Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00425
Original file (FD-2014-00425.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

AI R FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD H EARING RECORD
NAME OF SERV ICE 1\l Ei\IBEH (LAST, FIRST l\ll OOLE: IN ITIAL)      GRADE    AFSN/SSAN
(b)(6)
TYPE GEN        I        PERSONAL APPEARANCE     x        I        RECORD REVIEW
COUNSt:L         NAM E m·COl'l"SEL ANO OR ORCAN17 1TI O    ADDRESS ANO OR ORCINIMTION Of COLll"SEt
YES      No
x
VOTE OF THE BOAIW
MEM BER SITTING  HON      GEN      UO'l llC         0'11 ll:iR       DENY
(b)(6)   x
x x x
x


1:,st·t ;)

A94.53

l Ot;X N'L" IBt:R

A67.10

EX llllll'rS SUBM l'l1'£1) TO Tll E BOARD
I ORDI-R APPOIN'l I NG THE BOAR!)
APPLICATION FOR RE\'IFW OF DISCllARGE
LE !"I l R OF NO'l IFICA I ION
4 BRIFr 01 PERSONNEL FI LE
COllNSH'S RFl.FASE TO Tll F BOARD
ADDI J IONA I EX I llBI I S SUBM I I ff D ATTltvl E OF
PLRSON/\L 1\Pl'h\l\ANCI
I Al'I· RH Of(f)IN(1 01 l'ERSON 1\I 1\l'l'E/\Ri\NCI 111:.i\RINO


ltt;IRl'G DHE    ( AM i'l\l'\ IU l-:1<

11 Feb 20 15     FD·201.t-00.t25
APPi I('ANTS ISllllA'\DTtlf BOARD'S DtCISIO'IAI RATIONALB ARE DISC'IJSSEO 01'1 Tl IE ATTA('ltED AIR FORC'E DIS<'llARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATION I\Lt

Case heard i n Wash ington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to subm it an applica t ion to the AFBCM R.









(b)(6)

INDORSEMENT      OATE: 3/2.l/2015
fRO\I:
S1\F·MRBR  ·c.u·I \ R\ o. nu:\ IR l"OR('I- PfRSONI I .( Ol lNCIL
\ IR FOR(£ 01$(11IRGE REl'I (\\ BOARI)
''0 (' <n RFFT \\'FSl, Sllll 1 4lf...lF C O\l\l.ANI> t>t.U;\\ C.JRD 1-'1,0(Hl
R1\NDOl.Pll AFB. TX 7lll50-17<l  1:-00Rl:\\S,1FB. Mil 11761-7001


AFIJQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00        (EF-V2)  Previous



AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER

FD-2014-00425

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.

ISSUE: The applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct -Minor Disciplinary Infractions

The Air Force Discharge Review Board, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant's discharge, is authorized to change the characterization of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the applicant. The Board completed a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge and the discharge process to ensure the discharge met the perti nent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant's record of service included one Article 15, three Letters of Reprimand , one Letter of Counseli ng and two Records of Counseling. Applicant's misconduct included failing to go to duty on time on divers occasions; making false official statement (2x's) to an officer and NCO with intent to deceive; failure to go to training, failure to go to duty and failure to notify leadership; failure to go to duty and failure to notify supervisor and failure to report to physical traini ng the next morning and committing adultery.

The applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his discharge. The applicant cited his desire to receive the G.I. Bill benefits as justification for upgrade. The DRB noted that when the applicant applied for these benefits, he signed a statement (DD Form 2366, on November 15, 2000) that he understood he must receive an Honorable discharge to receive future educational entitlements. The Board was sympathetic to the impact from the loss of these benefits to the applicant; however, this is not a matter
of inequity or impropriety which would warrant an upgrade.

A discharge is upgraded only if the applicant and the Board can establish that an inequity or impropriety took place at the time of discharge. After a thorough review of the record, the Board found no evidence to justify an upgrade of the discharge characterization, reason for the discharge or the reenlistment code.

CONCLUS ION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substanti ve requirements of the discharge regulation , was within the discretion of the discharge authority, and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00634

    Original file (FD-2014-00634.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable, to change the reason andauthorityforthedischargeandtochangethereenlistmentcode.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclinedandrequeststhat thereviewbecompletedbasedon theavailableservicerecord.The attachedbriefcontainsava ilablepertinentdataonthe applicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD 2014 00214

    Original file (FD 2014 00214.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetohonorable TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailable pertinentdataonthe applicantandthe factorslead ingtothe discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00214

    Original file (FD-2014-00214.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetohonorable TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailable pertinentdataonthe applicantandthe factorslead ingtothe discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00155

    Original file (FD-2014-00155.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeof dischargeto Honorableandchangeofauthorityfordischarge,andchange ofreenlistmentcode. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservice record. The attachedbriefcontains availablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorslead ing tothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00432

    Original file (FD-2014-00432.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theappl icant appealsforupgradeofdischargeto Honorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard (ORB)butdecl inedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedonthe available service record.Theattachedbrief contains availablepertinentdataontheappl icant andthefactorsleadingto the discharge. FINDING: The Board deniestheupgradeofthedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00071

    Original file (FD-2014-00071.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDH EARINGRECORDNAME:OFSE:RVICEMEMBE:R (LAST,FIRSTMIDDLE INITIA L)CR/\0£ A FSNISSANRECORDREVIEWCUUNSt:L1-- ---.- ---1NAIEOFCOUNSELANOORORGAN17*\ TIONAODRt:SSANOORORGANl7AT IONOFCOUNSELt-\_ES--+- No----1(b) ( 6) x A42.00GEN UOTllC' OTHERE:XlllBITSSUBMITI'EJ)TO TllEBOARD llf.ARINC 01\TE 16 Oct2014 FD-2014-00071 ORDERAPPOINTINOTiii'BOARD2 Al'PLICArlONFORRl VltWOF DISC!I ARGE3 LEITEROFNOiIFICJ\lION4 llRltFOFPERSONNEL Fill;COUNSEL"SRloLEt\SE IU·1...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD 2014 00071

    Original file (FD 2014 00071.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDH EARINGRECORDNAME:OFSE:RVICEMEMBE:R (LAST,FIRSTMIDDLE INITIA L)CR/\0£ A FSNISSANRECORDREVIEW CUUNSt:L NA IEOFCOUNSELANOORORGAN 17*\ TION AODRt:SSANOORORGANl7ATION OFCOUNSEL 1-- ---.- ---1\ESx (b) (6) (b) (6) MEMBERSITTING HON GEN UOTllC' OTHERE:XlllBITSSUBMITI'EJ)TO TllEBOARD llf.ARINC 01\TE 16 Oct2014 FD-2014-00071 ORDERAPPOINTINOTiii'BOARD2 Al'PLICArlONFORRl VltWOF DISC!I ARGE3 LEITEROFNOiIFICJ\lION4 llRltFOFPERSONNEL Fill;COUNSEL"SRloLEt\SE IU·1...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00758

    Original file (FD-2014-00758.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARD IIEARJ NGRECORD'IA;\lEOFSERVICE'lt:'•lllEn (L,\ST,tlllSr;\llDDLE INITlr\L) (;Jt,\Ot: ,\fN/SSAN(b) (6) (b) (6) TYPE GEN I l'ER!SO 'ALAPPEARANCE x I Rt..COROHEVlt..W C:O SU. '\\IIore()\"f I "I)ORORC "I/TIO\ IODRr\\ "DORORG "l/\110\Ot(01 "rt HS '• x\ \IE\IBERSITTI G llON GFN LO11K' OTllER DEN\ (b)(6) x i-xi-i- ISSlI'S A94.05 l\Of\ '-1\IOtR A67.10 t.XlllKII s SIJn"nTt:O TOTll £BOARD I ORDl R Al'POIN rINGI Ill·BOARD \PPI I('A110\JIORRI \IIW OF DISC'llARGE l11I fR 01...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00752

    Original file (FD-2014-00752.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetoHonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthe reviewbecompletedbasedon the availableservice record.The attachedbtiefcontainsavailable pertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothe discharge. FINDING: TheBoarddenies the upgradeof the discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD 2014 00391

    Original file (FD 2014 00391.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsfor upgradeofdischargetohonorable. TheapplicantappearedandtestifiedbeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB),withoutcounsel, viavideoteleconferencebetweenAndrewsAFBMarylandandTravisAFB,CAonSeptember22.2014. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdata onthe applicantandthe factorsleadingtothe discharge.