Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0203
Original file (FD2002-0203.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)

 

GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE

 

ay NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION

MEMBERS SITTING

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

AFSN/SSAN

 

X RECORD REVIEW
ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ISSUES INDEX NUMBER
A94.53 A67.10
HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER

      
  

03-01-10 FD2002-0203

 

Case heard at Washington, D.C.

submit an application to the AFBCMR.

SIGNATURE OF REGGR

550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742

 

 

 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2)

  

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board and the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to

 

 

 

 

J | ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 «+| APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE

 

3 «| LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4 | BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE

COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD

 

 

 

 

SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD

1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3°” FLOOR

ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002

 

Previous edition will be used.
CASE NUMBER
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable and to change the reason and
authority for his discharge.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board but declined to
exercise this right.

The attached brief contains avaflable pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied.

The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and
after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any.

Issues. Applicant was discharged for both minor disciplinary infractions and unsatisfactory performance.
He had at least one verbal counseling, three Letters of Counseling, one Letter of Reprimand, and an Article
15. There were also eight other memorandums for record regarding his misconduct, which included
multiple instances of failure to go over a 7-month period, and twice failing his Career Development Course
End-of-Course examination. He was both inattentive at his post as a Security Forces member, and fell
asleep at his post. He had two dress and appearance violations (not in uniform when required to be), and
failed two Quality control evaluations for base entry controller duties. His only Enlisted Performance
Report stated he displayed a languid attitude toward his duties and required intense supervision. At the time
of the discharge, applicant submitted a statement in his own behalf, requesting retention, or in the
alternative, an honorable discharge. The Discharge Review Board (DRB) noted that member was
responsible for his actions of misconduct and was properly held accountable for those. He was counseled
repeatedly and given numerous opportunities to conform his behavior but failed to respond to those
rehabilitative efforts. With regard to the unsatisfactory performance, he was given numerous opportunities
to improve and make satisfactory progress, but failed to do so. No inequity or impropriety was found in
this discharge in the course of the records review.

CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings the board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
FD2002-0203
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD

PARTIAL MEDICAL RECORDS

Saw (Former A1C) (HGH A1C)

1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr USAF 02/04/12 UP AFI 36-3208,
para 5.49 and 5.26.3 (Misconduct ~ Minor Disciplinary Infractions and

Unsatisfactory Performance). Appeals for Honorable Discharge and Change to
Discharge Reason.

2. BACKGROUND:

a. DOB: 79/11/19. Enlmt Age: 20 2/12. Disch Age: 22 4/12. Educ: HS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A. A-46, E-52, G-39, M-34. PAFSC: 3P031 - Security Forces.
DAS: 00/08/24.

b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 00/01/31 ~- 00/03/28 (1 Mo 28 Days) (Inactive).
3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:

a. Enld as AB 00/03/29 for 6 yrs. Svd: 2 Yrs 0 Mo 14 Das, all AMS,

b. Grade Status: Alc - 00/05/12

c. Time Lost: None.

d. Art 15's: (1) 01/09/25, Tyndall AFB, FL - Article 113, You, on or
about 15 Sep 01, being posted as a sentinel at building
486, was found sleeping upon your post. Suspended
reduction to the grade of AMN, forfeiture of $100.00
pay per month for 2 months, 15 days extra duty, anda
reprimand. (No appeal) (No mitigation)

 

E. Additional: MFR, 20 MAR 02 - CDC Failure.
MFR, 18 MAR 02 - Counseling on CDC EOC test.
MFR, 18 MAR 02 - Counseling on CDC EOC test.
MFR, 01 MAR 02 ~- Counseling on CDC EOC failure.
MEMO, 17 JAN 02 - CDC Failure.
LOC, 30 DEC 01 - Failure to go.
MEMO, 27 DEC 01 - Failure to report for an appointment.
MEMO, 12 DEC 01 - Failure to report for an appointment.
MFR, 18 NOV 01 - Late for testing and out of uniform.
VERBAL COUNSELING, 5 SEP O01 - Overdue STAR account.
LOC, 25 JUL 01 - Late for work.
LOC, 20 JUL 01 - Failure to be attentive on post.
LOR, 22 MAY 01 - Failure to go.
FD2002-0203

£. CM: None.

gq. Record of SV: 00/03/29 - 01/10/15 Tyndall AFB 3 (HAF Dir)
(Discharged from Tyndall AFB)

h. Awards & Decs: AFTR, AFOUA.

i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (2) Yrs (2) Mos (12) Das
TAMS: (2) Yrs (0) Mos (14) Das

4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 02/04/28.
(Upgrade Discharge to Honorable and Change Discharge Reason)

NO ISSUES SUBMITTED.

ATCH
None.

02/11/07/cer
FO 206 2- 0203

“DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR EDUCATION AND TRAINING COMMAND

BR 03 we

 

MEMORANDUM FOR 325 FW/CC

FROM: 325 FW/JA

SUBJECT: Legal Review — Administrative Discharge -

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0279

    Original file (FD2002-0279.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    (Change Digcharge to Reason and Authority for Discharge and Separation code (SPD) Issue 1: I understand that I failed to pass my career development course (CDC), however the separation code on my DD 214 is JHJ, Unsatisfactory Job Performance, which I feel misrepresents why I was separated. In this case, the Respondent’s commander has recommended he receive an honorable discharge. 4, Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this recommendation are attached.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00304

    Original file (FD2003-00304.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SIGNATU SAF/MRBR : SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 550 C STREET WESTASUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2003-00304 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The records indicated applicant was habitually late to work or...

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00075

    Original file (FD2005-00075.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WMG, 3RD n O O R ANDREW'S AFB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2005-00075 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. As evidenced by a Letter of Reprimand (LOR), dated 6 Mar 03: You, did, at or near Panama City, Florida, on divers occasions, between on or...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0400

    Original file (FD2002-0400.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes the applicant's discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation, was within the discretion of the discharge authority, and that the applicant received full administrative due process. -has orders, and failed to take responsibility for his actions. As the SPCM convening authority, you may: a. decide the case is without merit and retain' or b. order the case initiated again, extending the...

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0215

    Original file (FD2002-0215.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0215 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable, change the Reason and Authority for discharge and change the RE Code. In addition, he also received three Letters of Reprimand for failure to go, and failure to meet dress and appearance standards, five Letters of Individual Counseling for failure to go (three times), failure to maintain room in inspection order, a Memorandum For Record for...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00222

    Original file (FD2006-00222.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ...............2 RECORD REVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORCANIZATIOY OF COUNSEL VOTE OF THE BOARD HON GEN UOTHC OTHER I DENY I I EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD I I 1 2 3 4 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HE HEARING DATE 1 13 Mar 2007 CASE NUMBER ( FD-2006-00222 I I I I I APPLICANT'S ISSUE AND THE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00148

    Original file (FD2006-00148.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    JRD Fl 0 0 U AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used I I 1 I I AIR FORCE DlSCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASb N l l M R E R FD-ZU,)6-00148 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. 'I'he applicant received an Article 15 for being derelict in the performance of duties by providing alcoholic beverages to someone under the age of 2 1. (Atch...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0346

    Original file (FD2002-0346.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE |p 092-0346 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Basis for Action: The Commander, 78" Fighter Squadron, has recommended that qian alia: separated from the service with a general discharge for failure to progress in on-the- job training (OJT), under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, chapter 5, section E, paragraph 5.26.3. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00156

    Original file (FD2006-00156.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DRB recognized the applicant was 20 years of age when the discharge took place. Appeals for an Honorable Discharge, and to Change the RE Code, Reason and Authority for Discharge. (Change Discharge to Honorable, and Change the RE Code, Reason and Authority for Discharge) ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF.

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00239

    Original file (FD2005-00239.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ISSUE: Applicant received a general discharge for a pattern of misconduct and unsatisfactory performance. Positive In-Service Conduct: Completed Basic Training (Certificate Attached) Completed (Certificate Attached) Information Management Apprentice Course AF Study and Testing Skills (Certificate Attached) Customer Service Provider Course (Certificate Attached) Positive Post-Service Conduct: in State Civil Service Position (Letter of Employment Employment, Certificate, and Character...