Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00705
Original file (FD-2014-00705.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

AJ R FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEAR.ING RECORD
"llA \IF. OF SF:R\'ICE .\1£:\IBER (LAST,FIRST \llOOl.E l'llTIAL)
(b) (6)
GRADE
TYJ>E GE ! PERSONAL APPEARANCE x    I        RECORD REVIEW
COllNSfl.. NAME or COl':-OSCl AD OR ORC \17.ATIO AUOKl!>S -"'D OR ORGA:0.11.A llU:O. 0 lUl !>ll..
YES No
x

MEMBER SITTING
VOTE OF THE BOARD
HON GI: l'OTllC OTHER        DENY
(b) (6) x
x
x
x
x
I ,.,,
A94.53
IXOf \ -.:F\tRf; R:  A67.30 EXHIBITS SUB\11TTED TO ntE BOARD
1 ORDER APPOINl 11'.G 'I I IE BO'\RO
2 APPLICATION FOR RCVllW 01 OIS(llARGE
3 LETTER Of '<OTIFICATIO'I
4 ORIEf Of PERSONNCI rll I
COUNSEL'S RELEASC TO 1111, BOARD
ADDITIONAL CX lll011 S SUOMl"n'EO AT TIME OF PFRSONAL APPFARANCF
TAPE RECORD ING OF PERSONAi. APPEARANCE HF.ARING
llE\Rl C OATE

01 Apr 2015
CASE'W\'lBER

FD-2014-00705
APPi IC'A'' T' 14' \:F A DTHEllOARD'S DECL IO'<Al RATIO".U f A.RE DISOJSSID THE A1TACHFO AIR FOllCF05CHARGFREVIEWBOARD DECISIO' Al R!ITKNAl.E.
Case heard in Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/withou1 counsel. and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.








(b) (6)


INOORSEM.ENT     DATE: 412712015
TO:
SAF/MRBR
550 C' STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANOOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742
YR0 1:
SECRETARY OFTllE AIR FORCt:P:R<. ONEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE OISC.llAR(,;l. RI;.\ It\\ KOAKO
ISJS COl\t.\XODR. EE \\INC. 3RD •LOOR
,\ 0R[\\SAFB, ID 076l 7001
Drawn Shape (ignored-not implemented yet) Drawn Shape (ignored-not implemented yet) A FHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00         (F.F-V2)



AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER

FD-2014-00705

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.

ISSUE: The applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct - Based on Commission of a Serious Offense

The Air Force Discharge Review Board, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant's discharge, is authorized to change the characterization of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption , to include evidence submitted by the applicant. The Board completed a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge and the discharge process to ensure the discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The applicant's record of service included one Letter of Reprimand for breaking into several locked tractor-trailors and illegally removing several pieces of equipment with intent to steal and then fleeing the scene once officers arrived.

The applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his discharge. The applicant does submit that his discharge was based on one isolated incident and he would like to clean up his past. The Board opined that the misconduct was a significant departure from conduct expected of all military
members. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or inequity to warrant an upgrade of the discharge. A discharge is upgraded only if the applicant and the Board can establish that an inequity or impropriety took place at the time of discharge. After a thorough review of the record, the
Board found no evidence to justify an upgrade of the discharge characterization.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation, was within the discretion of the discharge authority, and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and detem1ines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00328_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00328_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable,tochangethereasonandauthorityforthedischarge,andtochangethereenlistmentcode.Theapplicant appearedandtestifiedbeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB),without counsel,atAndrews AFBon01Aug2013. Thefollowingadditionalexhibitsweresubmittedatthehearing:Exhibit#5:Applicant'sContentionsTheattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00178_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00178_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappeals forupgradeofdischargetohonorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailable servicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00532_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00532_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADEX RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOF · COUNSEL.,..........----:- ------ - --- --·...,.........._.."! G HON GEN UOTIIC1ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETTER OFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARING Drawn Shape (ignored-not implemented yet) Drawn Shape...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00139

    Original file (FD-2014-00139.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappeals forupgradeofdischargetohonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbased ontheavailable servicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicant andthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00511

    Original file (FD-2014-00511.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealstochangethereasonandauthorityforthedischarge Applicantwasoffereda personalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedand requests thatthereviewbecompleted based ontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontains availablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00288_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00288_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICE MEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADEAFSNISSAN x PERSONALAPPEARANCENAMEOFCOUNSELANDORORGANIZATIONRECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSELMEMBERSITTING • i l I ' iGEN UOTHCOTHER DENY Drawn Shape (ignored-not implemented yet) \ l I ! I l X+* Drawn Shape (ignored-not implemented yet) I I l l t ' Drawn Shape (ignored-not implemented yet) I ! I ' II \ 1 \ I l IX+*X+* !'

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00637

    Original file (FD-2013-00637.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDBEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVJCEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSANFOIAException(b)(6) TYPEHON I PERSONALAPPEARANCE x I RECORD REVIEW NAM £ OFCOUNSELANDORORCANIZATION ADDRESSANDORORCANl7\TIONOPCOUNSELVI'S Nox ' VOTEOFTHEBO MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY Drawn Shape (ignored-not implemented yet) FOIAException(b)(6) X+ ,_ ISSUES A94.05 INDEXNUMBEK A28.10 •},; l:: 1ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2APPUCATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETIEROFNOTIFICATION...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00533_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00533_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADEAFSNISSANX RECORD REVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANll.ATIONOFCOUNSEL Drawn Shape (ignored-not implemented yet) Drawn Shape (ignored-not implemented yet) Drawn Shape (ignored-not implemented yet) Drawn Shape (ignored-not implemented...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00591_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00591_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Drawn Shape (ignored-not implemented yet) AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDGRADE AFSN/SSANX RECORDREVIEADDRESSANDORORGA.NIZATIONOFCOUNSEL Drawn Shape (ignored-not implemented yet) Drawn Shape (ignored-not implemented yet) Drawn Shape (ignored-not implemented...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00014

    Original file (FD-2014-00014.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADE AFSNISSANX RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOIJNS&LxMEMBERSITTINGVOllON GEN UOTHC DENYx Drawn Shape (ignored-not implemented yet) ISSUES A94.SS INDEXNUIBER A67.9-0=-- -r fthUllDDrnrrssiiii/Mliiii"ifi:'.il!ii:iitiliiilf'.'"" Additionallyhestatesthathebelieveshedeservesasecondchancedespitehisdiscrepanciessothathemayserve hiscountryintheUnitesStatesAirForce.