Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00755
Original file (FD-2014-00755.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAM£0f SERV ICE i\1£i\IU£R (L \ST, FIRS'IMIDOLI:: INITIAL)
(b) (6)
GRA0£
TYPE GEN I     PERSONAL APPEARAl"iCE I        RECORD REVIEW
COUNSEL ,\ME or COL'NSEL,\NO OR ORCAN17.ATION ADDRESS AND OR ORCANl7 \ TION OF COU 'SEL
YES No
x

MEMBER SITTING
\'OH:Of.'THI!: BOA llO
It ON GEN UOTllC ont ER DENY
(b) (6) x
x
x
x
x
ISSllt A94.53 IND[). lt UH:R A67.30 EXIIIBITS SUBMITTEDTO THE BOARO
1 ORDER APPOINTING Tll E BOARD
2 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO TlIE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXII!BITS SUBMITTED AT Tll\1E OF PERSONAL APPEARANCF
TAPE RECORDll\'G OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE IIEARING

l l f:ARl .l\C l),\TE

07 Apr 20 JS
{ A$t-:. llMHER

FU-2014-00755
APPLICANTS ISSl'E AND me llOARD'S DECISIO'IAL RATIONALE ARF DISCllSSED ONTllE A fTA('llf'D AIR FOR.CE OISCHAAGE EVIEW BOARD Df<'ISIO'IAL RATIONALE.
Case heard in Washi ngton, D.C.

Advise appl icant of the decision of the Board , the right IO a personal appearance with/without counsel, and t he righ1 to submi t an application to the AFBCMR.









AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00         (EF-V2)  Previous



AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE L':'llBER

FD-2014-00755

GENERAL : The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to l lonorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING : The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.

ISSUE: The applicant received a General discharge for Miscond uct - Commission of a Serious Offense (Civilian conviction)

The Air Force Discharge Review Board, under its responsibil ity to examine the propriety and equity of an applicant 's discharge, is authorized to change the characteri zation of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption , to include evidence submitted by the applicant. The Board completed a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge and the discharge process to ensure the discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The applicant"s record of service included three Letters of Reprimand. and one Letter of Counseling. His misconduct included failure to comply with dormitory duties (3x), falsifying a dormitory duty log sheet and being arrested for criminal property damage to 16 victi ms' properties with a BB-gun.

The applicant cited his desire to receive the G.I. Bill benefits as justification for upgrade. The ORB noted that when the appl icant applied for these benefits, he signed a statement (DD Form 2366, on February 20, 2008) that he understood he must receive an Honorable discharge to receive future educational entitlements. The Board was sympathetic to the impact from the loss of these benefits to the applicant; however, this is not a matter of ineq uity or impropriety which would warrant an upgrade.

A discharge is upgraded only if the applicant and the Board can establish that an inequity or impropriety took place at the time of discharge. After a thorough review of the record , the Board found no evidence to justify an upgrade of the discharge characterization.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation, was within the discretion of the discharge authority, and that the applicant was provided full administrati ve due process.

In view of the foregoing findings. the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.


Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00432

    Original file (FD-2014-00432.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theappl icant appealsforupgradeofdischargeto Honorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard (ORB)butdecl inedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedonthe available service record.Theattachedbrief contains availablepertinentdataontheappl icant andthefactorsleadingto the discharge. FINDING: The Board deniestheupgradeofthedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00044

    Original file (FD-2014-00044.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEW BOARD HEARINGRECORDNA MEOFSERVICEl\ IEMBER (LAST,FIRSTMlDOLEI NITIA L)GHA 0£A FSNISSANPERSONAL APPEARANCE COUNSEL NAM£OfCOUNSt:lANOORORGANIZt\l'ION 1--- ----lYf.S Ntx x RECORDREVIEW ,\l)OllESS,\M) ORORCMill..ATIONOfCOUS£LVOTEOFTHEROARDMEMBER SITTINGllON GEN UOTI IC' OTHER DENY :AtllNC01\-Tt 18 Sep2014 FD-2014-00044 A66.00 EXlllBITSsu a.vi1 rn:DTOTll£BOARI) IORDER l\Pl'OINTINGTllEC30ARD2 Al'l'LIC/\!'IONFOi{RlVltWOFUISCll/\RGI. :3 LEIIERUl'NUl'JFICAI ION4 URll.

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD 2014 00044

    Original file (FD 2014 00044.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEW BOARD HEARINGRECORDNA MEOFSERVICEl\ IEMBER (LAST,FIRSTMlDOLEI NITIA L)GHA 0£A FSNISSANPERSONAL APPEARANCE COUNSEL NAM£OfCOUNSt:lANOORORGANIZt\l'ION 1--- ----lYf.S Ntx x RECORDREVIEW ,\l)OllESS,\M) ORORCMill..ATIONOfCOUS£LVOTEOFTHEROARDMEMBER SITTINGllON GEN UOTI IC' OTHER DENY :AtllNC01\-Tt 18 Sep2014 FD-2014-00044 A66.00 EXlllBITSsu a.vi1 rn:DTOTll£BOARI) IORDER l\Pl'OINTINGTllEC30ARD2 Al'l'LIC/\!'IONFOi{RlVltWOFUISCll/\RGI. :3 LEIIERUl'NUl'JFICAI ION4 URll.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00750

    Original file (FD-2014-00750.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforanupgradeofdischargetoHonorableandachangeofreasontothenarrative.The applicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl ined andrequeststhatthe reviewbe completedbasedonthe available servicerecord.Theattachedbrief contains availablepertinent data ontheappl icant and thefactors lead ing tothe discharge. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge and change of reason and autho1ity for discharge. ISSUE:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00581

    Original file (FD-2014-00581.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GE ERAL: Theapplicantappealsfor upgradeof discharge toIlonorablc.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclinedandrequests thatthe reviewbecompletedbasedonthe avai Iableservice record.Theattachedbriercontai nsavailable pertinentdata onthe applicantandthefactors lead ingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniesthe upgradeofthe discharge. ISSUE: The applicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforM iscondu<.

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00105

    Original file (FD-2014-00105.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforanupgradeofdischarge, changetothenarrative reason, andtochangethereenlistmentcode. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl inedandrequeststhatthe reviewbe completedbasedonthe availableservicerecord. The attachedbriefcontains availablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleading tothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00634

    Original file (FD-2014-00634.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable, to change the reason andauthorityforthedischargeandtochangethereenlistmentcode.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclinedandrequeststhat thereviewbecompletedbasedon theavailableservicerecord.The attachedbriefcontainsava ilablepertinentdataonthe applicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00548

    Original file (FD-2014-00548.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARD HEARINGRECORDNAME or SERV ICEMEMBER(LAST, flRSTl\11DOLE IN ITIA L)PERSONAL APPEARANCE\'F.S NoxGRADE AfSN/SSAN x RECORD REVIEW ,\l)DRF.SSANO OR ORGANIZATIONOfCOUNSEL VOTEOFTHE BOARDMEMBERSITTING HON GEN UOTHC' OT11£R OF.NY A67.90 liXlllBITSSUBMITTED TO THEBOARO I ORDERAPPOINTINGTH[:BOARD2 A l'l'Ll(';\TIONFOi{1uv 1t:W 01·OISC'llARGI'.3 Ll:TllROFNO1IFll'AIION4 BRIEFOFl'tRSONNtLFILECOUNSEL'SRl. :LEASE10 IHt80ARI)ADDITIONALEXIllBITSSUBMl'ITEDATT...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00687

    Original file (FD-2014-00687.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsfor upgradeofdischargetoHonorable. Theapplicant wasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhat thereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. The attachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdata onthe applicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00155

    Original file (FD-2014-00155.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeof dischargeto Honorableandchangeofauthorityfordischarge,andchange ofreenlistmentcode. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservice record. The attachedbriefcontains availablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorslead ing tothedischarge.