AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)
AFSN/SSAN
TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIEW
OT ROURGEL ”] Name oF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION 7 ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
so VOTR OF TTE BOARD...
ee
An Se Ce esc oa cos
HON GEN UOTHC OTHER
x* 4-
X*+
Ket
Xt
ISSUES
1S SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD,
Saha cic ante
ORDER APPOINTING THI BOARD
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING
A94,53 INDEX NUMBER A67.1 0
foe lta | bo [ee
HEARING DATE CASK NUMBER
22 Jul 2010 FD-2009-00148
| UB AN DECISIONAL RATION ALE) DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED AIR FORGE DISCHAROE REVIEW BOARD. D!
oo ee eee : casio
ibaa tig EN DOSE
BCISIONAL RATIONALE. foo scr i
Sua
Case heard in Washington, D.C.
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an
application to the AFBCMR.
Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request.
*Reason and Authority
+Reenlistment Code
K
ELAN IT
TO: FROM;
TAT SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
SAF/MRBR og _ AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
§50 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous
CASE NUMBER
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE. ]- ¥D-2009-00148 ©”
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and
authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined
and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.
‘The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
After a review of the record, the Board unanimously voted to grant the relief of the requested upgrade as
discussed below.
FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge, change of reason and authority for discharge,
and change of reenlistment code.
The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and
after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of
discharge.
ISSUE:
Applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his discharge. The applicant does
submit that he believes he deserves a second chance despite his discrepancies so that he may serve his
country in the Unites States Air Force again. The record indicates the applicant received an Article 15 and
three Letters of Reprimand for misconduct. His misconduct consisted of underage drinking, threatening to
rape a fellow airman, committing adultery, failure to go, and harboring an underage minor in his dormitory
room. The Board opined that through these administrative actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to
change his behavior. ‘They found the seriousness of the willful misconduct offset any positive aspects of the
applicant's duty performance. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety
or Inequity to warrant an upgrade of the discharge.
CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00148
TO: I SAFMRBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 I FROM: SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 I (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER m)-2005-00148 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00039
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL AFSN/SSAN ae MEMBER SITTING UOTHC OTHER DENY x x x x x aa — re a ; “SURMELTED GO ISSUES A95.00 INDEX NUMBER A49.00 ao as SUBMITTED £0. Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit...
AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00616_13
GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable,tochangethereasonandauthorityforthedischarge,andtochangethereenlistmentcode.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING: Upgrade of the discharge, change of reason and authority for discharge, and change...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00120
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. FINDINGS: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge. The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of discharge.
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00031
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN | PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW ue NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL OE OTE OF THE BOARD HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY xX x x si ice x x cre - ere ma ‘ TS SUBSITE TO THE BOARE ISSUES A95.00 INDEX NUMBER AG7.10 Se EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE B ARD A01.00 1 [ORDER APPOINTING THEBOARD |2_|APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE __ 3...
AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00072
GENERAL: Theapplicantappeals forupgradeofdischargetoHonorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompleted basedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbrief containsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicant andthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING:TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthe discharge.ISSUE:The applicant receivedaGeneral discharge forMisconduct -Minor DisciplinaryInfractionsTheAirForceDischargeReviewBoard,underits...
AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00299
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN AMN TYPE | PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW .| NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY xX x x xX xX 7 — issuES 94,53 INDEXNOMBER 464.00 2 BOIS SUBMEETED A93.01 [1 | ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD |2_|APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00348
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge. Applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his discharge.
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00580
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge. The DRB concluded that the characterization of the applicant’s discharge was appropriate due to the misconduct.
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00406
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW NE) NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY xX XA X*+ X*+ X*+ ISSUES A92.21 “INDEX NUMBER A67.10 no A93.01 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 {APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE...