NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)
GRADE
AFSNlSSAN
t
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
MEMBER SITTING
u
s
A94.11 7 INDEX NI:MBER A67.90
-- --
I ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
I 1
1 2 / APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3
4
LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE
HEARING DATE
CASE NUMBER
Case heard at Washington, D.C.
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withlwithout counsel, and the right to
submit an application to the AFBCMR.
TO:
SAF/MRBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78 150-4742
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
1
I
(EF-V2)
SECRETARY OF TEE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCRARCE REVIEW BOARD
1535 COMblAWD DR EE H INC. 3RD FLOOR
ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002
Previous edition will be used
1
i
1
I
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER
FD-2003-00521
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise this right.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied.
The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an
inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.
ISSUES: Applicant was discharged for conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline. He had two
Articles 15, both for disobeying a direct order to report to the immunization clinic to receive his anthrax
vaccinations after deploying to the United Arab Emirates (UAE) for an extended temporary duty assignment.
At the time member departed for the deployment, the anthrax vaccination program was on hold; it resumed
while he was in the UAE. Applicant now states his discharge was too harsh because the reasons for his
refusal to take the vaccine were not sufficiently addressed. The Board noted that both medical staff and
legal staff in the deployed location counseled member about the anthrax vaccine program; he was advised of
its affects and given educational information. However, applicant further contends that the information he
received was inadequate, failing to address his concerns, but rather threatening him with the disciplinary
consequences of failing to take the shot. The Board could not verify the content of the deployed location's
anthrax education program, but noted that member's thoughts about the anthrax vaccine program were based
on essentially personal opinion garnered from internet research regarding an alleged unacceptable health
risk. Personal opinion cannot be the basis of questioning the morality or wisdom of a Department of
Defense directive; all military members must obey orders given with a valid military purpose. The anthrax
vaccine program is based on a military readiness obligation, and personal philosophy or unfounded health
concerns do not excuse a military member from obedience. Such a contention has no place in a military
organization grounded in good order and discipline. Therefore the Board concluded applicant's misconduct
was a significant departure from conduct expected of all military members and the Board finds the discharge
proper. No inequity or impropriety was found in this discharge in the course of the records review.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
-*
(Former AB) (HGH A1C)
FD2003-00521
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl recfd a GEN Disch fr Minot AFB, ND on 8 Jan 03 UP
AFI 36-3208, para 5.50.2 i~isconduct - Conduct Prejudicial to Good Order and
Discipline). Appeals fok Honorable Discharge.
2. BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 12 Sep 80. Enlmt Age: 19 0/12. Disch Age: 22 3/12. Educ: HS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A. A-48, E-35, G-46, M-34. PAFSC: 3M051 - Services Journeyman.
DAS: 17 Mar 00.
b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 25 Sep 99 - 16 Nov 99 (1 month 23 days) (Inactive).
3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Enlisted as AB 17 Nov 99 for 4 yrs. Svd: 3 Yrs 1 Mo 23 Das, all AMS.
b. Grade Status: AB - 31 Oct 02 (Article 15, 31 Oct 02)
A1C - 17 Mar 01
A m - 17 May 00
c. Time Lost: None.
d. Art 15's: (1) 31 Oct 02, Minot AFB, ND - Article 90. You, having
received a lawful command from ~ol-
superior commissioned officer, then known by you to be
your superior commissioned officer, to receive the
anthrax vaccination no later than 1600 hours on 26 Oct
02, or words to that effect, did, at A1 Dhafra AB,
United Arab Emirates, on or about 26 Oct 02, willfully
disobey the same. Reduction to AB, and forfeiture of
$339.00 pay. (No appeal) (No mitigation)
your
(2) 25 Oct 02, Minot AFB, ND - Article 90. You, having
received a lawful command from 1LT
your superior commissioned officer, then known by you to
be your superior commissioned officer, to receive the
anthrax vaccination at 1400 hours, 19 Oct 02, or words
to that effect, did, at A1 Dhafra AB, United Arab
Emirates, willfully disobey the same. Suspended
reduction to Airman. Forfeiture of $362.00 pay.
(No appeal) (No mitigation)
e. Additional: None.
f. CM: None.
g. Record of SV: 18 Nov 99 - 16 Jul 01 Minot AFB 3 (Initial)
17 Jul 01 - 01 Jun 02 Minot AFB 4 (CRO)
h. Awards & Decs: AFTR, NDSM, AFOUA W/VALOR, SB.
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (3) Yrs (3) Mos (15) Das
TAMS: (3) Yrs (1) Mos (23) Das
4 . BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 5 Nov 03.
(Change Discharge to Honorable)
ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF.
ATCH
1. Applicant's Issues.
2. Discharge Charaterization.
3. Memorandum For 380 ESVS/CC.
4. Pending Lawsuit on Anthrax Vaccine.
5. Prepared Statement by General Council of Veterans for Integrity and
Government.
6. Letters from Congressmen.
7. The Presidential Candidates Weight In On Federal Medicine: George W. Bush.
8. Recent News on Anthrax Vaccine.
9. Personal Statement.
10. Military and Academic Achievements Attained on Active Duty.
11. Character Statements.
8
r
I
I
- - -.
7. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS (X as applicable) (Please print name and Social Securiy Number on each document.)
I i WILL NOT BE SUBMITTED. PLEASE COMPLETE REVIEW BASED ON AVAIIABLE SERVICE RECORDS.
I
1 x I ARE LISTED BELOW AND A&ATTACHED TO THIS APPl?lCATIDN: ((Continue on a plain sheet of paper if more space is needed.)
I
. - - - : - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
a. DOCUMENT 1 :
Cover Sheet
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
b. DOCUMENT 2:
Written Presentation to Article 15 Proceedings
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
c. DOCUMENT 3:
Response To Administrative Discharge Action
.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8. ISSUES
The Board will consider any issue submitted by you prior to closing the case for deliberation. The Board will also review the case t o
respond in
determine whether there are any issues that provide a basis for upgrading your discharge. However, the Board is not required
writing to issues o f concern t o you unless those issues are listed or incorporated by specific reference below. Carefully read the instntctions
that pertain to Block 8 prior t o completing this part of the application. If you need more space, submit additional issues on an attachment.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
I -Mydisehai-ge was-unjust-because it-was- b a d o n oae iaeideatonly; M y Mditaryreeerd was impeeabkprior-to-my- - -
T e ~ { e f & e m t ~ a x v a & e _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-While-I-was stationed m r s e a s In %teb Arab Emirates the educatiolrFrectivedw theanthraxvaccine was poor and-
-cmrcive.lt was b e d onthe punishments tlratmuld o c d y o u - d e n i e d tIredxaxvaccine.-Thisled mettrdo my - - -
you today .I - - - -
-avn research on the merficalaspectofthevaccine~I-condude to tIrefindingsymrh&-frontof
thae-ectucational-brief?ngsm-
=quested an investigation-ofthe marrdztory briefings to educate sofctiersmhcvacc+
-regards-dTBe mtinaxvaccin~-sh~)uict have happendwnever did.-Iwas tineatened md-tof&by my Area Defense - - -
Corn-cit aiat I could be eacaceraled for5 years-if fmrzct €G be g3ingTaIs-e-statements hrregardsof the-e&ca€ioaI-
- - -
had fac%iai-ihf~iiiiad~n Backing-my -&ecTslcin.- - - - - - - - -
received--r decided to gow~d~-~~th-the-~ve~tiga~on-~-~ceI
- - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
me OTfiCer%-Ch%gEEoftb.e-fithi= W-~zatimFd@am-k-&eUnIted Xrab Kmitafe3-cbnfrBdictEid tli6 ~ ~ C I S
bf my-
- - - - - -
statement-HE stated that the bn%fihgS -did h5ppEnF&~Hfhbuu&-mOfee fh3nnOneeAifZir- ContTadiCfeaaeX StBfFmEiltS- -
fhaf E r e bnneEd with-m-e-&-d coulil-statEXiE fact3 - - - -
- - - - -
themserv>5.-TliG~i fefiSed t6 Call ki fh-6se-AiiihaX fh-LAi-ea D>TenSe-C6ii&51 ifaf6dfhsf fie@ vlewfdidnOt-apply lo my
- - - - -
case. riskea-fb? another EG6s~gaiiion-6n-thees'fatZmmehfS of ih-e-UAE 0-ffitE?SsSwhich-EOntiadiEkdamEe TWO d57i - - -
lafe?l-wGiCshEd k-&ugh-the-diSchhige pI-oce;s.TdiaanOt-eiengkf i-chh&Ei f6 gef ill iGparafionmGdiZarwork &at- - - -
- - - - -
needed 76 be-do%: ThG-AGBifenie Cbunciltbld meethat t&&VA- will dbbGiiwoik &it they ZGurd-nOtg6tlo b>cauk
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
lack of time. At the VA Medical Center, I found out that this process is not standard procedure.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I - A€ fhiSpOiiil1-asked to can in tlie ~ifnesSe~~fiommy~s~~a~on
I
: I HAVE LISTED ADDITIONAL ISSUES AS AN ATTACHMENT TO THlS APPLICATION.
- - - ( : I PREVIOUSLY SUBMrrED AN APPLICATION ON (Enter date)
I AND AM COMPLETING M I S FORM IN ORDER TO SUBMIT ADDITIONAL ISSUES.
1
t ---I
. - - - & - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
9. CERTIFICATION
I make the foregoing statements as part o f my application with full knowledge o f the
statement. (U.S. Code, Tite 78, Section 7007, provides that an individual shall be fined
or both.)
a. DATE (YYYYMMDD)
20040208
ARMY
Army Review Boards Agency
Support Division, St. Louis
ATTN: SFMR-RBR-SL
9700 Page Avenue
St. Louis, MO 631 32-5200
(See http://arba.army.pentagon.mil) : 20374-5023
DD FORM 293, DEC 2000
NAW&MARlNE CORPS
I
)
I
I
I Naval Council of Personnel Boards I
: 720 Kennon Street, S.E.
: Washington Navy Yard, DC
Rm. 309 (NDRB)
I
I
involved for willfully making a false
title or imprisoned not more than 5 years,
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
AIR FORCE
COAST GUARD
I SAF/MIBR
: 550-C Street West, Suite 40
: Randolph AFB, TX 781 50-4742 : Washington, DC 20593-0001
: Commandant (G-WPM)
: 2100 Second Street, S.W.
I I
I
I
I
Page 2 of 4 Pages
' ~EPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE'
HEADQUARTERS sTH BOMB WING (ACC)
MlNOT AIR FORCE BASE, NORTH DAKOTA
MEMORANDUM FOR ~~-^.ll.-F----._.pl-
5 SVS
NOV 2 6 2002
FROIW: 5 SVSICC
SUB.IECT: Letter of Notification - AFI 36-3208, Para 5.50.2
1. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for a pattern of
misconduct, specifically conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline. The authority
for this action is AFPD 36-32, Military Retirements and Separations, 14 Jul 93, and AFI
36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen, 10 Mar 00, Chapter 5, Section H, paragraph
5.50.2. If my recommendation is approved, your discharge will be characterized as
honorable or general. I an1 recommending your service be characterized as general.
2. My reasons for this action are:
a. You, having received a lawful command from Colonel
your superior
commissioned officer, then known by you to be your superior commissioned officer, to
receive the anthrax vaccination no later than 1600 hours on 26 Oct 02, or words to that
effect, did, at Al Dhafra Air Base, United Arab Emirates, on or about 26 Oct 02, willfully
disobey the same. You were punished under Article 15 of the UCMJ on 31 Oct 02 and this
incident was added to your existing Unfavorable Information File (UIF). (Atch 3)
b. You, having received a lawful command from First Lieutenan
your superior commissioned officer, then known by you to be your superior comrrrissioned
officer, to receive the anthrax vaccination at 1400 hours, 19 Oct 02, or words to that effect,
did, at Al Dhafra Air Base, United Arab Emirates, willfully disobey the same. You were
punished under Article 15 of the UCMJ on 25 Oct 02 and an UlF was established. (Atch 4)
3. The Letter of Notification with attachments will be forwarded to the separation
authority in support of this recommendation. The Commander exercising SPCM
jurisdiction (5 BWICC) or a higher authority will decide whether you will be discharged
or retained in the Air Force and if you are discharged, how your service will be
characterized. If you are discharged, you will be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force.
4. You have the right to consult counsel. Military legal counsel has been obtained to
assist you. I have made an appointment for you to consult Cap
Defense Counsel, at 300 Summit Drive, Room 306A, a t m m hours, on Z i ' \ r ~ c ) L ,
2002. You may consult civilian legal counsel at your own expense.
rea
5. You have the right to subrrrit statements on your own behalf. Any statements you
want the separation authority to consider must reach me by f i ~ c x 9 hours, on 33-
2002, unless you request and receive an extension for good cause shown. I will then
send them to the separation authority.
6. If you fail to consult legal counsel or to submit statements in your own behalf, your
failure will constitute a waiver of your right to do so.
7. You have been scheduled for a medical examination. You must report to the 5th
Medical Group Hospital, 10 Missile Avenue, Minot AFB, IVD at
2002 for the examination. You must not drink alcoholic beverages 72 hours prior to the
exam.
hours, on a-&L,d.,
8. Any personal information you furnish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act
Statement of 1974. A copy of AFI 36-3208 is available for your use in the Orderly
Room.
9. Execute the attached acknowledgment and return it to me immediately.
- ---
Commander, 5th Services Squadron
Attachments:
1. Receipt of Letter of Notification
2. Statement of Understanding
3. AF FM 3070, Record of Nonjudicial Punishment Proceedings, 4 Nov 02
4. AF FM 3070, Record of Nonjudicial Punishment Proceedings, 25 Oct 02
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00249
The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15 for willfully disobeying an order and an Article 15 for willfully consuming alcoholic beverages while under the legal age of 2 1. You, who knew of your duties, on or about 3 Mar 02, were derelict in the performance of those duties in that you willfully consumed alcoholic beverages while under the legal age of twenty-one, as it was your duty not to do. In addition to military counsel, you have the right to employ civilian counsel.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00425
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 C O M M ~ N D DR. EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDKEWS AFB, bin 20762-7~02 1 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 1 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used d AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2005-00425 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate. Attachment: Examiner's Brief , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00172
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD BEARING RECORD ------ X NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION PERSONAL APPEARANCE AB RECORD REVIEW C.-.-..-..-...I ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSFL -.-.q.m.--.w rwE GEN $$"~@*~d~~~f%y YES No X MEMBER SITTING 1 I ORDER APPOINTTNG THE BOARD 2 1 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 1 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 1 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE 4 COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDI'I'IONAL EXHIBITS SUBMI'II'EL) AT TIME...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00270
TO: SAFIMRBK 550 C STREET WEST, Slll'fE 40 RANDOLPH AFH, TX 78 150-4742 FROhl: SECRETARY O F TllF AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, RE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2005-00270 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. APPLICATION FOR THE REVIEW OF DISCHARGE FROM THE ARMED...
AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00046
The records indicated the applicant received two Article 15s and a Vacation of Suspended Non-Judicial Punishment for failing to obey two separate lawful orders by wrongfully refusing to receive the Anthrax vaccination. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD FD-01-00046 (Former AB) 1. I reviewed the attached administrative discharge package FR2 14-23-6 189,28th Supply Squadron, and find it legally s supports the 28 SUPS/CC's...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00330
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00032
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD03-0032 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. The records indicated the applicant received two Article 15s for failure to obey a lawful command to take the Anthrax vaccination. (Appeal/Denied) (No mitigation) (2) 23 Jan 01, RAF Lakenheath, UK ~ Article 90.
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2003-00369
At the time the applicant violated the order to obtain the anthrax vaccine he was aware that another officer fiom Dover AFB who had previously refused to take the anthrax vaccine received nonjudicial punishment and a general discharge. Memorandum, Air Force Implementation of the Anthrax Vaccine Immunization (AVIP), 28 Jun 02. ~ --r - - I PREVIOUSLY SUBMllTED AN APPLICATION ON (Enter date) AND AM COMPLETING THIS FORM IN ORDER TO SUBMIT ADDITIONAL ISSUES.
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00282
3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASL NUMBER FD-2(,06-00282 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable The applicant requested a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRR) and was scheduled for an appearance on 19 April 2007 at Andrews AFB, MD, but he did not keep the appointment or call to reschedule. The Board finds the...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00397
In view of the foregoing findings, the Board furthcr concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH SRA) 1. In addition to military counsel, you have the right to employ civilian counsel.