Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00257
Original file (FD2004-00257.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
" l NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) 

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD 

/  GRADE 

I  AFSNISSAN 

........................................ 

MEMBER SITTING 

' 

A94.05 

A67.10 

UEARlNC DATE 

12 Oct 2004 

CASE NllMBER 

FD-2004-00257 

Case heard at Washington, D.C 

* ; g ~ $ $ & B ~ ~ - * ~ , ~ @ ~ @ ~ g ~ ~ ;  

., .,,. 2-.. 

::g! 

I 
, ,.  , 

I 
1  I  ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 
z 
- .. 
3 
lll'l,  \ l l , - , s  
1  IWII C  O F  1.1  K > t , k h L l  11.1 

I<  .\r~+.  I.,-II< R I : Y I I  \4'<'1r  I J ! \ ~ I ~ \ I < ~ ~ I .  
- 
.- 

II'I'I 
I F  I 

\ t  
.- 

I 

I 

Lll 

l

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00258

    Original file (FD2005-00258.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I'X 781 50-4742 FROM: SECRETARY O F THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COlJNClL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ' ANOREWS AFB. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr Seymour Johnson AFB, NC on 17 Dec 04 UP AFI 36-3208, para 5.50.2 (Pattern of Misconduct - Conduct Prejudicial to Good Order and Discipline). You did, at or near Seymour Johnson AFB, NC, between on or about 1 Feb 02 and on or about 22 Mar 02, steal a box of aircraft warning streamers, of a value...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00347

    Original file (FD2006-00347.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NAME O F SERVICE MEMBER (I.ASr, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) ......................... '..-..-..-..-..-..-------I TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE SSGT I X RECORD REVIEW AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD 1 AFSNISSAN , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - a NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORCAN17ATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION O F COUNSEL I I MEMBER SITTING ,." (Change Discharge to Honorable, and Change the RE Code, Reason for Discharge) ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF. I f t h e r...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2004-00103

    Original file (FD2004-00103.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    IAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (I.AST, FIRST M1DDI.E INITIAL) GRADE AFSNISSAN AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD PERSONAL APPEARANCE I 1 X I RECORD REVIEW I L..-....-....-..-. If he can provide additional documented information to substantiate an issue, the applicant should consider exercising his right to make a personal appearance before the Board. (Change Discharge to Honorable) ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF.

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00287

    Original file (FD2004-00287.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD X ,. ::>::' I 1 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF XOTIFICATION COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD PERSONAI. q ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r * ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withiwithout counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00242

    Original file (FD2004-00242.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I SAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE IVITI~ZL) I GRADE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD / AFSNISSAN. NAME OFCOLNSEL 4 N D ORORGANIZATION I YES No X - MEMBER SITTING ............................................. lSSUES A95.00 A67.10 I INDEX >UMBER ,ADDRESS I N D ORORGAhlZ4TION OF LOLNSEL VOTE OFTHEBOARD bOTHC OTHER DENY . .- HOW GEN X 1 2 3 4 ORDER APPONTTNG THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW O F DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COLINSEL'S...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00417

    Original file (FD2006-00417.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2006-00417 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge. The Board concluded that characterization of the discharge received by the applicant to be appropriate.

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00020

    Original file (FD2006-00020.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH A1C) 1. Based on the respondent's repeated acts of misconduct as listed in paragraph 3, an honorable discharge is not appropriate. RECOMMENDATION: For the reasons set forth above, I recommend the respondent be discharged from the United States Air Force under AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.49, with a general discharge, without P&R.

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2004-00509

    Original file (FD2004-00509.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    -- - AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2004-00509 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, change the reason and authority for the discharge, and change the reenlistment code. Issue I: ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF. < f ' v l i C f i ' f 5 b. I previously submitted an application on (Enterdate) and I am completing this form in order t o submit additional issues.

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00307

    Original file (FD2006-00307.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIKS'I' MIDDLE INI'I'IAL) CKADE AFSNISSAN AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - a I TYPE GEN 1 Y E S C o L ~ S E ~ n 1 NAME O F COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION PERSONAL APPEARANCE AB I X RECORDREVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORGANI%A'l'ION O F C'CIIINSEI I 1 I MEMBER S I T T I N G I I HON I GEN VOTE OF THE BOARD I UOTHC I OTHER I DENY 1NL)ES NUMBER A66.00 1 CASENUMBER EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD 1 I ORDER...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00073

    Original file (FD2003-00073.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD03-0073 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. In view of the foregoing findings the board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. DAS: 20 Jan 87. b , Prior S v : (1) AFRes 8 Feb 86 - 14 Aug 8 6 ( 6 Months 7 Days) (Inactive).