Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2005-00353
Original file (FD2005-00353.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied 
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD 

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (I,AS'I',  I~IRS'I' MII)I>LE INITIAL) 

I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -  

PERSONAL APPEARANCE 

,,Esmu?gEL 
No 

X 

I 

I 

NAME OF .OllNSl?L  AND ORORCANIZATION 

.......................... 

L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I  

GRADE 

TSCT 

X 

AFSNISSAN 

1  : ............. i 

I - - - - - - - - - - - - - -  

RECORD REVIEW 

ADDRESS AND OH OHGANIZATION  OF COUNSEL 

406 W Pershing Blvd North  Little Rock AR 721 14- 
2146 

VOTE OF TBE BOARD 
-. 

MEMBER SITTING 

HON 

A I 

{,EN 

1  UOTI;;. 

I 

- OTHERr- DCN;"^-~ 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

ISSIJES 

AOI.43 
A01.07 
A01.29 

INDEX NUMBER 

A66.00 

IIEARINC DATE 

CASE NUMBhH 

1 
2 
3 
4 

KxarrcrTs srrBMm@ia TO TJIE  BOA^ 

ORDEK APPOWTWG THE UOAKD 
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCI IARGE 
LEI"I'ER OF NOTIFICATION 
BRIEF OF PERSONNLL FII E 
COUNSEL'S  Rbl  b.ASE TO THE BOAKI) 
ADD1 1 IONAI, FXHIBITS  SUBMI I  TFD AT TIME 01 
PERSONA1  APPEARANCI: 

TAPE Kb,CORDWG OF PERSONAI.  APPEARANCb, I IF 

)  25 Jan 2007 
APPl ICANT'S ISSUE .AND THE BOARD'S  DEClSlON.41. RAlTON4L  ARE DISCUSSED Oh THt ATTACHED AIR  FORCE DISCHARGE REVltW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE 

I 

I  FD-2005-00353 

I 

I 

1 

1 

1 

Case heard in Washington, D.C. 

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal  appearance witwwithout counsel, and the right to submit an 
application to the AFBCMK 

Names and votes will  be made available to the applicant at the applicant's  request. 

550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 
I

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00445

    Original file (FD2005-00445.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ISSUE: Applicant received an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions Discharge (Discharge in Lieu of Court Martial). The DRB felt a general discharge characterization was more appropriate in that applicant's service had been honest and faithful, but that his wrongful use of marijuana outweighed the positive aspects of applicant's military record thus not warranting an upgrade to an honorable discharge. SERVICE CHARACTERIZATION IN THIS CASE: Considering the seriousness of the alleged...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00128

    Original file (BC-2006-00128.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 14 Mar 02, Psychemedics contacted AFOSI, relating that the “March” hair sample tested negative and that there was not enough hair to provide conclusive results. On 16 Apr 02, Psychemedics’ results reported that Cocaine was found to be present at the level of 0.8ng/10mg. She agreed with the Psychemedics scientist that the hair analysis test results could not stand alone, that they were below the cutoff, and the government failed miserably to comply with any aspects of Psychemedics’...

  • AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00023

    Original file (FD01-00023.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DEClSlONAL RATlOh ALE CASE NCMBER FD-01-00023 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable applicant w a s o i l k u d a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Baard_hutdeclined to %e exercise this right. Applicant was discharged for misconduct, drug abuse. -I am requesting the Air Force Discharge Review Board to consider specific issues which in my opinion form a basis for upgrading my administrative discharge from the Air...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0473

    Original file (FD2002-0473.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ON THE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE. ISSUE: The applicant does not contest the discharge; he just wants his discharge upgraded in order to join the Air National Guard. In addition, he received a Verbal Reprimand, three Letter’s of Counseling, and a Letter of Reprimand for disobeying a direct order, being late for work, failure to perform maintenance on an aircraft, financial irresponsibility and failure to file a travel voucher and making a false official...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00016

    Original file (FD2003-00016.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN AMN nha TYPE PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW COUNSEL. CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD03-0016 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. In view of the foregoing findings the board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00476

    Original file (FD2005-00476.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate. The DRB recognized the applicant was 20 years of age when the discharge took place. CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0145

    Original file (FD2002-0145.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE MIMBRE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | py 7903-0145 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. His misconduct included two incidents of missing a mandatory dental appointment, using his government issued travel credit card for unofficial purposes, and 14 months later having failed to pay his government travel card bill in the amount of $2,536.97 that had been due for 5 months. Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2002-0145 DEPARTMENT OF THE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00071

    Original file (FD2006-00071.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Memorandum For Member of the Board - Administrative Discharge Board. To Whom It May Concern: On 26 June 2005, I, then TS& - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I : provided a urine sample in response to a ----------------- Please accept this letter as my request for you to review my involuntary administrative discharge from the Air Force Reserves (Reserves) on 28 September 2005, I am requesting reinstatement in the Reserves due to the number of legal and procedural errors that occurred before and...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00242

    Original file (FD2003-00242.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD03-0242 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. In view of the foregoing findings the board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. During my nine months of technical school, I maintained an "A" average.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00102

    Original file (FD2003-00102.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD03-0102 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. In view of the foregoing findings the board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. (Change Discharge to Honorable) Issue 1: Throughout my Air Force career I have made many choices.