1
(TYPE GEN
YES
)
No
I
I
I
(LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
MEMBER SITTING
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
1 AFSNISSAN
' GRADE
A l C
I
I x
I
I RECORDREVIEW
I
ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
-m
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - a
ISSUES A92.01
1
INDEX NUMBER
A67.70
HEARING DATE
CASE NUMBER
X*+
X*+
X*+
EXHIBITS SUBMITTED, TO THE BOARD
ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
I TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE
1
2
3
4
1
22 Aug 2006
,APPLICANT'S ISSUE XUD THEB0.4RL)'S DECISIONAL RATIONAL ARI: DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DlSCHhRGE KEVIEW BOARD DECISION,ZL KATlONLE
FD-2006-00013
I
I
I
Case heard in Washington, D.C.
1 Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withiwithout counsel, and the right to
submit an application to the AFBCMR
1 Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request.
*Reason and Authority
+Reenlistment Code
.-----------------------------------------.--.-----------------------------------------------------------
I.
IR~ORSEMENT
DATE: 8/23/2006
TO:
SAFlMRBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742
1
SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR
ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
(EF-V2)
Previous edition will be used
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER
FD~2006-00013
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and
authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise this right.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge, change of reason and authority for discharge, and change of
reenlistment code are denied.
The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an
inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.
ISSUE:
Issue 1. Although not explicitly stated, the applicant suggested that her misconduct was inequitable because
it was too harsh and she was discharged for something she didn't do. The records indicated the applicant
received two Letters of Reprimand for misconduct. The first Letter of Reprimand was for failing to go to her
appointed place of duty at the time prescribed. The second Letter of Reprimand and basis for discharge was
for wrongfully using methamphetamines, "ecstasy", cocaine and marijuana on divers occasions. The Board
concluded the misconduct was a significant departure from conduct expected of all military members. The
characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate.
Issue 2. Applicant states that her discharge did not take into account the good things she did while in the
service. The DRB took note of the applicant's duty performance as documented by her performance reports,
letters of recommendation and other accomplishments. They found the seriousness of the willful misconduct
offset any positive aspects of the applicant's duty performance. The Board concluded the discharge was
appropriate for the reasons which were the basis for this case.
Issue 3. The DRB was pleased to see that the applicant was doing well and pursuing a degree in paralegal
studies. However, no inequity or impropriety in her discharge was suggested or found in the course of the
hearing. The Board concluded the misconduct of the applicant appropriately characterized her term of
service.
Issue 4. The applicant cited her desire to receive the G.I. Bill benefits as justification for upgrade. The DRB
noted that when the applicant applied for these benefits, she signed a statement (DD Form 2366, on
June 19,2002) that she understood she must receive an Honorable discharge to receive future educational
entitlements. The Board was sympathetic to the impact the loss of these benefits was having on the
applicant, but this is not a matter of inequity or impropriety which would warrant an upgrade.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
(Former A1C) (HGH A1C)
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr USAF Travis AFB, CA on 12 Sep
05 UP AFI 36-3208, para 5.54 (Misconduct - Drug Abuse). Appeals for Honorable
Discharge, and to Change the RE Code, Reason and Authority for Discharge.
2. BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 4 Jun 76. Enlmt Age: 26 1/12. Disch Age: 29 3/12. Educ: HS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A. A-47, E-39, G-51, M-52. PAFSC: 33452 - Liquid Fuel Systems
Maintenance Journeyman. DAS: 16 Nov 02.
b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 18 May 02 - 3 Jun 02 (16 Days) (Inactive).
3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Enlisted as Amn 4 Jun 02 for 6 yrs. Svd: 03 Yrs 03 Mo 09 Das, all AMS.
b. Grade Status: A1C - 19 Jul 02
c. Time Lost: None.
d. Art 15's: None.
e. Additional: LOR, 19 JUL 05 - Returning late from lunch.
LOR, 14 JUL 05 - Wrongfully used illegal drugs on numerous
occasions.
f. CM: None.
g. Record of SV: 04 Jun 02 - 15 Jan 04 Travis AFB 5 (HAF Dir)
16 Jan 04 - 20 Aug 04 Travis AFB 5 (CRO)
h. Awards & Decs: AFTR, NDSM, GWOTSM, AFOUA W/1 OLC.
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (03) Yrs (03) Mos (25) Das
TAMS: (03) Yrs (03) Mos (09) Das
4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 5 Jan 06.
(Change Discharge to Honorable, and Change the RE Code, Reason and Authority
for Discharge)
ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF.
ATCH
1. Applicant's Issues.
2. Response to LOR, 15 Jul 05.
3 . Notification Memorandum, 18 Aug 05.
4. LOR, 14 Jul 05.
APPLICATION FOR THE REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
FROM THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES
(PYease mad instructions on P a p a 3 and 4 BEFORE compbtlng thh appViet1on.l
F o m w o w e d
OMB No. 07044704
ExpSres Aug 3 1,2006
Th. pvblk rmponng bvkn lo, thh soUtzllm of btfarmnmn b m&nstad to mrw 30 mhut.8 pr nspom. holudlng th. U r n tor revkvlng I ~ l ~ W ~ ~ c t l o n r ,
gathmhp md m h m i n g dm d m d m d , m d comp*ting m d nvi.nmg th. coU.clbn of ntolm.lbn. S n d km-w
of Informmtlon, ndudlng .ugg.&na
the natwithmd(n0 my odwt provwbn of law, na r&on thN b. r\lb)rct m m y m a w k r Maw m
a - 1
BACK OF ,?HIS Pi+.
npvdlnp thk burdm m a t . or m y omu .cpst of thu solktbn
for rmduchp tha bvdm, to tha hp.pummt of CWwue, E a r u U w S m u s md Cornmunb.tlon Diraalurdu 1070C0004). Mrpondno should b. awn-
ly wim l collrtbn ot h f m n m h n tf n doas nol dirpby l o m ~ d vdld OMB
rumbr. PLEASE DO NOT RFIWRN Y&R FORM TO THE NO& O ~ Q A W I Z A T K ) N ~ ~
COMPLETB) FORM TO THE AP#K)#UATE A ~ R E S ~ ON
wuchmp mxuthg data l o ~ c u ,
-
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
- .
- .
AUTHORITY: 10 U.S.C. 1563: E.O. 9397.
PRINCIPAL WFIWSE(6): To apply for a change In the characterization or reason for mllitary discharge issued to an individual.
ROUTINE USEIS): None.
DISCLOSURE: Voluntarv: however, failure to ~ r o v i d e identifying Information may impede processing of this application. The request for
- ~-
- ~-
Social Security Number Ir strictly ti assure proper identificationof the individualBnd-appropriate records.
Social Security Number Ir strictly ti assure proper identificationof the individualBnd-appropriate records.
1. APPUCANT DATA (The person whose discharge Is to be reviewed). PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE INFORMATION.
1. APPUCANT DATA (The person whose discharge Is to be reviewed). PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE INFORMATION.
m. EiRJWCH OF SERVICE IX O M ) \
~.E~RJWCHOFSERVICEIXOM)
b., M
b., M
T b x * OF DISCHARQE OR SEPARATION 1 4. DISCHARGE CHARACTERIZATION RECEIVED (xonel
T b x * of DlSCHARQE OR SEPARATION 1 4. DISCHARGE CHARACTERIZATION RECEIVED (xonel
( MY (
) M y 1
Lwt~Fjczlczl bMdla &a80 - ,. -. -. . -. . .
Lwt~Fjczlczl bMdla &a80 - ,. -. -. . -. . .
c. aworJRIlrK AT DlSmARGE
c. a ~ o r J R I l r K AT DlSmARGE
1 MARW CORPS
)MARWCORPS
+ . S m C 85FYAITYNWP.. - ... -. -
+ . S m C 85FYAITYNWP.. -. . - . -
1 COAST GUARD
ALC
ALC
I I-..
NAW
AIR FORCE
€3
€3
Y u
I
a
a
+
J
IWWMMDDI /If dele Lt mom rhan 16 years
IWWMMDDI /If dele Lt mom rhan 16 years
ego, submit a DD Form 149)
HONORABl
' MONORABLE
3. UNIT AND LOCATI~N ,AT DISCHARGE
OR IEPARA'IYON
UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS
BAD CONDUCT ISpecbl murtmsniel o h )
UNCHARACTU\IZEO
IExpIaint
5. BOARD ACTION REQUESTED l ~ o n e l ~
5. BOARD ACTION REQUESTED IXonel
~ W A N G E TO HONORABLE
w .,
C W E TO OENeRWJUNMA
HONORABLE CONDITIONS
CHANGE TO UNCHARACtERlZED
(Nor apdiceble for Alr FiKcel
CHANQE NARRATIVE REASON FOR
SEPA+TION TO:
E x ? ~ r ~ . . a n O ~ ~ e r v i ~
onti tide in Ire 14. See imtrucrions on
.
)(
counsel/r~esen~atlvel WISH TO A
TON. D.C. METROPOUTAN AREA.
. ,
10.0. COUNSESND
ADDRESS I b;- i
m
T fee\ -&at
6. ISSUES: WHY AN UPGRADE A CHANGE IS REQUESTED AND JUSTIFICATION FOR THE R E o ~ ~ s T
9k ~ r a r s PFB, e ~ c - \ a \ \ y
* ~ h ~ d i d n : h ~ a
has Men a ~ e c ; o o s dRgree6 (ne.9cl.it.J
inva\\lin h &*Ciu.t
\ &cjlneenngSq.
heen d . , S & ~ ~ e > For 3me&in,Cj = did& & a
7. (X ifapplicsblel AN APPLICATION WAS PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED ON IYWYMMQO)
AND THIS FORM IS SUBMITIED TO ADD ADDITIONAL
ISSUES, JUSTIFICATION, OH EVIDENCE.'
0 / 0 I / Oq
I
8. IN SUPPORT OF THIS APPLICATION. THE FOLLOWING ATTACHED OPCUMENTS ARE SUBMITTED AS EVIDENCE: 1Com1r)ue in item 17
.
. .
.
If military docukents or'niedicalrecwdr ire rekvant to your fa&, plwse rend copies.)
.
.
.
I
%ea%&ed Ldk~
9. TYPE OF REVIEW REQUESTED IX onel
CONDUCT A RECOAD REVIEW OF MY DISCHARGE BASED ON MY MILITARY PERSONNEL FILE AND AMY ADDITIONAL POCUMENTAT1ON
SUBMl?TED BY ME. I ANWOR IcounseUrearesenrerive/ WILL NOT APF€AR BEFORE THE
I AND/OR I
WkYllNQl
- -
I AND/OR fCoun~Yr~pre~~ntativel WISH TO APFFAR AT A HEARING AT NO DCPENSE TO THE WERNMENT BEFORE A TRAVELlNO PANEL CLOSEST TO
(enter city end atafel
/NOT#: Thd Navy Oizchsrge Revmw Board does not h v e s traveling penel.1
AT A HEARING AT NO EXPENSE TO THE GOVERNMENT BEFORE THE BOARD IN THE
. . . . . - -.
.- . - - . - ... --
I
I
11. APPLICANT MUST SlOM IN ITEM 13.0. BELOW. If the record in qumsdian 1s that of a &ceased w inmmpotent penon, LEGAL PROOF OF
DEATH OR INCOMPETENCY MUST ACCOMPANY THE APPLICATION. If the application I. d m by other than .rho appGunt, indlcate
the name /print)
SPOUSE
WIDOW ) WIDOWER
NEXT OF KIN
end rehtio~hip by marking a box below.
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE ) OTHER /~peci3/1
r ~ ~ ~ c w u r
r c u . ~ ~ ~
A-
yodel
r
12.8. CURRENT MAILING ADDRESS OF APPLICANT OR PERSON ABOVE
,.- . -. 1-d
wliticeilnn of ~ D Y C ~ P ~ ~
in -dmr)
5 -
------- ------
.
13. CERTIFICATION.
I make the foregoing ststernants, M part of my ddm, with tun knowled* of tha
ponelSer invoked for wiWfu,lly .making a false s-tatnment or claim- (U.S. Code, Title 18, Sections 287
and 1001, povld8 that an mdiv~dual shall be fined under this title or lmpnsoned not mom than 5 years,
or both.)
f i Q V b n & W ~ U ~ ~ ~ ; n ~ r - r i * r . ~ - - ~ c - - 7 1 above)
b. DATE SlNED - REQUIRED
-P..
CASE NUMBER
/Do not writa jn thk spsce,)
FD z@o6-oa/3
C. E-MAIL
d. FAX NU-
IlncIude Area Code)
I
.--------
-a-*1-1-----
,
--------------------
#. ' J i NUMEERILrJdu dr- r d ~ }
---------.
--
PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE ~ B S O L ~ E .
Page 1 of 4 Pages
L14. CONTINUATION OF ITEM 6. ISSUES (If appticabb?)
Rnd &m for M
b a c k i n nu?
mf d
~
~
~
I md
-sy
16. CONTINU&~ION OF ITEM 8, SUPWRllNQ D O C U M E N ~ ~ I ~
eppllcablel
MAIL COMPLETED APPLICATIONS TO APPROPRIATE ADDRESS BELOW.
ARMY
Army Review Boards Agency
Support Division, St. Louis
9700 Paga Avenue
St. Louis, MO 63132-5200
[See hnp:llarba.army.penta~on.mil)
AIR FORCE
Air Force Review Boards Agency
SAFMRBR
5 5 0 4 Street West, Suite 4 0
Randolph AFB. TX 78150-4742
1
N A W AND MARINE CORPS
Naval Council of Personnel Boards
720 Kennon Sweet, S.E.
Room 309 (NDRB)
Washington Navy Yard, DC 203746023
COAST GUARD
U.S. Coast Guard
Commandant (G-WPM)
2100 Second Street, S.W. Room 6500
Washington, DC 20593
I
DD FORM 293. MAR 2004
Page 2 of 4 Pages
January 20,2006
Subject: Correction of military record (DD214)
To Whom It May Concern:
I am writing this letter in regards to having my separation, discharge code and the
narrative reason for separation. I was separated on September 12,2005, since then
I have been in college pursuing a degree in paralegal studies. I have been unable to
obtain a decent job due to my separation code, reentry code, and the narrative
reason for separation. I am 29 years old, and have a husband and son to take care
of, so therefore I can't afford proper counsel.. I am unable to seek any veteran
benefits to help my family and myself since this serious misunderstanding and
injustice. Aad just recently I was sent a letter stating that I have to pay back half
my bonus because my code is JKK, again I know of other people who didli3t have to.
I served over three years of dedicated service in the United States Air Force; I have
participated in several volunteer activities on and off Travis Air Force base. The
only thing I was guilty of was choosing the wrong friends. I am going to enclose the
letter of reprimand and the response to the letter of reprimand I wrote while still on
active duty.
I was tested on and off for a whole year and was always clean of any drugs, I
allowed AF'OSI to take a hair sample from me, and that was clean as well. I had
several witnesses that could have attested that the information that was given about
me was false. My witnesses were never contacted. Also, I know of some other active
duty personnel that were drug into this investigation from the Logistics Readiness
Squadron. Their commander did what I thought mine should have, they were
allowed to stay and finish their term from lack of sufficient evidence. I was hoping I
would have had a chance to go to court martial to prove my innocence but I was
unable to that as well The prosecuting attorney knew they didn't have a case
against me. I hope that you will be able to assist me in this matter, if you need any
more information from me don't hesitate to call or write.
. _.-r _
Respectfull.
.-
--
. .
. .. .
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
60TH CIVIL ENGINEER SQUADRON (AMC)
TRAVIS AFB, CALIFORNIA 94535
FROM: 60 CESfCCQ
SUBJECT: Notification Memorandum
1. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for Misconduct: Dmg
Abuse. The authority for this action is AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.54. If my
recommendation is approved, your service will be characterized as honorable or under honorable
conditions (General) discharge. I am recommending that your service be characterized as an under
honorable conditions (General) discharge.
2. My reasons for this action are: On divers occasions since 1 Jan 03, you have wrongfully used
methamphetamines, "ecstasy," cocaine, and marijuana, in violation of Article 1 12% UCMJ. For
this, you received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR), dated 14 Jul05 (Tab 1, Atch 1).
Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this
recommendation are attached. The commander exercising SPCM jurisdiction or higher authority
will decide whether you will be discharged or retained in the United States Air Force and, if you
are discharged, how your service will be characterized. If you are discharged, you will be ineligible
for reenlistment in the Air Force and any special pay, bonus, or education assistance funds may be
subject to recoupment. The separation authority will make the findings and recommendations
required under 10 U.S.C. Section 2005(g).
3. Other Derogatory Data: Letter of Reprimand (LOR), dated 19 Jul05, for failing to go to your
appointed place of duty at the time prescribed (Tab 1, Atch 2).
4. You have the right to consult counsel. Military legal co!@gj-&-b-~~obtained to assist you. I
have made an appointment for you to consult with the Capk.-. .-. .. .-. .. .-. .j Area Defense
Counsel, 4349
ffer D 've, Nellis AFB, NV 89191, DSN 682-4034; Commercial: (702) 652-
hours. You may consult civilian counsel at your own
4034). on 1 #hq & at 0 qbb
expense.
5. You have the right to submit statements in
separation authority to consider must reach
receive an extension for goodcause shown. I
you want the
6. If you fail to consult counsel or to submit statements in your own behalf, your failure will
constitute a waiver of your right to do so.
7. You have been scheduled for a medical examination. You must report to Force Health
Management (f rmerl Physical Exams),:- --- ----- ----, :USAF Medical Center, at 1330
hours on _ a ~ hJ&P for the examination.
--------------
Any personal information you h i s h in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act of 1974. A copy
'AFI 36-3208 is available for your use at Unit Orderly Room.
9. Execute the attached acknowledgment and return it to me immediately.
.---------------------------------------------.
Squadron Section Commander
Attachments:
1. LOR, 14 Jul05
2. LOR, 19 Jul05
3, OSI ROI
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00125
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withtwithout counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request. MD 20762-70cD I (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used I I I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2006-00125 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00216
AFllQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE L A 3 L NLIMDLK FD-2006-00216 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. A copy of AFI 363208, is available for your use in the 365 TRS Commander's Support Staff. For this misconduct, he received an AF Form 174, Record of Individual Counseling, on 14 Feb 06. a.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00337
3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, ~ ~ ' 2 0 7 6 2 - 7 0 0 2 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2006-00337 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable and to change the reason and authority for the discharge. The applicant's discharge characterization should be changed to Honorable and the reason and authority changed to Expiration of Term of Service under AFI 36-3208, para. Any...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00141A
The supervisors at hand did not offer positive mentoring, but told me the Air Force comes first, and that is the Air Force. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for Misconduct, Minor Disciplinary Infractions. For violating 24-hours quarters authorization, you received a LOR on 31 Mar 99, which was placed in your existing UIF on 13 Apr 99 (Atch 4, Tab 1).
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00333
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INI'l'lAI.) AETC 341, 04 APR 0 5 - Late to details three times. Letter of Admonishment, 28 Sep 04 2, AB Form 3070 (Article 15), 21 Apr 05 3.
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2004-00506
3RD FLOOR AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous editioh will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2004-00506 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH AMN) 1.
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00366
The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of discharge. The misconduct included underage drinking, driving under the influence, late for duty (five times), negativelchallenging attitude at work, failing to maintain proper uniform standards, financial irresponsibility, and failing to obey a lawful order (three times). ...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2007-00011
'The Vacation action for failure to go resulted in a forfeiture of pay. CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. On 23 Mar 05, you showed up for a firing appointment unshaven, As a result, you received a LRtter of Reprimand (LOR) on 24 Mar 04 (Tab 1-2).
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00234
SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW ROARD 1535 COMMAND DR. EE WING. The records indicated the applicant received two nonjudicial punishments under Article 15, UCMJ: (1) dereliction of duty by sleeping on post as a security forces member; by falling asleep while operating a patrol vehicle causing damage to a government vehicle and damage to an aircraft, false official statement; and (2) assault and battery of his active duty spouse, damage to his...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00328
AIR FORCE 1)ISrHARCE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMhlAND DR, El3 WINC, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762.7002 I AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 I (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used I 1 I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NCJMRER FD-2006-00328 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15, three Letters of Reprimand, one Letter of Counseling, four Records of Individual Counseling and Iwo Memorandums...