse

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00312

    Original file (FD-2015-00312.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischarge to Honorable. Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearance beforetheDischarge ReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.The attachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge.ISSUE: TheapplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforMisconduct-UnsatisfactoryPerformance

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00263

    Original file (FD-2015-00263.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable. FINDING: TheBoard deniestheupgrade ofthedischarge. ISSUE: TheapplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforMisconduct-MinorDisciplinary InfractionsTheAirForceDischargeReviewBoard,underitsresponsibilitytoexaminetheproprietyandequityofanapplicant'sdischarge,isauthorizedtochangethecharacterizationofserviceandthereasonfordischargeifsuchchangeiswarranted.Inreviewingdischarges,theBoardpresumesregularityintheconductof...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00203

    Original file (FD-2014-00203.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicantappeals forupgradeofdischarge tohonorable TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequests thatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00086

    Original file (FD-2009-00086.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SSS ° - VOTE OF THE BOARD Te MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTUER DENY x x x x x ISSUES A94.53 INDEX NUMBER A67.30 oS | EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD foe 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL. The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00025

    Original file (FD-2009-00025.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge. Applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his/her discharge. The DRB took note of the applicant's duty performance as documented by his performance reports, letters of recommendation and other accomplishments.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00008

    Original file (FD-2015-00008.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasoffereda personalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompleted based ontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicant andthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING:TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthe discharge.ISSUE:TheapplicantreceivedaGeneraldischarge forMisconductThe...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00481

    Original file (FD-2014-00481.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable. Theapplicant wasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbe completedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. The attachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.