NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)
TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
AFSN/SSAN
|] NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION
MEMBER SITTING
_“WOTE QR THE BOARD ag |
GEN UOTHC OTHER
ISSUES
INDEX NUMBER
A95.00
A01.00
A66.00
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
1
2
3
4
BRIEF GF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL. APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING
HEARING DATE
13 May 2010
«APPLICANTS 15505 AND HOARD 6
CASE NUMBER
FD-2009-00122
Case heard in Washington, D.C.
application to the AFBCMR.
iT
AEN MPAA? RT ey:
tine
TO:
SAF/MRBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742
|
goo
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an
Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request.
SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL, COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR
ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
(EF-V2)
Previous
CASE NUMBER
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2009-00122
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined
and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors Jeading to the discharge.
FINDING: ‘The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.
The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and
after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of
discharge.
ISSUE:
Issue |. Applicant submitted no issues and requested that the review be completed based on the available
service record. The record indicated that the applicant was discharged for Misconduct—Drug Abuse. He
received an Article 15 dated 25 April 2005 for wrongfully using marijuana. The applicant also had a Record
of Individual Counseling on 3 different occasions; twice for failure to go to appointed place of duty and for
driving infraction on Luke AFB. The Board concluded the misconduct was significant departure from
conduct expected of all military members. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant
was found to be appropriate.
CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00090
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) ABSN/SSAN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW b : NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING GEN | UoTHC | OTHER | DENY x ISSUES A01.00 INDEX NUMBER A67,30 a ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION oo" EAMBITS SUBMITTED T 1 2 3 4 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00403
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN “| o_/ TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX | RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL YES No X MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC | OTHER DENY i x | ; xX xX x 4 ISSUES A94.53 INDEX NUMBER A66.00 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00032
The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of discharge. Applicant submitted no issues and requested that the review be completed based on the available service record. The record indicates that the applicant was discharged for Misconduct—Drug Abuse.
AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2009-00537
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge. Applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his discharge.
AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2009-00756
SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC | OTHER DENY x = x x x ISSUES A94, 1 1 INDEX NUMBER A67.90 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE | |TAPE...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00010
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) TYPE GEN. | PERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIEW AFSN/SSAN 3] NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL QRTHE BOARD” GEN UOTHC | OTHER DENY _ MEMBER SITTING Son A66.00 ISSUES A93.17 INDEX NUMBER A92.35 Lt eee 2. The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00064
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of discharge. Applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his discharge...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00097
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN SRA a TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW Ree NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ~ ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL ESET VOTE OF THE BOARD. a
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00029
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge. Based upon the seriousness of the applicant’s offenses, the Board found that his two years of service did not outweigh the offenses he committed.
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00303
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX. Because member’ discharge file was unavailable to the Board for review, the Board was unable to conclusively ascertain the nature of misconduct on member’s part that formed the basis for the discharge. The DRB concluded that the characterization of the applicant’s discharge was appropriate due to the misconduct.