Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00304
Original file (FD-2014-00304.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAME Of SERVICE .\IEMRER (LAST, FIRST MIODLEINITl \L)      C.RAl)F.         AFSN SSAN
(b)(6)   (b)(6)
TYPE GEN        I        PERSONAL APPEARANCE      x        I        RECORD REVIEW
COUNStL  NAME OF COUNSEi.. ANO OR ORGA. I ZATION  ,\OORESS;INO OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
YES      No
x
VOTE OF THE BOARD
M EMBER SITTINllON     GF.N     l JOTl!C         OTI IF.R         DENY
(b)(6)   x
x x x
x
1ss11r.s         A94.53   lOE\'. Nl'\IR f A67. JF:XlllBITS SUBMITTF:D TO TllE BOARD
J ORDER APPOINTING 1 llE BOARD
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCllAl\GE
LETTER Of NOTIFICATION
BRIEF Of PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE '10 TllE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF Pl'RSONA I AP l'FARAN!'F
TAPE RIXORDING OF PERSONALAPPEARANCE IIEARING

11t- M l C OATt.:        CASE NIIMBER

04 Feb 20 15     FD-20 14-00304
APPLICANT 'S ISSI IE A.ND THE 1)0,\Rl)'S DECISIONAL RAl10NAI£ARE OIS\l!SSEO ON Tllf AIfA('HFO AIR FORCF, OISCllARGF Rf,VIEW BOARD DECISIONAi.RATIO\ Al E

Case heard in Washington, D.C.

Advise appl icant of the decision of the Board, the right to a persona l appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.








(b)(6)


INDORStcM£NT      DATE: 2/!0/20 15
ro:      f'f<Q,\I:
SAF/MRBR         SECRt:TARY OFTllE A I R !"ORCE PtRSON'IEI.('Ol'NC'll.
AIK FOKCE OI SCllARvt:Kt:\ I[\\ 11(.JAKI>
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40      15.15 cmtMANO DR, EE \\'ING.JRO FLOOR
Rr'\NDOLPll AFB, TX 781 50-4742   ANDREWS MB. MO 20762-1001


AFHQ FORM 0-2077..JAN 00         (EF-V2)  Previous







CASE NUMBER

FD-2014-00304

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.

The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.


ISSUE: The applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct -Minor Disciplinary Infractions

The Air Force Discharge Review Board, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant 's discharge, is authorized to change the characterization of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption , to include evidence submitted by the applicant. The Board completed a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge and the discharge process to ensure the discharge met the perti nent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant 's record of service included two Article l Ss and one Letter of Admonishment for failing to report to two appointments . His misconduct which resulted in Article l 5s included controlling a private vehicle while drunk, and disrespect in language toward a first lieutenant.

The applicant contends that when he separated, his separation order ind icated that he received an honorable discharge. The applicant's characterization was correctly reflected on his DD Form 214 as a general, but was not correct on his AF IMT 100. The Board noted the issue was result of administrative error at the time of discharge, and therefore did not negate his commander 's recommendation for his proposed discharge. A discharge is upgraded only if the applicant and the Board can establish that an inequity or impropriety took place at the time of discharge. After a thorough review of the record, the Board found no evidence to justify an upgrade of the discharge characterization.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation , was within the discretion of the discharge authority, and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.



Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00594

    Original file (FD-2014-00594.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsfor upgradeofdischargetoHonorable. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge A discharge isupgradedonly ifthe applicantandtheBoardcanestablishthatan inequityorimproprietytookplaceatthe time of discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00456

    Original file (FD-2014-00456.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsfor upgradeofdischargetohonorable. TheapplicantappearedandtestifiedbeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB),withcounsel,viavideoteleconferencebetweenAndrewsAFBMaryland andTravisAFB, CAonSeptember25,2014. The attachedbriefcontains availablepertinent data onthe applicantandthefactorsleading tothe discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2012-00117

    Original file (FD-2012-00117.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequests thatthereviewbecompletedbased ontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailable pertinentdataontheapplicant andthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING:TheBoarddeniestheupgrade...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00634

    Original file (FD-2014-00634.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable, to change the reason andauthorityforthedischargeandtochangethereenlistmentcode.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclinedandrequeststhat thereviewbecompletedbasedon theavailableservicerecord.The attachedbriefcontainsava ilablepertinentdataonthe applicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00785

    Original file (FD-2014-00785.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedonthe availableservice record.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataon theapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING: The Boarddeniestheupgradeofthe discharge.ISSUE: TheapplicantreceivedaGenerald ischargefor Misconduct-MinorDisciplina ryInfractionsThe AirForceDischargeReview...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00409

    Original file (FD-2014-00409.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GEN ERAL: The applicant appealsforupgradeof dischargetoHonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl inedandrequeststhatthe reviewbe completedbasedonthe availableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdata onthe applicantandthe factorslead ing tothedischarge.FIN DING:TheBoard -denies theupgradeof the discharge.ISSUE:Theapplicantreceived aGeneral dischargeforMisconduct-M inor Discipl inaryInfractions

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00639

    Original file (FD-2014-00639.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforadischargeupgradetoHonorable. Theapplicantwasoffered apersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthe reviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailable pertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00494

    Original file (FD-2014-00494.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthe reviewbecompletedbasedon the availableservicerecord. The attached brief containsavailablepertinentdataonthe applicantandthefactorsleading tothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00705

    Original file (FD-2014-00705.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicant appealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasoffered apersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge. ISSUE: TheapplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargefor Misconduct-BasedonCommissionof aSerious...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2013-00392

    Original file (FD-2013-00392.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappeals forupgrade ofdischargetoHonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailable pertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.