Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00151
Original file (FD2006-00151.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 

HEARING RECORD 

NAME OF SERVlCE MEMBER (I,AST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) 
............................. 

L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I  

TYPE  GEN 

X 

PERSONAL APPEARANCE 

CO"NStL 

NAME O F  COIJNS&I. ANI) OR ORCANI%A.I'ION 

YES 

No 

X 

MEMBER SITTING 

.................................. 
- 
- 

4 

7 

& - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I  

INnEX NllMRER 

A67.10 

ISSII*S 

A94.11 
A92.21 
A93.01 
A92.01 
A93.07 
A94.05 

GRADE 

A1C 

AFSNISSAN 
..-..-....-..-.- 
'.-..-..-..-..-! 

RECORD REVIEW 

ADDRESS AND O R  ORGANIZATION O F  COllNSEL 

VOTE OF THE BOARD 

1 ION 

GEN 

UOTHC 

OTHER 

DENY 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

1 
2 
3 
4 

EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD 

ORDER APPOIN'I'ING 'I'tIE BOARD 

APPLICATION  FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 
LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 
BRIEF OF PERSONNEL  FILE 
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD 
ADDITIONAL  EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF 
I'EKSONAL  APPEARANCE 

TAPE RECORDING  OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE  HE 

HEAHINC I>nl'E 

CASE NUMBER 

13 Jun 2007 
APPLICANT'S  ISSUE AND THE BOARD'S 

FD-2007-00151 

DECISIONAL RATIONAL ARE DISCUSSED ON TllE ATTACHED ALR  FORCE DISCHARGE 

REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE 

Case heard in Washington, D.C. via teleconference between Robins AFB, Georgia, and Andrews AFB, Maryland. 

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR 

Namcs and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request. 

X - Upgrade, RE Code, and Reason for Discharge 

TO: 

SAFIMRBR 
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 781 50-4742 

INDORSEMENT 

PROM: 

DATE:  6/18/2007 

SRCHWAHY OF'IHR AlH FORCE PERSONNEI.  COIJNCIL 
AIR FORCE 1)ISCHAHCP. RY.VIEW ROARn 
1535 COMMAND DR.  EE WING. 3HI) FI.OOH 
ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 

(EF-V2) 

Previous edition will be used 

AIR FORCE DTSCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE 

CASE NUMRER 

FD-2007-00151 

GENERAL:  The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and 
authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment  code. 

The applicant appeared and testified before the Discharge Review Board (DRB), without counsel, via video 
teleconference between Andrews AFB, MD and Robins AFB, GA on  13 Jun 2007.  The following witnesses 
also testified on the applicant's  behalf: her mother, Mrs. MB, and her father, Mr. DB. 

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge. 

FINDINGS:  Upgrade of discharge, change of reason and authority for discharge, and change of 
reenlistment code are denied.  The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the 
applicant substantiates an  inequity or inlpropriety that would justify  a change of discharge. 

ISSUES:  Applicant received a General discharge for Minor Disciplinary Infractions. 

Issue 1.  Applicant contends an impropriety in her discharge due to the marginal nature of the infractions on 
which it was based.  The records indicated the applicant received two Article  15s, two Letters of Reprimand, 
and one Record of Individual Counseling for misconduct.  The Board concluded that the misconduct, 
especially the assault that resulted in the applicant's  second Article  15, warranted administrative discharge. 
It appeared to the Board that the applicant was given several opportunities to change her behavior and yet 
she continued to engage in n~isconduct. This was evident following the applicant's  receipt of an LOR in 
May 2005 for misusing her government e-mail.  She was ordered by her supervisor on 3 1 May 2005 to check 
her e-mail only twice each day at specified time and yet she disobeyed this order the very next day by 
checking her e-mail without authorization.  The Board concluded the discharge, reason for discharge and 
reenlistment code was appropriate for the reasons which were the basis for this case. 

Issues 2 and 3.  Applicant contends an inipropriety  in her discharge in that only two of her four disciplinary 
actions were legally sufficient.  She states, relying on a memo from her defense counsel at the time of her 
discharge, that the 24 May 2005 LOR was not legally sufficient as it was given solely because an LOR that 
had been given to her just days before had been removed from the applicant's  PIF as it was not legally 
sufficient.  She also feels that the RIC given on 4 June 2005 was legally insufficient because it did not 
comply with AFI 36-2907 in that she was not offered the opportunity to respond, there was no Privacy Act 
statement on the form, and it does not state how long the applicant had to respond.  Regarding the contention 
that the LOR was legally  insufficient, the applicant admitted that she committed the misconduct documented 
in the LOR.  Furthermore, the LOR was served on the applicant within four duty days of the misconduct 
taking place.  Therefore, the Board could find no connection between the administration of the 24 May 2005 
LOR and any previous LORs that may have been withdrawn.  Regarding the RIC, while it appears that only 
the first page of the RIC was served on the member and that the member may not have been given the 
opportunity to respond, even if this were to be considered an oral counseling, as the applicant contends it 
should, the applicant again admits that she committed the misconduct in question and discharge action was 
initiated shortly thereafter.  The Board determined that this error did not constitute prejudicial  error, i.e., 
there was not substantial doubt that the discharge would have remained the same if the error had not been 
made.  Even if this were to be considered an oral counseling due to legal deficiencies, the extent and scope 
of the applicant's  misconduct makes it clear that discharge action was warranted and that a general service 
characterization was appropriate.  The characterization, reason for discharge and reenlistment code received 
by the applicant was found to be appropriate. 

Issue 4.  Applicant contends an impropriety in her discharge as her character of service more appropriately 
met the definition of "honorable"  in AFI 36-3208, rather than "general."  More specifically, she states that 
her service met the Air Force's  standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty and was so 
meritorious that any other characterization was inappropriate.  She states that the positive aspects of her 
military record outweigh the negative aspects.  However, the Board, much like the applicant's  chain of 
command, determined that this was not the case.  The applicant's  history of misconduct, especially the 
assault, eclipses any positive contributions made by the applicant during her time in the Air Force.  Her EPR 
ratings consist of a "3"  referral report, and two ratings of "4,"  While the EPRs were generally good, they 
certainly don't paint the applicant as a star performer.  Therefore, the Board found no impropriety or 
inequity in the applicant's  discharge characterization, reason for discharge or reenlistment code. 

Issue 5.  The applicant cites as an  impropriety that she was not given probation  and rehabilitation (P&R) by 
the separation authority and she was not moved to another duty section and given another chance, as 
suggested by her defense counsel during discharge processing.  During the hearing, the applicant conceded 
that P&R is a discretionary act by the commander and was not mandated in her case.  Given the applicant's 
history of repeated misconduct, even after being given multiple opportunities to correct her behavior, it was 
entirely reasonable that the applicant's  chain of command did not give her yet another chance or grant her 
P&R.  The applicant admits that the misconduct was her own fault and does not attempt to claim that she is 
innocent of the alleged offenses.  While the Board commends the applicant for accepting responsibility for 
her misconduct, this is not a matter of inequity or impropriety which would warrant an upgrade. 

CONCLUSIONS:  The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the 
procedural  and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the 
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. 

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for 
upgrade of discharge, change the reason and authority for the discharge, or change the reenlistment code, 
thus the applicant's characterization, reason and authority for discharge and reenlistment code should not be 
changed. 

Attachment: 
Examiner's Brief 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR  FORCE 

AIR  FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 

ANDREWS AFB,  MD 

(Former A1C)  (HGH SRA) 

1.  MATTER UNDER REVIEW:  Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr USAF Luke AFB, AZ on 20 Jul 
05 UP AFI 36-3208, para 5.49  (Misconduct -  Minor Disciplinary Infractions). 
Appeals for an Honorable Discharge, to Change the RE Code, and Reason for 
Discharge. 

2.  BACKGROUND: 

a. DOB: 12 Oct 83.  Enlmt Age: 17 7/12.  Disch Age: 21 9/12. Educ: HS DIPL. 

AFQT: N/A.  A-74,  E-64,  G-66,  M-46. PAFSC: 2W151 -  Aircraft Armament Systems 
Journeyman. DAS: 18 Apr 02. 

b.  Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 12 May 01 -  07 Aug 01  (2 months 26 days)(Inactive). 

3 .   SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: 

a.  Enlisted as AB 8 Aug 02 for 6 yrs. Svd: 03 Yrs 11 Mo 13 Das, all AMS. 

b.  Grade Status:  A1C -  28 Sep 04 (Article 15, 28 Sep 04) 

SrA -  21 Jan 04 
A1C -  21 Sep 01 

c.  Time Lost:  None. 

d.  Art 15's:  (1) 28 Sep 04, Luke AFB, AZ -  Article 128.  You did, at or 
near Surprise, Arizona, on or about 5 Aug 04, commit an 
assault upon AlC: 
: b y  striking her in the 
face with your flst, In the stomach with the shaft of a 
golf club, and in the lower jaw with the shaft of a golf 
club.  Reduction to Airman  (reduction below A1C 
suspended).  Forfeiture of $400.00 pay per month for two 
months, and a reprimand. (No appeal) (No mitigation) 

,.~..~..~..~..~..~..~..~..- 
* - - - - - - - . - - - - -   - - - - - - - - - - - I  

(2) 19 Mar 02, Sheppard AFB, TX -  Article 92.  You, who 

knew or should have known of your duties, on or about 26 
Jan 02, were derelict in the performance of those duties 
in that you willfully failed to refrain from consuming 
alcoholic beverages while under the legal drinking age 
of 21 and from frequenting a local hotel, as it was your 
duty to do.  Article 107.  You, did, on or about 8 Feb 
02, with intent to deceive, sign an official statement, 
to wit: AF Form 1168, Statement of 
Suspect/Witness/Complaint in reference to incident on or 
about 26 Jan 02, which statement was totally false, and 
was then known by you to be so false.  Suspended 
reduction to Airman.  Forfeiture of 619.00 pay. 

(No appeal)  (No mitigation) 

e.  Additional: RIC, 06 APR 05 -  Failure to obey a lawful order. 

LOR, 24 MAR  05 -  Misuse of a government computer. 
LOR, 22 MAR  04 -  Failure to go. 

f  .  CM:  None. 

g.  Record of SV: 08 Aug 01 -  07 Apr 03  Luke AFB  4  (Initial) 

08 Apr 03 -  07 Apr 04  Luke AFB  4  (Annual) 
08 Apr 04 -  11 Feb 05  Luke AFB  3  (CR0)REF 

h.  Awards &  Decs:  NDSM, GWOTSM, AFTR, AFOUA. 

i.  Stmt of Sv:  TMS: (04) Yrs  (02) Mos  (09) Das 
TAMS:  (03) Yrs  (11) MOS  (13) Das 

4.  BASTS ADVANCED  FOR REVIEW:  Appln  (DD Fm 293) dtd 20 Apr 07. 

(Change Discharge to Honorable, Change the RE Code, and Reason for 

Discharge) 

ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF. 

ATCH 
1. Applicant's Issues. 
2. Eight Character References. 
3. Congressional Correspondence. 
4 .   DD Form 214. 
5. DD Form 149. 

April 19,2007 

1 

To:  Members of the Air Force Discharge Review Board 

I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -  

From:  i 

L.-..-....-..-.-..--------. 

I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -  

1, ; -..-.-..-....-..--- 
i,  respectfdly submit the following personal statement in an effort to apologize for the many 
mistakes that I have made during my career in the Air Force.  Looking back as a much more mature 23 year old, 
I can now see how I could have done so many things differently. In life we are not allowed the luxury of doing 
the opportunity to learn fiom it and apply the lessons to our future. This I continue to do both in 
it over -just 
my personal and professional life. 

Unfortunately, I did not foresee the many consequences of my actions, poor judgments and bad decisions. I 
could not see how it would all eventually lead to the disappointment that I would cause myself and ultimately 
my family. I did not have the maturity needed to carefully evaluate the future cost of my actions by looking at a 
situation and doing what was right instead of what I felt was right.  At that time, I had not gone through the 
many difficult circumstances that allow you to obtain the lessons that one acquires when put in a position to 
have to learn from mistakes made. I did not realize the benefits of seeking support from others, having a 
positive attitude, making the required changes, and lastly taking the advice of those who care about me and have 
been there for me time and time again, 

When I joined the Air Force I was 17 years old, and had graduated from high school two months before. Based 
on the age requirement in Georgia, I graduated fiom high school one year early.  Within ten months of my 
enlistment I was stationed at Luke Air Force Base in Arizona, married and expecting my first child.  I worked 
on the flight line loading bombs on F-16 aircrafts and was not able to perform my job duties due to the 
pregnancy. I was reassigned to another job.  Combined with the added stress of learning a new job, I began to 
realize that I was in an abusive relationship as well. My husband (A higher ranking Airman two years my 
senior.) began to display actions associated with an inability to manage his anger, by physically assaulting me, 
as well as verbally and emotionally abusing me.  I brought this situation to the attention of his superiors on base 
and was told to call the police if the problem came up again.  I ended up calling the police on more than one 
occasion over the next year and a half. 

After my daughter was born it was hard finding daycare for her because my husband and I were both put on 
swing shift because of our flight line jobs. Many times we had to work on weekends or were expected to 
participate in base activities. We were both fairly new at parenting as well as to the Phoenix area and often had 
problems finding a baby sitter on the weekends when we both had to work or volunteer for events on base.  I 
tried my best to deal with the many new challenges that I was facing at work and in my personal life, but many 
times the stress of it all affected me negatively. There were times when as a result of not knowing how to handle 
some of the situations faced, I did not meet some of my obligations and responsibilities. I did what I felt was the 
right thing to do when in fact it may not have been. I was facing a very stressful time and many times felt like I 
was alone in dealing with it dl.  My husband was not very supportive and I ended up handling many aspects of 
my daughter's care on my own. In doing what I thought was best, mistakes were made.  One weekend, due to a 
misunderstanding of procedures and caring for a sick baby, I failed to report for weekend duty and as a result 
received a LOR for it. 

While in the Air Force I started taking college courses in the evenings in an effort to continue my education 
and eventually earn a Bachelor's degree.  Although my classload added to my hectic schedule: with work and a 
family, it was a challenge I enjoyed. In my college classes I was applying myseIf more than when in high 
school. Succeeding in my efforts with my classes enabled me to deal with the stress that I was facing in my 
home life and at work. Things were hard for me at times, but I tried my best to keep it all going. ~ u r i n ~  
this 
period I did all that I could to cope with the increasing difficulties in my marriage as well. 

p p p a  7--&LS-/ 
, Almost two years into our marriage the situation involving my abusive husband was getting worse. When the 
physical abuse got so bad that J was going to work with bruises on my face, I was finally able to get help from 
the Air Force with the domestic violence situation that I had been dealing with, My husband's behavior which 
had led to the abuse he had been inflicting on me was addressed, He was ordered to lehve our apartment for a 
few days and to start attending a mandatory Anger Management course. We were both ordered to get marriage 
counseling. The counseling sessions did not help because he refused to realize that he had a problem. Even after 
being arrested following an abusive incident the physical, verbal, and emotional abuse did not stop. I felt that I 
had no other choice but to divorce him.  I was 21 years old, working full time, going to school part time, and 
raising my young daughter by myself.  7 felt that I had to do what was necessary to make a better life for myself 
and my child. Through all these tribulations I pressed on and continued 'to do well at whatever job duties I was 
assigned and worked hard on my classes as well, As a result of performing above expectations, I received good 
ratings on my yearly EPR's and took advantage of any training opportunities that became available to me. 

Although I tried my best to maintain my career, raise my daughter, and continue my education, I was very 
emotionally unstable.  The stress of what I had been going through for the past year and a half had taken its' toll 
on my emotional and mental state. At that time an incident involving my husband (the divorce was still 
pending) and his current girlfriend, (also an Airman and who initiated the incident) resulted in an assault and 
caused me to receive an Article 15, and lose a stripe.  I accepted my punishment and realized my mistake in not 
using better judgment, considering the consequences of my actions and letting my emotions get the better of me 
during a confrontational situation. I continued to do the best I could in taking care of my many responsibilities 
including work, my daughter, and school all the while dealing with the stress of a pending divorce. 

A few months after my divorce was final, another'incident involving my ex-husband occurred. This incident 
escalated into what could have been a volatile situation based on the initial actions of my ex-husband and the 
subsequent actions of my boyfriend who was also an Airman,  I tried my best to dissolve the situation and when 
it became apparent that I could not, I took myself and my daughter out of a potentially dangerous situation and 
left the location.  A few weeks later to my surprise, I was issued a LOR because of what had taken place 
between my ex-husband and my boyfriend.  I decided to appeal the LOR since because I was not at fault for 
what had happened. With the help of my area defense counsel, I was successful in getting this LOR appealed 
and withdrawn from my files. I felt discouraged and angry about the situation I was facing in having to 
continually deal with my ex-husband and felt like I had been deliberately accused by him for an incident that he 
initiated. What I was not aware of was that once this wrongful LOR had been issued it led to a decision by my 
superiors to start on an administrative discharge against me for misconduct. The discharge proceedings 
continued even after the LOR was appealed and taken out of my file. Following that incident, I was still 
experiencing a very stressful time at work due to a recent job assignment, continued difficulties in dealing with 
my ex-husband, and other personal matters.  I used bad judgment in deciding one day to send an email on my 
military email account which was not work related and highly inappropriate. This resulted in an LOR which 
was later added to the on-going discharge proceedings. Shortly after that LOR was issued I was given notice 
that I would be discharged fiom the Air Force.  I fought the discharge as best I could in the time that I had to do 
so, and my 
Captain; -------- irepresented me well and stated why it would not be in the Air Force's best interest for me to be 
discharged. This was based on my overall. time in the Air Force, my job performance, and taking into account 
the many challenges that I had faced during my time of service. She also stressed that if I was discharged, then 
it should be nothing less than an Honorable discharge based on my overall job performance during the four 
years that I served. Unfortunately the discharge proceedings went through and a within a few weeks I was given 
a General under Honorable Conditions Discharge. 

area defense counsel presented a case on my behalf against the discharge proceedings. 

, - -  - military 

- - - - . 

Needless to say this devastating blow left me feeling quite disappointed in myself. I realized that I had let 
myself, my family, and iny country down. My family has a long tradition of serving in the military.  No one had 
ever gone through what I had brought upon myself, and for that I felt ashamed and undeserving of any 
sympathy from them. Here I had the opportunity to do so much more with my career and instead this was where 
all my bad decisions, poor judgment, and immatwity had led me and I had no one to blame but myself. 

1 

My only choice was to deal with it, learn from it, pick up the pieces of my life, and move on. Duiing a month of 
job hunting, I had the time to reflect on my Air Force career and the insight to realize thit I needed to make 
some changes in myself, develop a better attitude, grow up, and make better choices both personally and 
professionally as a result of all that had happened to me in the past four years. 

F V 7 r n I s l  

. 

Fortunately for me I was able to get a position with a company which has a long tradition of hiring people with 
military background. My training, work ethic, and dedication to doing my best at any assigned duty resulted in a 
great opportunity with Cintas, a Fortune 500 company.  I have been employed with this company since August 
2005, shortly after my discharge from the Air Force.  As a result of the changes which have manifested from 
self-improvement, maturity, the right attitude and lessons learned, I am now proudly able to incorporate the core 
values that I learned in the Air Force; integrity, service before self, excellence in all I do.  I thoroughly enjoy my 
job at Cintas and can see that my attitude, my actions, and my commitment to excelling at what I do will lead to 
my success with the company.  I have to do what is right and what is required of me in every given situation. 

After one year with the company I was promoted to my current position of Service Sales Representative and 
was granted a transfer to the Atlanta area. I relocated my family and we are now living close to my parents and 
extended family. More than ever I realize the importance of family and I am so appreciative of my family's 
continued support in helping me to overcome all that I have been through since leaving home and developing 
into the person that I am today.  I know that I can now become a better role model for my younger brother. 

With my training and experience in the Air Force, I haye matured into a responsible adult and now have the 
ability to be a valuable asset to any organization that I am a part of.  Not only have I matured but I also realize 
the importance of complying with d e s  and regulations.  I truly feel that I now have what it takes to be a 
positive and productive member of the Air Force.  I believe, as do the people who wrote letters on my behalf, 
that I have tremendous potential and now have what it takes to reach the goals that I set for myself.  I am proud 
and honored to have been given the opportunity to serve my country. Should that opportunity ever present it self 
again, I will proudly be honored to serve in whatever capacity that my skills and abilities are required. I am 
extremely grateful to the United States Air Force for giving me a head start on my career at the young age of 17. 

In closing, I am truly remorseful for my past actions, bad decisions, use of poor ju'dgrnent, and immaturity.  I 
continue to work hard so that this period of my life does not characterize me presently or the person I am 
evolving into. I ask for your mercy in looking at my entire record as well as what I have done to turn my life 
around since my discharge. I am requesting that you give a thorough reconsideration of my General discharge 
and change it to Honorable, allowing me to retain all my veteran benefits and to rejoin the Air Force and serve 
my country proudly. I can build on the training that I have received, now that I have fully matured into a 
responsible adult who works hard, has the right attitude, and takes her responsibilities seriously.  I am planning 
to enroll in classes at Georgia Perimeter College this fall. Being eligible to receive the G.I. Bill would be a 
significant help to me because I do not get tuition reimbursement as a job benefit. Please consider the 
information given in this personal statement as well as the other information that have been provided by others 
on my behalf before making a final decision regarding my case.  Thank you in advance for your time and 
consideration. 

Sincerely, 

,-----------------------------------------------------------------------------. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 

N T H  MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS SQUADRON 

LUKE AFB. ARIZONA 85309 

MEMORANDlJM FOR AlC;----------------------------.--------------: 

............................................ 

o r   J-3L  z o o r  

FROM:  56 MOSICC 

SlJBJECT: Notification  Memorandum 

1.  1 am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for Misconduct: Minor 
Disciplinary Infractions.  The authority for this action is AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208, paragaph 
5.49.  If  my recommendation  is approved, your service will be characterized as either Honorable or 
Under Honorable Conditions (General).  1 am recommending that your service be characterized as 
an Undcr Honorable Conditions (General) Discharge. 

2.  My teason for this action is: 

a.  On or about 20 Mar 04, at or near Luke Air Force Rase, Arizona, you  failed to rcport to 
duty.  For this misconduct, you received a Lctter of Reprimand, dnted 22 Mar 04. 

-----------.------- 

b.  On or about 5 Aug 04, at or near Surprise, Arizona, you did, commit an assault upon 
Airman  First Class: ------------------- i by striking her in the facc with your fist, in thc 
stomach with thc shaft of a golf club, and in the lower jaw with a golfclub.  For this 
misconduct,  you reccived an Article  15, dnted 28 Sep 04.  Your punishment included o 
reduction to E-2 with reduction to E-3 suspended, forfeiture of $400.00 pay per month for 
two months and a reprimand.  This action established the creation of an Unfkvorable 
Information  File (UIF). 
-..-..-..-..-..- 
c,  On or about  18 May 05, you >flrap.rmfas email letter to Airn~an : 
i with a 
copy directed to Senior Airman:- --- --- --- --- -- :.  For this misconduct, you received a Letter 
of Reprimand, dated 24 May 05. 

L..-..-..-..-..- 

d.  On or about 3 1  May 05, you failed to comply with the order of an NCO  in that you 
thiled to stay off your work Email and the Internet.  For this misconduct, you received a 
Record of Individual Counseling dated 4 Jun 05. 

(:opies  of the documents to be [orwarded  to the separation authority in support ofthis 
recommendation are attached.  The commander exercising SPCM jurisdiction  or higher 
authority will decide whether you will be discharged or retained in the United States Air Force 
and,  if you nre discharged, how your service will be characterized. If you are discharged, you 
will be ineligible for reenlistment in thc Air Force and any special pay, bonus.  or education 
ossivtancc funds may bc subjcct to recouprnent.  The separation authority will make the findings 
and  recommendations required under  10 U.S.C. Section 2005(g). 

3.  You have the right to consult counsel. Military lc~a!-c~ungj-~sb-q~zobtained 
have nlade an appointment for you  to consult Captain; ..................... 
Bldg. 1  150, ext 6701, on 
counsel at your own expense. 

hours.  You may consult civilian 

to assist you.  I 
bt 7383 N. Litchfield Rd., 

r'  5 c. 

I 

, a t   1 7 3 0  

4.  You have the right to submit statements in your own behalf.  Any statements you want the 
unless you request and 
separation authority to consider must reach me by 
receive an extension for good cause shown. 1 will send then] to the separation authority. 

5.  If you fail to consult counsel or to submit statements in your own behalf,  your failure will 
constitute a waiver of your right to do so. 

6.  You have been scheduled for a nicdical examination.  You must report to 56th Medical  Group, 
on 
medical examination.  You must retrieve your medical records from 56th Medical Group Hospital 
Outpatient Records and immediately report to Physical  Exams. Building 8 10, with your medical 
records and your copy of this discharge file for the medical examination. 

Ilours for the cxamination.  You have k e n  scheduled  for a 

, at 

7.  Any personal information you firnish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act of 1974. A copy 
of AFI 36-3208 is available for your use at your unit's orderly room. 

return it to me irnmediarel~,- -- --- -- 
8.  Execute the attached acknowledbment and , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -  

Attachments: 
I .   Supporting Docurncnts 

a.  Letter of Reprimand, dated 22 Mar 04 
b.  Article  IS. datcd 28 Sep 04 
c.  Letter of Kcprimand, dated 24 May 05 
d.  Record of Individual Counseling, dated 6 Jun 05 

2.  Keccipt of Notification  Memorandum 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00296

    Original file (FD2005-00296.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DRB concluded that the applicant was personally responsible for arriving on time for work and appointments. Applicant stated that after she submitted a Congressional about her case her chain of command retaliated by discharging her with a General under honorable conditions discharge. For your actions, you receive a Record of Individual Counseling (ROIC) dated 14 Oct 04; and b.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2001-0484

    Original file (FD2001-0484.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD2001-0484 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable, change of reason for discharge and change of reenlistment code. Attachment Examiner's Brief FD2001-0484 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (HGH A1C) 1. I joined the USAF at the age of 17, right out of high school.

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2004-00090

    Original file (FD2004-00090.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    My recruiter informed me of the 100% tuition assistance the Air Force offered, as well as the opportunity to become a commissioned officer upon completing my degree. For this misconduct, you received an LOR. Military 1 I have made an appointment for you to consult Capt as been obtained to assist you.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0144

    Original file (FD2002-0144.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    When I was midway through basic training, I asked for a job that was less than the one I would be good at, although still desirable, one I thought would be good for me. I realize this every time I look at what I could have in the service and what time I did not use properly. For this misconduct, he received an AF Form 174, Record of Individual Counseling, on 22 Feb 0 1. was, at Fort Leonard Wood MO and a onco commissioned office received an LOR on 23 Jan 01.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00412

    Original file (FD2003-00412.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The records indicated the applicant received two Article 15s. Additionally, he received three Letters of Reprimand, three Letters of Counseling and three Memorandums for Record for failure to obey an order, sleeping on duty, disrespectful towards a superior NCO, failure to go, dereliction of duty, unprofessional attitude, poor work ethic, violation of dress and appearance standards, failure to comply with instructions, unauthorized use of a government computer, and financial...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0466

    Original file (FD2002-0466.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In view of the foregoing findings the board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2002-0466 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH Al1C) 1. An Article 15, dated 31 Jan 02, evidences your misconduct, Your punishment included reduction to E-1 and restriction to Luke Air Force Base for 45 days.

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00097

    Original file (FD2005-00097.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The records indicated the applicant received three Article 15s, five Letters of Reprimand, and five Records of Individual Counseling for misconduct. That was when, due to my actions, the paperwork was started to discharge me Under Honorable Conditions h m the Air Force. For this incident, you received a Record of Individual Counseling, dated 2 Apr 02. g. On or about 27 Sep 0 1, you failed to pay your debt when you uttered a check for $1700.00 and did not have sufficient funds to honor that check.

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00347

    Original file (FD2005-00347.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD REVIEW X ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING I HON ( GEN UOTHC OTHER I DENY 1 ISSUES A92.21 - - - - - - - - - I INDEX NUMBER A67.10 IIEARING DATE 1 1 03 May 2006 I 1 CASENUMBER I FD-2005-00347 I 1 1 1 I 1 2 3 4 EXHIBITS SUBMKITED TO THE BOARD ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL...

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0277

    Original file (FD2002-0277.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    i A94.05, A93.09, A92.15 A67.50 1 | ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 | LETTER OF NOTIFICATION HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 4 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE 02-12-18 FD2002-0277 COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITYED AT TIME OF | PERSONAL APPEARANCE Case heard at Washington, D.C. CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | 002-0277 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Her misconduct...

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00038

    Original file (FD2005-00038.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. It was after I was caught using marijuana, that I began receiving medications fiom the clinic. He also said that it would be best not to pursue a medical discharge, which I went along with in part because I...