1 NAME OF SERV1C:E I\IER.IBER (IASI", FIRST MIDDLE INITIA12)
1 . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ,
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE RKVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
1 GRAI)E
AMN
( AFSNISSAN
-------------------
C.-.-......-.-.-...
'OUNSEI*
NAMh OF COUNSEL AND OH ORGANIZATION
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
X
RECORD REVIEW
ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATlOhl O F COllNShL
YES
No
X
I
I
MEMBER SITTING
I
VOTE OF TIIF, BOARD
, A - --
I I
-
......................................
ISSUES
A93.01
I INDEXNClMAFR
A67.10
HEARING OATE
1 22 Feb 2007
CASE NUMBBH
1 FD-2006-00252
I
:XtlXBITS SUBMTI'TED TO THE BOARD
I
I
ORDI'R AI'I'OMTMG TI IF. BOARD
AI'PI.ICATION I'OK REVIEW 01' DISCHARGE
LETTI'K OF NOTIFICAI'ION
HRIEF OF PBKSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THC BOARD
ADDI'I'IONAL EXHIBI'I'S SUBMITTEL) AT TIME 01'
PERSONAL APPEAKANCE
TAPE RI'C:ORDING OF PERSONAL APPI'ARANCE HE
1
2
3
I 4
I
1
.-
-
1
Advise applicant of thc decision of thc Board, ihe right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an
application to the AFBCMR.
1 Na~nes and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request.
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFH. 'I X 781 50-4742
SECREI'AHY OF TllE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCII.
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
1535 COMMAND DR. EE WING. 3RD FLOOR
ANI)HF.WS AFB, ~ ~ ' 2 0 1 6 2 - 7 1 t O 2
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
(EF-V2)
Previous edition will be used
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NllMBER
FD-ZU06-00252
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.
The applicailt was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise this right.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the dischargc.
FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied.
The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and
after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of
discharge.
ISSUES:
Issue 1 . Applicant conteilds discharge was inequitable because it was too harsh. The records indicated the
applicant received two Article 15s and two Letters of Reprimand for misconduct. The misconduct included
failure to go, making verbal threats to another airman, conspiracy to commit an assault and battery, and
unlawfully striking another airman. The DRB opined that through these administrative actions, the applicant
had ample opportunities to change his negativc behavior. The Board concluded the misconduct was a
significant departure from conduct expected of all military members. The characteri~ation of the dischargc
received by the applicant was found to be appropriate.
Issue 2. Applicant coiltends that he should not be penalized indefinitely for a mistake he made when young.
The DRB recognized the applicant was 20 years of age when the discharge took place. However. there is no
evidence he was immature or did not know right from wrong. The Board opined the applicant was older
than the vast majority of first-term members who properly adhere to the Air Force's standards of conduct.
The DRB concluded that the characterization of the applicant's discharge was appropriate due to the
misconduct.
Issue 3. The applicant stated he was told his discharge would automatically be upgraded in six months. The
DKB noted the issue was common, the result of miscommunication. A discharge is upgraded only if the
applicant and the DRB can establish an inequity or impropriety took place at the time of discharge. In this
case, none was found. so the Board denied the appeal.
CONCLUSIONS: Thc Discharge Revicw Board coilcludcs that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive rcquireinents of the discharge rcgulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of dischargc, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
(Former AMN) (HGH A1C)
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr USAF Tinker AFB, OK on 25 Mar
97 UP AFI 36-3208, para 5.49 (Misconduct - Minor Disciplinary Infractions).
Appeals for Honorable Discharge.
2. BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 11 Apr 76. Enlmt Age: 18 7/12. Disch Age: 20 11/12. Educ: HS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A. A-86, E-71, G-55, M-78. PAFSC: XlA531 - Aircrew Airborne Computer
Systems Apprentice. DAS: 9 Feb 96.
b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 19 Nov 94 - 14 Mar 95 (3 months 26 days) (Inactive).
3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Enlisted as AB 15 Mar 95 for 6 yrs. Svd: 02 Yrs 00 Mo 11 Das, all AMS.
b. Grade Status: A m - 24 Oct 96 (Vacation of Article 15, 6 Mar 97)
A1C - 29 Apr 95
c. Time Lost: None.
d. Art 15's: (1) 06 Mar 97, Vacation, Tinker AFB, OK - Article 117.
.--------------------
You. did. on or about 1 Dec 96. wronqfullv communicate
to SrA 1 ....................
: a threat to kick his ass and cap him
in the knee. Article 86. You, did, on or about 26 Feb
97, without authority, absent yourself from your place
of duty at which you were to be, to wit: building 282
room 126, located at Tinker AFB, OK, and did remain so
absent until on or about 28 Feb 97. Reduction to A m .
(No appeal) (No mitigation)
d
(2) 24 Oct 96, Tinker AFB, OK - Article 81. You, did, on
or about 24 Sep 96 conspire with SrA 1 ......................
..-..-..-.-..-..-....-.
if A- L -------------------------:
and
,.-..-....-..-..-.-..~..~...
if A m :
i - - - - - - - - - - -
I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
i
..........................
:to commit an offense under the Uniform
.....................................
L.-....-..-..-.-..------
Code of Military Justice, to wit: assault consummated by
a battery and in order to effect the object of th-c---------
conspiracy you, SrA :
.------
-----
' Amn 1 .-..-..-....-..-..-.---.
i and:
: ~ - ~ ~ - ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ - ' ~
invite A m ; .-....-..-..-.-..-----------:
to room 105, building 5903
...-..-..-.-..-
where he was in fact assaulted. Article 128. You, did,
.-------------
on or about 24 Sep 96 unlawfully strike A m 1 ------------- 1
-------------.
Suspended reduction to Airman. Forfeiture of $228.00
pay and 14 days extra duty. (No appeal) (No mitigation)
:in the face and arms with your closed fist.
-.-.-..-..-....-..-----------
a-nn L - - - - - - - - - - - :
: did
........................
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ! I
L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I
.
e. Additional: LOR, 27 FEB 97 - Failure to go.
LOR, 27 JAN 97 - Making verbal threats via telephone.
f. CM: None.
g. Record of SV: 15 Mar 95 - 15 Oct 96 Tinker AFB 2 (HAF Dir)REF
h. Awards & Decs: AFTR, NDSM, AFOUA.
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (02) Yrs (04) Mos (07) Das
TAMS: (02) Yrs (00) Mos (11) Das
4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 26 Jan 06.
(Change Discharge to Honorable)
Issue 1: It has been 8 years, I was told after 6 months could be move to
honorable, I have grown as a man, I am a Father & Husband now and would like
to be able tell my children I was Honrably (sic) released.
ATCH
None.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
552d OPERA'I'IONS GROUP (ACC)
TINKER AIR FORCE BASE, OKLAHOMA
l
-
20 March 1997
MEMORANDUM FOR AI c I-.~.-.
...............................................
: 965 AACS
-. -. . . . -. - -. . . -. . . . -. - ,. . . -. -. . . . -. -. . . .
FROM: 965 AACSICC
Tinker APB OK 73 145
SUBJECT: Notification Memorandum
1. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for Misconduct. The
authority for this action is AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.49, Minor Disciplinary
Infractions. If my recommendation is approved, your service will be characterized as honorable
or general, I am recommending that your service be characterized as general.
2. My reasons for this action are:
L.-....-.--
-----------
, - - - - - - - -
a. On 24 Sep 96 you conspired with SrAL ----- -- ; ~ m n
30 invite Amni
; md - - - - - - - -
---------
i into a room for the purpose of committing an offense
upon
h the face and arms with your fist. As a result, you received kn
unlawfijly strike
Article 15, dated 24 Oct 96. Punishment was reduction to the grade of airman (suspended until
23 Apr 97), forfieiture of $228 pay, and 14 days extra duty. See Atch 1.
.......................
L - - - - - - - - - - - - , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - i, specZcally assault and battery, At that time, you did in fact,
.-.t .-.-....-. ....-.-
.......................
- - - - - - - - - -
-------- hi"--"-"
i . . . . . . . i
---------
b. On 1 Dec 96, you made verbal threats to SrAi
a Letter of Reprimand (LOR), dated 27 Jan 97. See Atch 2.
....-.-....-.-...
!. As a result, you received
c. On 26 Feb 97 and 27 Feb 97, you failed to go to your place of duty, Bldg 282, Tinker
AFB OK. You also did not make yourself available to be contacted about reporting for duty. As
a result, you received a Letter of Reprimand, dated 27 Feb 97. See Atch 3.
Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this
recommendation are attached. The commander exercising SPCM jurisdiction, or a higher
authority, will decide whether you will be discharged or retained in the Air Force and, if you are
discharged, how your service will be characterized. If you are discharged, you will be ineligible
for reenlistment.
3. You have the right to consult counsel. Military legal counsel bas been obtained to assist you.
I have made arrangements for you to consult Capt: ------------------ I at Bldg 452, Tinker AFB OK
on 24 March 1997, at 1030 hours, If it is necessary to change this appointment time, call Capt
Mobly's office at 4051739-7713. You may consult civilian counsel at your own expense.
g L d o l P o w g r for o 4 m r r i e a
4. You have the right to submit statements in your own behaK Any statements you want the
separation authority to consider must reach me by 25 March 1997, unless you request and receive
an extension for good cause shown. I will send them to the separation authority.
5. If you fail to consult counsel or to submit statements in your own behalf, your failure will
constitute a waiver of your right to do so.
6. You were scheduled for a medical examination on 19 Mar 97, and you should have reported to
the Tinker AFB Hospital, Physical Exam Section, on that date for the examination.
7. Any personal information you furnish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act of 1974. A
copy of AFI 36-3208 is available for your use in the orderly room.
.
8. Execute the attached acknowledgment and return it to me immediately.
C . . - . - . - . . . . - . - . . . . . . ~ . ~ . . . . ~ . ~ . ~ . . . . ~ . - . . . . . . ~ . ~ . . . . ~ . ~
Squadron Section Commander, 965 AACS
Attachments:
1. Art 15, dtd 24 Oct 96
2. LOR, dtd 27 Jan 97
3. LOR, dtd 27 Feb 97
4 Acknowledgment Ltr
AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00052
As a result, respondent received a Letter of Counseling, dated 17 Sep 9 3 . A n honorable discharge is the appropriate characterization when the airman's service has generally met Air Force standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for The authority for this action is AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208, Misconduct.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00473
The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of discharge. A1C-(EPR Indicates): 16 Mar 93-15 Nov 94. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: a. Reenlisted as SrA 8 May 96 for 4 yrs.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00044
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD03-0044 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. See Atch 4. e. On 9 Nov 96, AAFES reported that your account...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD01-00166
" - : . AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD s NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) | T GRADE AFSN/SSAN ine A1c |
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00402
I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for Misconduct: Minor Disciplinary Infractions, The authority for this action is AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.49. (See Attachment 1 d) Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this recommendation are attached, The commander exercising SPCM jurisdiction or higher authority will decide whether you will be discharged or retained in the United States Air Force and, if you are...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00379
The applicant was discharged with a general discharge for minor disciplinary infractions. As a result, yau received a Letter of Counseling, dated 10 Sep 92. See AtCh 3. d, On 19 Jan 93, you were drunk and disorderly a t Tinker AJ?B, OK. As a result, you received an U t i c l e 15, dated 3 Mazr 93.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00435
(Change Discharge to Honorable) Issue I: During my time of service I was not financially sound. For this you received a Letter of Reprimand, dated 9 ~ a r (Atch Id) 99. e. On or about 1 Mar 99, you neglected to accomplish your assigned duties. For this you received a Letter of Counseling, dated 1 Mar 99.
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00243
The misconduct included leaving the local area without approved leave, dereliction of duty, failure to follow verbal and written orders, failure to go, and disrespecting a commissioned officer on two separate occasions. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former SRA) (HGH SSGT) 1. You ,,-- & g ~ i f i q knownledge of a lawful order issued by 2Lt ; ..................... to remain at the commander's call and help out, an...
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00226
'I('E MEhlBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE A FSNISSAN AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD GEN I I PERSONAL APPEARANCE - -- .------A ~ s E ~ I N A M E b F COliNSFl AND OR ORGAN17A I ION - X ADDRESS AND OR OHAIR FORCE DISCIIARGK REVIEW BOARD IIECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE IVL1hlHF.R F])-2(,05-OUZ26 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. b. Grade Status: A m - 08 Nov 01 (Article 15, 8 Nov 01) SrA - 05 Dec 00 A1C - 05 Apr 99 A m - 05 Jun 98 AB - 05...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00081
(EF-V2) CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD03-0081 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. In view of the foregoing findings the board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. For your actions, you received a LOR on 19 February 1999 (Atch 6).