AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN
TYPE GEN
PERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIE
OREGUNSEL: nn a
NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
GARD
ie
MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY
X
x
x
x
x
F a REE ee Sei os SI BN s TOcar AL
ISSUES A94.53 INDEX NUMBER A67.90 a ‘EXHIB S.SUBMITTED 70 THE.BOA
1_|ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD _ _
2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISC! IARGE ee.
3. [LETTER OF NOTIFICATION _ a
4 [BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE _
COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING
HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER - , ,
14 Jul 2010
ABS
Case heard in Washington, D.C.
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an
application ta the AFBCMR.
Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request.
eve
TQ: FROM:
: SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
ne /MRBR nen et tree: AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW HOARD
§50 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, FE WING, 3RD FLOOR
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001
(EF-V2) Previous
CASE NUMBER
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2009-00120
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined
and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.
The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and
after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of
discharge.
ISSUES:
Applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his discharge. The applicant does
submit his desire to have his discharge upgraded so that he may be eligible for Veteran benefits. The record
indicates the applicant received two Article 15s and a Vacation for consuming alcohol while underage.
The Board opined that through these administrative actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to change
his behavior. They found the seriousness of the willful misconduct offset any positive aspects of the
applicant's duty performance. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety
or inequity to warrant an upgrade of the discharge.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and the applicant provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00597
[LETTER OF NOTIFICATION ee 4 [BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 19 Feb 2010 FD-2008-00597 SSSUE AND a cae Case heard i in Washington, D.C, FORGE PGES. The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. FINDING:...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00463
/ NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL “ NOTHOPTHEBOARD) = HON GEN UOTHC OTHER x¥+ Met xA+ e+ Xt ISSUES A95.00 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 a EXTUBIT SSUBMITTED tO "TE (RD me A93.11 1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD _ A01.00 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00530
OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL VOTEOR-TIEE- BOARD HON GEN UOTHC / OTHER DENY x Xx x Xx L _| x | Issues SaaS NUMER rr = : “ED TO THE ISSUES A94.53 INDEX NUM A67.00 EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THI BOARD 1 JORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00152
2 | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO TILE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 14 Jul 2010 FD-2009-00152 ‘ABELICANT'S ISSUE AND THE BOARDS DECISIONAL: RATIONALE ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED ATR FORCE DING ree ee SS ae Biel nos LARGE BEVIEW-BOARG DECISION! The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00064
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of discharge. Applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his discharge...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00148
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIEW OT ROURGEL ”] Name oF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION 7 ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL so VOTR OF TTE BOARD... ee An Se Ce esc oa cos HON GEN UOTHC OTHER x* 4- X*+ Ket Xt ISSUES 1S SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD, Saha cic ante ORDER APPOINTING THI BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL...
AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2009-00418
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW q NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY X*+ | X*+ X*+ X*+ ISSUES A94.53 INDEX NUMBER A67.90 i os t ee Ts 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 {APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 {BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00097
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN SRA a TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW Ree NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ~ ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL ESET VOTE OF THE BOARD. a
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00134
FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge. The record indicates the applicant received two Article 15s, three Letters of Reprimand, two Letters of Counseling and three Records of Individual Counseling. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or inequity to warrant an upgrade of the discharge.
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00121
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. FINDING: Upgrade of the discharge, change of reason and authority for discharge and change of reenlistment code are denied. The Board highly recommends that if the applicant can provide additional documented information to substantiate his issue, he should consider exercising his right to make a personal...