1
I
1
I
I
.....................
NAME O F SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
1 GRADE
1 AMN
1 AFSNRSAN
TYPE GEN
'OWEL
YES
No
X
I
I
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION
ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
MEMBER SITTING
VOTE OF THE BOARD
HON
GEN
1 UOTHC
I OTHER
I
DENY
ISSUES
A94.05
/
INDEX NUMBER
A67.10
HEARING DATE
24 Aug 2006
I CASENUMBER
Case heard in Washington, D.C.
I
I
EXHIBITS SUBMETTED TO THE BOARD
I
I
I
ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
1
2
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3
LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
1 4 1 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
I TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HE
I
I
1
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withlwithout counsel, and the right to submit an
application to the AFBCMR
Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request.
.-.
SAFMRBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742
SECRETARY OF T1IE AIR FORCE PERSOIKEI. COIIKCII.
AIR FORCE DISCIIARC.E REVIEH BOARD
lS3SCOMM.AKD DR. EE HIKG.3RD FI.OOR
ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
(EF-V2)
Previous edition will be used
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER
FD-2005-00457
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise this right.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied.
The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an
inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.
ISSUE:
Issue 1. Applicant contends discharge was inequitable because he was a victim of downsizing and it was too
harsh. The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15, a Vacation, three Letters of Reprimand
(LOR's), two Records of Individual Counseling and twelve squadron letters/Memorandums for Record for
misconduct. Applicant received an Article 15 for failing to obey a lawful order to assist an officer. He was
punished with a suspended reduction in grade to airman, forfeiture of pay and 30 days of extra duty. The
records also indicated a Vacation action on 17 Apr 92. However, the DRB did not consider this infraction
since it occurred after the applicant had already been notified of pending discharge action by his commander.
The three LOR's were as a result of applicant having dishonored checks. The remaining disciplinary
infractions were for sleeping on duty; leaving duty place without authority; failure to pay Open Mess dues
on time; dishonored checks; disarming smoke alarm in dorm room; and failure to follow instructions. The
DRB opined that through these administrative actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to change his
negative behavior. The Board concluded the misconduct was a significant departure from conduct expected
of all military members. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be
appropriate.
Issue 2. The applicant cited his desire to receive the G.I. Bill benefits as justification for upgrade. The
Board was sympathetic to the impact the loss of these benefits was having on the applicant, but this is not a
matter of inequity or impropriety which would warrant an upgrade.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
.---------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
(Former AMN) (HGH A1C)
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl recrd a GEN Disch fr USAF McGuire AFB, NJ on 21
May 92 UP AFR 39-10, para 5-46 (Misconduct - Minor Disciplinary Infractions).
Appeals for Honorable Discharge.
2. BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 28 Jan 70. Enlmt Age: 17 11/12. Disch Age: 22 3/12. Educ: HS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A. A-79, E-63, G-53, M-34. PAFSC: 98150 - Dental Assistant
Specialist. DAS: 18 Sep 90.
b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 21 Jan 88 - 14 Nov 88 (9 months 24 days) (Inactive)
3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Enlisted as AB 15 Nov 88 for 4 yrs. Extended 5 Jul 90 for 11 months.
Svd: 03 Yrs 06 Mo 07 Das, all AMS.
b. Grade Status: Amn - 25 Mar 92 (Vacation of Article 15, 17 Apr 92)
A1C - 15 Mar 90
Amn - Unknown
c. Time Lost: None.
d. Art 15's: (1) 17 Apr 92, Vacation, RAF Upper Heyford, UK - Article
86. You, did, on or about 14 Apr 92, without authority,
go from your appointed place of duty, to wit: building
582, Emergency Room. Reduction to Airman. (No appeal)
(No mitigation)
(2) 25 Mar 92, RAF Upper Heyford, UK - Article 91. You,
C-.-..........-.-.----
ou to be a noncommissioned officer, to assist Maj(Dr.)
! a noncommissioned officer, then known by
--------- -----------
having received a lawful order from TSgt :
,x. ................ .. ,
:through the remainder of the morning, an
C-.-..........-.-.----
order which it was your duty to obey, did, on or about
17 Mar 92, willfully disobey the same. Suspended
reduction to Airman. Forfeiture of $100.00 pay per
month for two months, and 30 days extra duty.
(No appeal) (No mitigation)
I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
------------------
e. Additional: SGQ LTR, 17 APR 92 - Left duty without authority
LOR, 05 MAR 92 - Dishonored check.
JAN 92 - Failure to pay Open Mess dues on time.
MFR, 17 JAN 92 - Sleeping on duty.
SSF LTR, 14 JAN 91 - Dishonored check.
SGQF LTR, 13 JAN 92 - Dishonored check.
SGQF LTR, 06 DEC 91 - Dishonored check.
LOR, 21 NOV 01 - Dishonored check.
NOV 91 - Failure to pay Open Mess dues on time.
SGQF LTR, 13 MAY 91 - Dishonored check.
SGQ LTR, 15 FEB 91 - Failure to pay Open Mess dues on time.
03 FEB 91 - Dishonored check.
RIC, 31 JAN 91 - Disarming smoke alarm in dorm room.
LOR, 22 JAN 91 - Dishonored check.
MFR, 16 JAN 91 - Failure to follow instructions.
RIC, 13 NOV 90 - Leaving duty section without permission,
returning to duty late, and arriving for
Commander's Call 20 minutes late.
SSI LTR, 08 NOV 90 - Dishonored check.
18 Oct 90 - Dishonored check.
f. CM: None.
g. Record of SV: 15 Nov 88 - 14 Jul 90 McConnell AFB
4 (Initial)
15 Jul 90 - 14 Jul 91 RAF Upper Heyford 3 (Annual)
h. Awards & Decs: AFGCM, NDSM, AFTR, AFOUA.
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (04) Yrs (04) Mos (01) Das
TAMS: (03) Yrs (06) Mos (07) Das
4 . BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 18 Nov 05.
(Change Discharge to Honorable)
Issue 1: I believe i (sic) was a victim of "do~nsizing~~;
the punishment i
(sic) received didn't fit the crime. I received an Article 15 for an argument
that turned into an insubordination situation. It caused me to unjustly lose my
G.I. Bill which I paid for.
ATCH
1. DD Form 214.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
20TH TACTICAL FIGHTER WING HOSPITAL (USAFE)
APO NEW YORK 09104-5300 '
REPLY TO
ATTN OF: SGQ
SuaJEcT: L e t t e r of Hotif i o a t l o n
13 A p r i l 1992
................................................
AlC:
L.-....-.-..-.-....-.~....~....~.~....~.~....~.'
I em recommending your d i s c h a r g e from t h e United S t a t e s Air Force f o r Hinor
1.
Diaoiplinery I n f r a c t i o n s . The a u t h o r i t y f o r t h i s a c t i o n is AFR 39-10,
paregraph 5-46.
c h a r a c t e r i z e d a s g e n e r a l o r honorable.
c h a r a c t e r i z e d a s general.
If my recommendation i a approved, your e e r v i c e v i l l be
I em recommending t h a t your s e r v i c e b e
2. Hy reesona f o r t h i e a c t i o n a r e :
a. On 18 October 1998 you v r o t e a check, t o t h e E n l i s t e d Open Mess, i n t h e
amount of 680.00, The check vat3 returned because of i n s u f f i c i e n t funds i n your
bank account.
b. On 9 Hovenber 1990 you rere 40 minutes l a t e back from lunch, and you
reported l a t e t o commanders c a l l . You received e L e t t e r of Couneeling dated 13
November 1990.
c. On 14 November 1990 you iasued a check t o t h e E n l i s t e d Open Hess, i n t h e
amount of 812.00. The check v a s r e t u r n e d because of i n s u f f i c i e n t funds.
d. On 14 December 1990 you Issued a check t o . t h e Audio S t o r e , i n t h e amount
of 67.95. The cheek res r e t u r n e d due t o I n s u f f i c i e n t funds.
e. On 15 December 1990 you v r o t e e cheak t o AAFES,
without having s u f f i c i e n t fund6 i n your account.
i n t h e amount of $11.45,
f . On a r about 11 Jonuery 1991, you moved o u t of your eaaigned dormitory
room without permission. On 16 Januery 1991 you v e r e ordered, by t h e F i r s t
Sergeant, t o r e t u r n .
A memo f o r record vea placed I n your PIF.
g. On diverB o c c a s i o n s you iseued check6 t o v a r i o u s agenciea and f a i l e d t o
maintain e u f f i c i e n t funda i n your account. You r e c e i v e d a L e t t e r of Reprimand
dated 22 January 1991.
h. On 28 January 1991 it was discovered t h e t you had tampered v i t h t h e
amoke alarm i n your dormitory room by t a p i n g down t h e r e a e t button. You
received a L e t t e r of Counseling dated 31 Januery 1991.
Right People. Right Mission., Right Now.
i. On 3 February 1991 you v r o t e a check, i n t h e amount o f 922.66,
without having a u f f i o i e n t fund8 i n your account. On 7 February 1991 your
checking account v a e c l o e e d , and on 11 February 1991 you a t t e n d e d a P e r s o n a l
F i n a n c i a l Management Counseling appointment.
t o AAFES,
j. On o r a b o u t 15 February 1991 you f a i l e d t o pay your NCO Club duea,
8235.50, on time. Your c h a r g e p r i v i l e g e s rere auspended f o r 90 daya.
k. On o r a b o u t 28 October 1991 you v r o t e a check i n t h e amount o f 527.25,
AAFES. You r e c e i v e d a L e t t e r o f Reprimand d a t e d 21 November 1991.
t o
1,
I n November 1991 you , - - - f a i l e d
- - - - - - -
t o pay your KC0 Club dues, 923.20, on time.
You rere c o u n s e l e d by HSgt L-.-......,
; D e n t a l C l i n i c S u p e r i n t e n d e n t .
18. I n J a n u a r y 1992, you f a i l e d t o pay your NCO Club dues, $46.20, on time.
Your c h a r g i n g p r i v i l e g e s were suepended.
n. On o r a b o u t 17 J a n u a r y 1992, you f e l l a s l e e p d u r i n g p a t i e n t t r e a t m e n t .
You rere counseled by your s u p e r v i s o r and it v a s s u g g e e t e d you see a physician.
o. On o r abour 4 March 1992, you had an u n a u t h o r i z e d o v e r d r a f t a t Uerchante
You r e c e i v e d a letter of reprimand from t h e f i r e t
Bank i n t h e amount of $22.69.
s e r g e a n t .
p. On o r a b o u t 18 Harch 1992, you f a i l e d t o o b e l - t h e o r d e r o f TSgt ;---------;
Heneey, your s u p e r v i e o r , t o r e t u r n t o work v i t h D r ;-------,
: You r e c e i v e d and
Article 15, suspended r e d u c t i o n , f o r f e i t u r e of pay and 3 0 d a y s e x t r a duty.
. - - - - - - - - - - I
Copiea of t h e documents t o b e f a r v a r d e d t o t h e s e p a r a t i o n a u t h o r i t y i n s u p p o r t
o f t h i s r e c o n s e n d a t i o n a r e a t t e c h e d . The commander e x e r c i e i n g SPCH jurisdiction
o r a h i g h e r a u t h o r i t y v i l l d e c i d e whether you v i l l be d i s c h a r g e d o r r e t a i n e d i n
t h e A i r Force,
t h e A i r Force.
If you a r e diecharged, you w i l l b e i n e l i g i b l e f o r r e e n l i s t m e n t i n
3. You have t h e r i g h t t o c o n a u l t counsel. H i l i t a r y l e g a l c o u n s e l h a s been
o b t a i n e d t o a a a i s t you. An appointment h a s been made f o r you t o c o n s u l t t h e
Area Defenee Counael: 15 A p r i l 1992, 0830 houra. You may c o n s u l t c i v l l l a n
c o u n s e l a t your own expense.
4. You have t h e r i g h t t o submit s t a t e m e n t s i n your own b e h a l f . Any s t a t e m e n t s
you r a n t t h e s e p a r a t i o n a u t h o r i t y t o c o n s i d e r must r e a c h me NLT COB on t h e t h i r d
vorkdey after you s i g n t h e r e c e i p t f o r t h i s letter, u n l e s s you r e q u e e t end
r e c e i v e e n e x t e n s i o n f o r good c a u s e ahovn.
a u t h o r i t y .
I r i l l f o r v a r d them t o t h e a e p e r e t i o n
5. I f you f a i l t o c o n e u l t c o u n s e l o r t o submit s t a t e n e n t a i n your ovn behalf,
your f a i l u r e v i l l c o n e t i t u t e a waiver of your r i g h t 8 t o d o ao.
6. You have been e c h e d u l e d f o r a medical examination. You must r e p o r t t o t h e
2 0 t h Hediaal Oroup H o s p i t a l P h y s i c a l E x a a i n a t i o n e S e o t i o n , a t 0730 h o u r s on 1 6
A p r i l 1992.
7. Any p e r s o n a l i n f o r m a t i o n you f u r n i e h i n r e b u t t a l is covered by t h e P r i v a c y
A c t Statement a 8 e x p l a i n e d i n AFR 39-10, Attachment 6, A copy of AFR 39-10 i e
a v a i l a b l e f o r your u s e i n t h e o r d e r l y room.
8. Execute t h e a t t a c h e d scknovledgment and r e t u r n it t o me
....... ...................................................
immediately,
AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00085
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-01-00085 I GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. For writing these bad checks, the respondent received nonjudicial punishment under Letter of Reprimand for financial irresponsibility, and restriction to Hill AFB for 30 days. We recommend that you order the respondent's separation from the A i r Force with a general discharge without P & R under AFR 39-10, paragraph 5-47d, for the...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00192
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD I GRADE I AFSN/SSAN TYPE PERSONAL APPEARANCE I I x RECORDREVIEW I MEMBER SITTING I HON I GEN UOTHC I OTHER I DENY A92.21 HEARING DATE 23 Sep 2003 CASE NUMBER FD-2003-00192 Case heard at Washington, D.C. 1 2 3 4 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSOhPiEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHlBlTS SUBMITTED AT TIME...
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00152
- ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE PERSONAL APPEARANCE I 1 07 Dec 2005 APPLICANT'S ISSUE AND TXE BOARD'S DECISKlNAL RATIONAL ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2005-00152 I I Case heard at Washington, D.C. MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used i i AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00042
ISSUE: Applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct--Commission of a Serious Offense Issue 1 : Applicant contends that he was young and immature. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH AlC) 1. I have been out of the United States Air Force for roughly thirteen years, but not a day goes by that I do not think about the good memories, and childish mistakes that I made.
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00362
On 3 Nuv 9 2 , you were i n v i o l a t i o n of AFR 35-10. r e c e i v e d a L e t t e r of C o u n s e l i n g on 6 Nov 92 (Tab 1 - 1 0 ) . You must consult legal counsel before making a daei~ion to waive any of your rights. 23 Aug 9 1 , LOR/UIF; 2 J u l 92, MFR: 22 Sep 9 2 , LOC; 6 Oct 9 2 , LOC; 13 Gct 9 2 , LOR; 16 Oct 9 2 , LOC; 28 Oct 92, LOR/UIF/Control Roster; 2 Nov 9 2 , LOR; 4 Nov 92, MFR; 6 Nov 9 2 , LOC; 12 Nov 92, LOR 2 .
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board,the right to a personal appearance with counsel and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR. ORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. The Board concluded the misconduct described in the applicant’s record warranted the General characterization.
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2002-00153
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD Advise applicant of the decision of the Board. 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB TX 78 150-4742 SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR. EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 872077, JAN 00 ': (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2002-0153 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00385
He was administratively disciplined for failing dorm room inspections, failing to maintain proper standards of personal hygiene and cleanliness, failure to go, and operating a vehicle without insurance or current registration. DD Form 214 APPLICATION FOR THE REVIEW OF DISCHARGE FROM THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES (Piease read Instnrcrions on Pages 3 and 4 BEFORE completing this application.) As a r e s u l t , your v e h i c l e was impounded and you r e c e i v e d a L e t t e r o...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00307
- - - I- / Y ~ ~ M E OF SERVICE MF:RIHYH -- AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD .- - -. 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, M D 20762-70U2 1 -.A AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used 1 I I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE HEVlEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATlONALE I FD-2005-00307 I GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorablc, to change thc reason and authority for the discharge, and to changc the reenlist~nent code. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE...
AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00048
-- Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD FD-01-00048 (Former SRA) 1. d. AFR 39-10, Chapter 4 , para 4- 2 states "Customarily the service of an airman discharged under this provision will be d as under other than honorable conditions.Il SrA s being discharged in lieu of a court-martial because f marijuana in blatant disregard of Air Force policy. If discharged, the respondent should receive an under other than honorable...