Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2009-00418
Original file (FD-2009-00418.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

 

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN

 

TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW

q NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY
X*+
|
X*+
X*+
X*+
ISSUES A94.53 INDEX NUMBER A67.90 i os t ee Ts
1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 {APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4 {BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING
HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER
08 May 2012 FD-2009-00418

 

 

   
 
    

Case heard in Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an
application to the AFBCMR.

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request.

*Narrative Reason and Authority
+ RE Code

 

   

TO: FROM:

SAF/MRBR SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD

550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR

RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001

 

 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous
CASE NUMBER

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | pp 5999-00418

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and
authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined
and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The request for the upgrade of the discharge, to change the reason and authority for discharge,
and to change the reenlistment code are denied.

ISSUE: Applicant received a General discharge for a Pattern of Misconduct — Conduct Prejudicial to Good
Order and Discipline

Applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his discharge. The applicant does
submit that he would like a second chance so that he may serve his country in the Unites States military
again. The record indicates the applicant received two Article 15s, one Vacation, and two Records of
Individual Counseling. His misconduct included damaged military property (2x), drunk and disorderly
conduct, failed to go to physical training and absent without leave. The Board recognized the fact that the
applicant had served nine years of service before his discharge was initiated, but concluded the applicant’s
misconduct outweighed the positive aspects of his time in the Air Force. Additionally, the Board noted the
applicant was entitled to a hearing before an administrative discharge board, but waived his right. The
Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or inequity to warrant an upgrade of
the discharge.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00418

    Original file (FD-2014-00418.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:Theapplicantappeals forupgradeofdischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearance beforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedon theavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataonthe applicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthe discharge.ISSUE: TheapplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforMisconductTheAirForceDischargeReviewBoard,under...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00463

    Original file (FD-2008-00463.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    / NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL “ NOTHOPTHEBOARD) = HON GEN UOTHC OTHER x¥+ Met xA+ e+ Xt ISSUES A95.00 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 a EXTUBIT SSUBMITTED tO "TE (RD me A93.11 1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD _ A01.00 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00597

    Original file (FD-2008-00597.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    [LETTER OF NOTIFICATION ee 4 [BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 19 Feb 2010 FD-2008-00597 SSSUE AND a cae Case heard i in Washington, D.C, FORGE PGES. The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. FINDING:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00064

    Original file (FD-2009-00064.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of discharge. Applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his discharge...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00120

    Original file (FD-2009-00120.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. FINDINGS: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge. The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00152

    Original file (FD-2009-00152.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    2 | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO TILE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 14 Jul 2010 FD-2009-00152 ‘ABELICANT'S ISSUE AND THE BOARDS DECISIONAL: RATIONALE ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED ATR FORCE DING ree ee SS ae Biel nos LARGE BEVIEW-BOARG DECISION! The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00148

    Original file (FD-2009-00148.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIEW OT ROURGEL ”] Name oF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION 7 ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL so VOTR OF TTE BOARD... ee An Se Ce esc oa cos HON GEN UOTHC OTHER x* 4- X*+ Ket Xt ISSUES 1S SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD, Saha cic ante ORDER APPOINTING THI BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00121

    Original file (FD-2009-00121.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. FINDING: Upgrade of the discharge, change of reason and authority for discharge and change of reenlistment code are denied. The Board highly recommends that if the applicant can provide additional documented information to substantiate his issue, he should consider exercising his right to make a personal...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00530

    Original file (FD-2008-00530.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL VOTEOR-TIEE- BOARD HON GEN UOTHC / OTHER DENY x Xx x Xx L _| x | Issues SaaS NUMER rr = : “ED TO THE ISSUES A94.53 INDEX NUM A67.00 EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THI BOARD 1 JORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00097

    Original file (FD-2009-00097.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN SRA a TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW Ree NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ~ ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL ESET VOTE OF THE BOARD. a