Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD01-00166
Original file (FD01-00166.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
"
- : . AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
s
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) | T GRADE AFSN/SSAN
ine A1c | 

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00252

    Original file (FD2006-00252.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    3RD FLOOR ANI)HF.WS AFB, ~ ~ ' 2 0 1 6 2 - 7 1 t O 2 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NllMBER FD-ZU06-00252 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of discharge. ...

  • AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00052

    Original file (FD01-00052.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    As a result, respondent received a Letter of Counseling, dated 17 Sep 9 3 . A n honorable discharge is the appropriate characterization when the airman's service has generally met Air Force standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for The authority for this action is AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208, Misconduct.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0352

    Original file (FD2002-0352.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN Fen id AIC TYPE | ™ , GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE _LX RECORD REVIEW COUNSEL. NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL YES NO xX VOTE OF THE BOARD MEMBERS SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY X xX X X X ISSUES INDEX NUMBER EXHIBITS SUBMITTED 1Q.THE BOARD A93.01, A93.19, A94,53 A67.10 1 | ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0408

    Original file (FD2002-0408.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    3 AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN AMN | ROU. For these acts of misconduct, the respondent received two records of individual counseling, four letters of reprimand, an Article 15 and a vacation action. Approve the discharge action and separate the respondent with a general discharge with or without P&R; c. Return the file to the unit with a recommendation to reinitiate the case with a recommendation for a...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00360

    Original file (FD2006-00360.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DlSCllARCE REVIEW BOARD ISIS COMMAND DR, EE WINC, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 10761-7001 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMHKH FD-2006-003M) GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable and to change the reenlistment code. The misconduct included driving without a license, failing to report to supervisor, misrepresenting himself as a senior noncommissioned officer and a...

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0098

    Original file (FD2002-0098.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    For these acts of misconduct, the respondent received a verbal counseling, a letter of counseling (LOC), a memorandum for record (MFR), four letters of reprimand (LOR), an unfavorable information file (UIF), entry on the control roster, and punishment under Article 15, UCM. (Tab 1) 4, EVIDENCE CONSIDERED FOR THE RESPONDENT: The respondent is a 22 year old security forces journéyman who enlisted in the Air Force on 7 May 97. f. On or about 10 Aug 98, you failed to go at the time to your...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00044

    Original file (FD2003-00044.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD03-0044 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. See Atch 4. e. On 9 Nov 96, AAFES reported that your account...

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0238

    Original file (FD2002-0238.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2002-0238 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH Alc) 1. Recommend an honorable discharge and forward the case file to the 14th Air Force/CC for disposition; MASTER OF SPACE ‘Jul .25 02 07:29a DPMAR 719-567-5516 p-28 FID 2002-0225" c. Approve a general discharge, but suspend its execution for a period of up to one year for probation and rehabilitation; or d. Order respondent to be retained in the Air...

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD01-00032

    Original file (FD01-00032.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD01-00032 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable, change the Reason for discharge and change the RE Code. ISSUES: The applicant was discharged with a General Discharge for Misconduct — Minor Disciplinary Infractions. Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD-01-00032 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former A1C) 1.

  • AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00021

    Original file (FD01-00021.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMEtER FD-01-0002 1 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge; thus, the applicant's discharge should not be changed. (Atch 1.3); d. On 28 Aug 98, she used the e-mail and internet on a government computer in-an inappropriate h W e r .