Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00071
Original file (FD2006-00071.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
1 

1 

I 

I 

1 

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD IIEARlNG RECORD 

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (I.AST, FIRST MIDDLE INI1I\L) 

SRA 

,..-.-.-......-. 

C.............., 

PERSONAL APPEARANCE 

NAME OF COUNSEI, AND O R  ORGANIZATION 

RECORD REVIEW 

X 
r\UURESS  AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL 

MEMBER SITTING 

I 

VOTE OP THE BOARD 

L......-.-.-......---------' 
TYPE  UOTH 

YES 

No 

X 

I 

I 

4 

+ 

L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -  

IbSUFS 

A94.05 

INDEX NUMBER 

A66.00 

+ * 
+ * 
' 

X 

1 
2 
1  3 
4 

EXHIBITS SUBMITTED 'I'O THE BOARD 

OI

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00023

    Original file (FD01-00023.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DEClSlONAL RATlOh ALE CASE NCMBER FD-01-00023 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable applicant w a s o i l k u d a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Baard_hutdeclined to %e exercise this right. Applicant was discharged for misconduct, drug abuse. -I am requesting the Air Force Discharge Review Board to consider specific issues which in my opinion form a basis for upgrading my administrative discharge from the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-1996-00259A

    Original file (BC-1996-00259A.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: The applicant’s counsel reviewed the evaluations and states that a perfectly decent laboratory says the specimen is tainted and the Air Force says the results are inconclusive. The results did not conclusively demonstrate that there was no match between the specimen and the collected DNA sample from the applicant. The AFIP/CME-DNA evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2005-00416

    Original file (FD2005-00416.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (1,AST. The records also show that the member was offered an administrative discharge board but waived his right to a hearing. Article 15, dated 14 Jan 05 w/ attachments

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00144

    Original file (FD2006-00144.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: a. Enlisted as AB 27,Sep 01 for 4 yrs. i .------------------------------------ P 14 April 2006 Attachment B Page 1 of 2 I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I 9 i honestly declare that: My discharge from the Air Force was unjudy MEMORANDUM FOR ALL REVIEWING AUTHORITIES FROM: : SUBJECT: Statement of situation occunred. Along with a submitting a rebuttal to my LOR, I requested via my attorney...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00238

    Original file (FD2003-00238.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Appeals for Honorable Discharge, and to Change the RE Code, Reason and Authority for Discharge. (Change Discharge to Honorable, Change the RE Code, Reason and Authority for Discharge) Issue 1: I have no prior use of marijuana. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for drug abuse.

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2005-00353

    Original file (FD2005-00353.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. I go through this lengthy explanation about the medication for several reasons, One of the reasons is to point out that it took some time to locate a testing facility; there was some confusion about retention...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06979-00

    Original file (06979-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    in which his division officer, LT (G) upon returning ETCS (St.C) recalls an event on March 17, 1997 aboard USS SAIPAN from morning officers' call, informed him that the CSD division had been selected for urinalysis screening. that had the whatever division I am in. contention that CSF division was selected only because you were a However, every individual who testified member of that division.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0396

    Original file (FD2002-0396.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    e. Additional: AETC 173, 26 OCT 01 - Failing block 4 test. DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR EDUCATION AND TRAINING COMMAND 1 1 Feb 02 MEMORANDUM FOR 782 TRGICC FROM: 82 TRWIJAC SUBJECT: Legal Review, Recommendation for Discharge - a , - - - - - that - - - - - - the 1. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - be discharged from the s&icedi6-t0 his L _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I - - - - - - - - - - - - - i that he 3.

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2002-0423

    Original file (FD2002-0423.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PLACE R h e i n - M a i n A i r B a s e , G E c. DATE 2 7 A u g u s t 1 9 8 7 I Referred for trial to the s p e c i a l t h i s h e a d a u a r t e r s d a t e d 24 August court-martial convened by S p e c i a l Order AA-17 19 . The 435 discharge. SSg d USAF Rhei n-Mai n C l i n i c/CC both recommend a UOTHC has received two APRs d u r i n g her c u r r e n t en1 i s t m e n t UNIT ED STATES AIR FORCE SEPTEMBER 18,1947 Right People.

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00013

    Original file (FD2006-00013.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    1 (TYPE GEN YES ) No I I I (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) PERSONAL APPEARANCE MEMBER SITTING AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD 1 AFSNISSAN ' GRADE A l C I I x I I RECORDREVIEW I ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL -m - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - a ISSUES A92.01 1 INDEX NUMBER A67.70 HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER X*+ X*+ X*+ EXHIBITS SUBMITTED, TO THE BOARD ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF...