Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00198
Original file (FD2008-00198.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)

 

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

GRADE AFSN/SSAN

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

| PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW
: .| NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
Rev Louis Christian Base Counseling 00
VOTE OF THE BOARD. a
MEMBER SITTING HON GEN | UOTHC OTHER DENY
|
Xx
{

xX

x

X

x

 

 

 

 

ISSUES INDEX NUMBER
A94,54

A67.10
A66.00

_ EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD.
[a ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE

 

 

LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE

b/w lire

 

COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD

 

ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE

 

TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING

 

HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER

 

25 Jun 2009 FD-2008-00198

   

Case heard in Washington, D.C.

application to the AFBCMR.

 

SAF/MRBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742

 

INDORSEMENT

FROM:

 

 

APPLICANT'S ISSUE AND THE BOARD'S DECISIONAL RATIONALE ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED:AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request.

   

  

‘DATE: 7/8/2009

SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD

1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR

ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001

 

 

 

 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00

(EF-V2)

Previous
CASE NUMBER
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2008-00198

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason for
discharge and to change the reenlistment code.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise this right.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge, change of reason for discharge and change the reenlistment code.

The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an
inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.

ISSUE:

Applicant submitted that he is ready to move on and put his past behind him. The record indicates the
applicant received three Records of Individual Counseling, a Letter of Reprimand and two Article 15s witha
Vacation action. The misconduct included failing to complete leave authorization form, violation of dress
and appearance, reporting late for duty, failure to follow directions, failure to pay debt (two occasions) and
wrongful use of marijuana. The Board opined that through these administrative actions, the applicant had
ample opportunities to change his behavior. They found the seriousness of the willful misconduct offset any

positive aspects of the applicant's duty performance. The Board concluded the discharge was proper and
equitable.

The applicant states he would like his discharge upgraded to utilize G.I. Bill benefits. The Board noted that
when the applicant applied for these benefits, he signed a statement understanding that he must receive an
Honorable discharge to receive any future educational entitlements. The Board was sympathetic to the
impact the loss of these benefits was having on the applicant, but this is not a matter of inequity or
impropriety which would warrant an upgrade.

CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge characterization should not be changed.

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00530

    Original file (FD-2008-00530.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL VOTEOR-TIEE- BOARD HON GEN UOTHC / OTHER DENY x Xx x Xx L _| x | Issues SaaS NUMER rr = : “ED TO THE ISSUES A94.53 INDEX NUM A67.00 EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THI BOARD 1 JORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00596

    Original file (FD-2008-00596.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge. Applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his discharge. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or inequity to warrant an upgrade of the discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00234

    Original file (FD2008-00234.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN | PERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY x x xX x xX ISSUES A94,53 INDEX NUMBER A49.00 s 1 [ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS...

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00155

    Original file (FD2008-00155.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN Pl AB a TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW COUNSEL NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL ‘VOTE OF THE BOARD MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC | OTHER DENY x x x xX xX _ EXHIBITS SUBMITTED:TO THE BOARD ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00240

    Original file (FD2008-00240.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 29 Jun 2009 FD-2008-00240 Case heard in Washington, D.C. application to the AFBCMR. FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied. The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity or...

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00281

    Original file (FD2008-00281.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied. The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge. The applicant cited his desire to receive the G.I.

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00166

    Original file (FD2008-00166.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN FY SRA pe PERSONAL APPEARANCE 4 RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL VOTE OF THE BOARD MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC | OTHER DENY x xX x x xX EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO: THE BOARD ISSUES A94.53 INDEX NUMBER A67.30 EXHIBI I 'O: THE BOARD J |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00133

    Original file (FD-2009-00133.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW >) COUNSEL °.."''| NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL HON GEN “UO” THC OTHER X Xx x x x ISSUES A94 00 UNG A UVEEE A67 10 d ae a EXHIBITS SUBMITT ED TO THE THE BOARD ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00064

    Original file (FD-2009-00064.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of discharge. Applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his discharge...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00544

    Original file (FD-2008-00544.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN AMN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW COUNSEL NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL "VOTE OF THE BOARD HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY xX x x x x ISSUES A95.00 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD A01.00 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL...