--
-
8, - .*-
-
I *
1 NAME .OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)
-
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
TYPE HON
rt cQ@&W3?',J NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
I
/
I
I
GRADE
SRA
I RECORDREVIEW
IX
ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
I
I
I
1
I
MEMBER SITTING
I
VOTE OF TIlE BOARD - I- '
--
1 1 I ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 1 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 1 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4
BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE
HEARING DATE
CASE NUMBER
I
03 Feb 2004
A P P U C A W S ISSUE AND T I E BOARD'S DECISIONAL RATIONAL
FD-2003-00522
I
, .
I
Case heard at Washington, D.C.
DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED AIRFORGE DISWARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
I
I
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withtwithout counsel, and the right to
submit an application to the AFBCMR
,---------------------------------------------------------------.----------.------------*--------------
- 4
TO:
I:
I
~
- - - - - - - - - - - -
.
. -
7 - - - - -
..:' . .
V O R S E M E P
. . . ..
,
'
'
I
FROM:
SAFNRBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78 150-4742
,.,/
.
.
,
' ,
1
DATE: 02/04/2004 . .
. -- . .- - ...
SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
1535 COMMAND DQ EE WING, 3RD FLOOR
ANDREWS AFB. MD 20762-7002
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
I
(EF-V2)
Previous edition will be used
I
I
I
I
From:
--mmb
Brunswick, GA 31525
To: SAF/MIBR
550 C Street West Suite 40
Randolph AFB, TX 78150-4742
Subject: APPLICATION FOR THE REVIEW OF DISCHARGE OR
DISMISSAL FROM THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES
Date: 3 October 03
Re: ~
r
u
n
s
% _ .
. ;
w
.
i
c
k
GA. 31525
,
a
ISSUE'
A 1 r
March 2002. The stated narrative reason for his separation was "unsatisfactory
performance". However, a review of his records reveals that he was actually
separated for failure to pass the CDC. Therefore we respectfully request change of
the narrative reason for separation to "Career Development Course (CDC) Failure".
separated from the Air Force on 27
s
ANALYSIS
While it can be argued that not passing the CDC impacted the performance of his
duties, we believe that his records and also extenuating circumstances, which shall
addressed herein, prove differently. After reviewing his records, there were not any
instances therein to corroborate the documented narrative reason for separation was
indeed, unsatisfactory performance.
*
We are especially concerned because use of the term unsatisfactory performance,
could 1ead.some to believe that ~1-as
uncooperative andor unconcerned about his job. None, of these were the case in this
instance. We present this "Issue" in accordance with DD Form 293 set%, on the
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - I : official USAF training records, EPR's, and
facts as represented by AlC!---------
VRE's/URE's. All of the referenced documents indicate that he was a superior
worker who was highly thought of by his superiors and recognized for doing a
superior job.
lazy, incapable of performing,
EPR Evidence
A comprehensive review of his performance records (DD Form 293, Document # 2,
EPR's for 2001 and 2002, attached), disclosed tha-over
was superior in all categories. To continue, his 2002 rating was superior in all
categories except for "complying with training", in which he received a "complies
with most training requirements". Additionally, we present as evidence, Additional
Aircraft
Rater comments from his Feb 2002 EPR, given by MSg
all EPR for 2001
5. You have the right to submit a statement in your own behalf. Any statements you want the
separation authority to consider must reach me by ~&~A.AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2003-00532
Applicant requests that the reason (unsatisfactory performance) for his discharge be changed. The Board concluded the reason for the discharge received by the applicant was appropriate. Now on to some of the issues concerning why I failed to adequately study the CDC's.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00406
WINC.3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 DATE: Y/25/2(Wb AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NIJMBER FD-2005-00406 GENERAL: The applicant appeals to change the reason and authority for discharge. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD ( Former SrA) ( HGH SrA) 1. I will forward any statements to the separation authority.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0334
SIGNATURE OF RECORDER INDEX NUMBER A94.05 A49.00 HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 7 JAN 03 FD2002-0334 Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to mei rs) mL OK APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE ee TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE HEARING AIR FORCE DISCHARGE'RE VIEW BOARD...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00139
The records indicate the applicant was discharged with a General discharge for Unsatisfactory Performance. FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD ——e (Former AMN) (HGH A1C) 1. On 12 Mar 02, you scored a 53 on your second CDC examination, your second CDC failure.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0203
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE ay NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION MEMBERS SITTING AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD AFSN/SSAN X RECORD REVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL ISSUES INDEX NUMBER A94.53 A67.10 HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 03-01-10 FD2002-0203 Case heard at Washington, D.C. submit an application to the AFBCMR. The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge,...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00386
SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: a. Reenlisted as SrA 1 Mar 04 for 4 years. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for failure to progress in on-the-job training according to AFPD 36-32, Military Retirements and Separations, and AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation ofAirmen, under the provisions of paragraph 5.26.3. In addition to military counsel, you have the right to employ civilian counsel.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0369
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAI,) GRADE AFSNISSAN &I A l C TYPE PERSONAL APPEARANCE NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION X RECORD REVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL COUNSEL YES I NO X MEMBERS SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY VOTE OF THE BOARD ISSUES A93.09 JNDEX NlJMlER A49.00 HEARING DATE 26 FEB 03 CASE NUMBER FD2002-0369 X I I EXHIBITS SUBMITITD TO THE BOARD I I 1 2 3 4 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0454
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD AFSN/SSAN NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW Lc) NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBERS SITTING ISSUES INDEX NUMBER Co J EXHIBITS SUBMITIED 10 THE BOARD A94.03 A49.00 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 1 9, | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 | LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE 28 MAR 05 FD2002-0454 COUNSEL’S...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00203
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2006-00203 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. The record indicates the applicant received six Records of Individual Counseling for being late for work--three times, failure to obey direct order, failure to meet standards, and abuse of government vehicle; four Letters of Reprimand for being late for work and failure to go; and an Article 15 for driving under the influence of alcohol and...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00463
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR / Naines and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request. ISSUE: Applicant requests that the reason (unsatisfactory performance) for his discharge be changed and also requested to have his reenlistment code changed to be eligible for reenlistment into the United States Air Force. The commander exercising...