Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2012 | FD-2012-00029_13
Original file (FD-2012-00029_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

AlR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

NAME OFSERVICE MEMBER (LAST,FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)
GRADE    AFSN/SSAN


TYPE GEN        x

PERSONAL APPEARANCE

RECORD REVIEW

NAME OF COUNSEL AND Olt ORGANIZATION
AJ)DRESS AND OR ORCANIZATION Of CO       EL




MEMBER SITTING

HON      GEN      UOTHC

OTHER    DENY

X*+ X*+ X*+
X*+





ISSUES


A92.21 A92.01



INDEX NUM BER


A67.10




ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE
X*+



.· ·•.

TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING

HEA.RJNC DATE    CASE NUMBER

16 Jul 2013

FD-2012-00029


Case heard in Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR. Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request.
*Narrative Reason and Authority
+RE Code








TO:

SAffMRBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742

SECRETARY OFll!EAIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE OISOIARCE REVIEW BOARD
15JSCOMMAND DR. EE WINC,JRD FLOOR ANDREWS Af11,MD 20762 7001


AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00         (EF-V2)  Previous



AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER

FD-2012-00029

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of the discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code.

The applicant appeared and testified before the Discharge Review Board (DRB), without counsel, at Andrews AFB on 16 Jul 2013.

The following additional exhibits were submitted at the hearing: Exhibit #5: Applicant's Contentions

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The request for the upgrade of the discharge, to change the reason and authority for discharge, and to change the reenlistment code are denied.

ISSUE: Applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct - Minor Disciplinary Infractions

Applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his discharge. However, he does believe that his discharge did not take into account the good things he did while in service. The record indicates the applicant received two Article 15s. His misconduct included driving under the influence, failed to renew liability insurance, with intent to deceive made a false statement to an airman and a civilian, and driving while intoxicated. During the course of the hearing the applicant took full responsibility for his actions, and the Board commends the applicant for his honesty. However, the Board found that the willful misconduct offset any positive aspects of the applicant's duty performance. The Board concluded the discharge was appropriate for the reasons which were the basis for this case.

The DRB was pleased to see that the applicant was doing well, attending school and volunteering in his community. However, no inequity or impropriety in his discharge was suggested or found in the course of the hearing. The Board concluded the misconduct of the applicant appropriately characterized his term of service.

The applicant cited his desire to receive the G.I. Bill benefits as justification for upgrade. The DRB noted that when the applicant applied for these benefits, he signed a statement (DD Form 2366, on
September 21, 2007) that he understood he must receive an Honorable discharge to receive future educational entitlements. The Board was sympathetic to the impact the loss of these benefits was having on the applicant, but this is not a matter of inequity or impropriety which would warrant an upgrade.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation, was within the discretion of the discharge authority, and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00029

    Original file (FD-2014-00029.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedon theavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataon theapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeof thedischarge. ISSUE: Theapplicantreceiveda...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00029

    Original file (FD-2009-00029.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge. Based upon the seriousness of the applicant’s offenses, the Board found that his two years of service did not outweigh the offenses he committed.

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00356

    Original file (FD-2010-00356.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    | j | # A92.21 ~ i i710 See a oe A92.01 1 JORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 \BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 12 Jul 2012 FD-2010-00356 - Pea eISS ‘Case heard in Washington, D.C. FINDING: The request for the upgrade of the discharge, to change of reason and authority for...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00268_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00268_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:Theapplicantappeals forupgradeofdischargetohonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearance beforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedon theavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbrief containsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING:TheBoarddeniestheupgrade ofthe discharge.ISSUE: ApplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforMisconduct-MinorDisciplinary...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00409_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00409_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearance beforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbrief containsavailablepertinent dataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge. ISSUE: ApplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforAPatternofMisconduct-ConductPrejudicial toGood...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00220

    Original file (FD-2013-00220.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    lORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARDAPPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE LETTER OFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEForPERSONNELFILE COUNSEL'SRELEASETO THEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOF PERSONALAPPEARANCE TAPERECORDINGOF PERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARING DATE CASENU!\:IBER12May2014 FD-2013-00220CaseheardinWashington,D.C.Adviseapplicantofthedecisionof theBoardandthe righttosubmitanapplicationtotheAFBCMR. TO•SAF/MRBR550CSTREET WEST,SUITE40 RANDOLPHAFB,TX78150-4742 SECRETARYOF THEAIRFORCEPERSONNELCOUNCIL...

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00029

    Original file (FD2004-00029.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. Attachment: Examiner's Brief I FD2004 -00029 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH SRA) MISSING DISCHARGE DOCUMENTS 1. (Change Discharge to...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00320

    Original file (FD-2013-00320.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    1 ORDER APPOINTINGTHEBOARD2APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEF OF PERSONNELFILE COUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHE BOARD ADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOF PERSONAL APPEARANCETAPERECORDING OFPERSONAL APPEARANCEHEARINGHEARING DATE CASENUMBER 28Jan2014 FD-2013-00320Caseheardviavideo-teleconferencebetweenJointBaseAndrewsMarylandandRobinsAFBGeorgia Adviseapplicantof thedecisionof theBoardandtherighttosubmitanapplicationtotheAFBCMR. Namesandvoteswillbemadeavailabletotheapplicantat...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00625_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00625_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY x•+ x•+x•+x•+A67.JO1ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2APPLICATION FORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4BRJEFOF PERSONNEL FILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHE BOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCE HEARINGHEARINGDATI! *NarrativeReason andAuthority+RECodeTO:SAF/MRBR 550 CSTREETWFST,SUITE40RANDOLPHAFB,TX 781504742SECA£TARV or THEAIRFORCEPERSONNELCOUNCIL AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARD ICOMMANDDR,££ WING, 3RD...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00405_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00405_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable,tochangethereasonand authorityforthedischarge, andtochangethereenlistmentcode.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbrief containsavailablepertinent dataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: The requestforthe upgradeofthe discharge,to change the reasonandauthorityfor discharge,...