YAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)
GRADE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
TYPE
I
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
* I C
I x
RECORD REVIEW
MEMBER SITTING
ISSUES
I I
INDEX NllMRFR
HEARING DATE
19 Aug 2003
CASE NUMBER
Case heard at Washington, D.C.
1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2
APPLICATlON FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
PERSONNEL FILE
I COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
I ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
I PERSONAL APPEARANCE
I TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE
I
I
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withlwithout counsel, and the right to
submit an application to the AFBCMR
TO:
SAFIMRBR (/
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
FROM:
SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
1535 COMhlAND DR, EE WING. 3RD FLOOR
ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002
I
(EF-V2)
Previous edition will be used
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER
FD-2003-00263
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board but declined to exercise
this right.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied.
The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity
or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge
Issues. Applicant was discharged for minor disciplinary infractions. The records indicated the applicant
received two Letters of Reprimand, three Letters of Counseling, a Letter of Admonishment, and three Records
of Individual Counseling. His misconduct included two missed appointments, twice failure to go, failed
dormitory room inspection, breaking traction, driving on an expired license, and lying. Although the Board
noted the medical records included entries for two commander-directed mental health evaluations, they failed
to disclose any cause for applicant's misconduct. These evaluations in fact stated that member was capable of
behaving responsibly although he had an immature personality style that included avoidance of taking
responsibility for his actions. Member had one Airman Performance Report rated an overall "7" which stated
his performance was marginal, he needed constant supervision, and needed to improve his self confidence and
motivation. The DRB opined that through the administrative actions taken, the applicant had ample
opportunities to change his negative behavior and was unable or unwilling to do so. The Board concluded the
misconduct was a departure from conduct expected of all military members, therefore the characterization of
the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate.
Applicant cited his post-service conduct and good citizenship since discharge. However, this evidence is not
relevant to the period of service under review and therefore, does not provide a basis for an upgrade. Although
applicant has matured and his conduct may have improved, this alone is insufficient to overcome the factors
that were the basis for discharge.
If he can provide additional documented information to substantiate an issue, the applicant should consider
exercising his right to make a personal appearance before the Board. If he should choose to exercise his right
to a personal appearance hearing, the applicant should be prepared to provide the DRB with factual evidence
of the inequity and any exemplary post-service accomplishments as well as any contributions to the
community.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings the board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
(Former A1C) (HGH A1C)
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr USAF 9 Nov 88 UP AFR 39-10,
para 5-46 (Misconduct - Minor Disciplinary Infractions). Appeals for Honorable
Discharge.
2. BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 11 Feb 69. Enlmt Age: 18 7/12. Disch Age: 19 8/12. Educ: HS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A. A-29, E-56, G-46, M-69. PAFSC: 46230L - Aircraft Armament Systems
Specialist. DAS: 1 Apr 88.
b. Prior Sv: None.
3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Enlisted as A1C 15 Sep 87 for 4 yrs. Svd: 1 Yrs 1 Mo 26 Das, all AMS.
b. Grade Status: None.
c. Time Lost: None.
d. Art 15's: None.
e. Additional: LOA, 20 OCT 88 - Cited by Security Police for breaking
traction and driving with an expired
license.
LOR, 08 SEP 88 - Failure to attend a scheduled event and
lying.
RIC, 24 AUG 88 - Failed dorm room inspection.
SEG LTR, 01 AUG 88 - Failure to wear seat belt.
RIC, 28 JUN 88 - Missed appointment.
LOR, 17 JUN 88 - Failure to go.
RIC, 06 JUN 88 - Missed appointment.
f. CM: None
g. Record of SV: 15 Sep 87 - 14 Sep 88 Grand Forks AFB 7 (Annual)
(Discharged from Grand Forks AFB)
h. Awards & Decs: AFTR.
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (1) Yrs (1) Mos (26) Das
TAMS: (1) Yrs (1) Mos (26) Das
4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 22 May 03.
(Change Discharge to Honorable)
Issue 1: I would like to update my discharge to honorable due to the
dedication of bettering (sic) myself in knowledge and responsibility, I know my
tour of duty was short and brief, I had alot (sic) of problems with
responsibility and self respect. Over the years i (sic) have gained technical
knowledge and recieved (sic) certifications for my accomplishments.
Currently I hold a position with Verizon Data Services as a Technical Analyst
with growing potential for advancement and stronger knowledgebase (sic) of the
technical industry.
ATCH
None.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
319th Munitions Maintenance Squadron (SAC)
Grand Forks A i r Force Base, N.D.
58205-5000
FROM:
319 MMSICC
SUBJECT: Not i f i c a t i o n L e t t e r
TO:
1 November 1988
1. I am recommending your discharge from t h e Llnited States A i r Force f o r
Minor D i s c i p l i n a r y I n f r a c t i o n s . The a u t h o r i t y f o r t h i s a c t i o n i s AFR 39-10,
paragraph 5-46.
c h a r a c t e r i z e d as honorable o r general. I am recommending t h a t your s e r v i c e be
c h a r a c t e r i zed as general .
2. My reasons f o r t h i s a c t i o n are:
I f my recommendat i o n i s approved, your s e r v i c e w i
l be
l
a. Your missing a scheduled appointment (FTD c l a s s ) as evidenced b y
SAC Fm 845, dated 6 June 1988.
b. Your f a i l i n g t o a t t e n d a scheduled appointment (Change o f Command
Ceremony) as evidenced b y a L e t t e r o f Reprimand dated 17 June 1988.
c. Your m i s s i n g a scheduled appointment (AFRAT) as evidenced b y AF Frn 174,
dated 28 June 1988.
d. Your n o t wearing your seat b e l t s w h i l e o p e r a t i n g a POV on 29 J u l y 1988
as evidenced b y 42ADlSEG l e t t e r , dated 1 August 1988.
e. Your f a i l i n g a d o r m i t o r y i n s p e c t i o n on 19 August 1988 as evidenced b y
AF Fm 174, dated 24 August 1988.
f. Your f a i l u r e t o a t t e n d a scheduled event e x p r e s s l y f o r which you were
released from d u t y on 11 August 1988 as evidenced b y LOR dated 8 September 1988.
h. Your breaking t r a c t i o n i n a POV and d r i v i n g on an e x p i r e d l i c e n s e on
15 October 1988 as evidenced b y LOA dated 20 October 1988.
Copies o f t h e docunents t o be forwarded t o t h e ' s e p a r a t i o n a u t h o r i t y i n
support o f t h i s recommendation are attached. The Commander e x e r c i s i n g SPCM
j u r i s d i c t i o n o r a h i g h e r a u t h o r i t y w i l l decide whether you w i
o r r e t a i n e d i n t h e A i r Force and. i f you a r e discharged, how your s e r v i c e w i
be characterized.
ment i n t h e A i r Force.
l be discharged
l
l
l be i n e l i g i b l e f o r r e e n l i s t -
I f you are discharged, you w i
l
l
3. You have t h e r i g h t t o c o n s u l t counsel. M i l i t a r y l e g a l counsel has been
obtained t o a s s i s t you. I have made an appointment f o r you t o c o n s u l t
Captain T
c o n s u l t c i v i i a n counsel a t y n w aivi; expense.
b u i l d i n g 230, on ! November 1988 a t 1400 hours. You may
a
t
4. You have t h e r i g h t t o submit statements i n your own behalf. Any
statements you want t h e s e p a r a t i o n a u t h o r i t y t o consider must reach me
4 November 1988, unless you request and r e c e i v e an extension f o r good
cause shown. I w i
l send them t o t h e separation a u t h o r i t y .
l
I f you f a i l t o c o n s u l t counsel o r t o submit statements i n your own b e h a l f ,
5.
your f a i l u r e w i
l
l c o n s t i t u t e a waiver o f your r i g h t t o do so.
6. You have been scheduled f o r a medical examination. You must r e p o r t t o
t h e USAF H o s p i t a l , Grand Forks AFB, ND, a t 0700 hours on 2 November 1988 f o r
$.he examination.
7. Any personal i n f o r m a t i o n you f u r n i s h i n r e b u t t a l i s covered b y t h e
P r i v a c y Act Statement as explained i n AFR 39-10, attachment 6.
AFR 39-10
i s a v a i l able f o r your use i n t h e squadron o r d e r l y room.
A copy of
8. Execute t h e attached acknowledgement and r e t u r n i t t o me immediately.
L e t t e r o f Reprimand, 17 Jun
7 Atch
1. SAC Fm 845. 6 Jun 88
2.
88
3. AF Fm 174, 28 Jun 88
4.
5. AF Fm 174, 24 Aug 88
6. U I F l L e t t e r o f Reprimand,
8 Sep 88
7.
L e t t e r o f Admonishment/Armed
Forces T r a f f i c Ticket, 20 Oct 88
42ADlSEG I tr, 12 Aug 88
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00179
Applicant statement to the Air Force Discharge Review Board. The one thing that makes life easier to deal with is my relationship with God. I f you are discharged, you w i l 4.
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2003-00527
Not k~mwing this discharge ~. (Atch 6 ) g. On 12 J u l y 1989, you went from your appointed p l a c e of duty without a u t h o r i t y , a s evidenced by a Record o f I n d i v i d u a l Counseling, dated 12 J u l y 1989. If you a r e discharged, you w i l l be i n e l i g i b l e f o r 3.
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2001-0232
Further, t h e respondent was advised o f the r i g h t s t o a hearing before an a d m i n i s t r a t i v e discharge board, t o consult and be represen- t e d by counsel, t o submit statements i n a d d i t i o n t o o r i n 1 i e u o f board hearing, o r t o waive any o f these r j g h t s . The record o f t h e a d m i n i s t r a t i v e discharge board and t h e case f i l e contain no e r r o r s o r i r r e g u l a r i t i e s p r e j u d i c i a l t o t h e respondent's r i g h t...
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0006
Attachment : Examiner's Brief I DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD FD2 0 02 - 0.0 0 6 (Former AB) (HGH AMN) 1. RECOMMENDATION: Respondent’s misconduct and unwillingness t o conform his H i s service behavior t o Air Force s t a n d a r d s support h i s immediate separation. c. Your duty performance was Substandard, This is evidenced by Letter of Reprimand, by the Commander, dated 5 May 92 (atch c).
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00068
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DQ EE WLNG, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Her infractions included missing numerous appointments with her On-The-Job Training manager, failing to complete her Career Development Course in a timely manner after indicating to her supervisor on numerous occasions that she was progressing...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00444
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withlwithout counsel, and tlie right to submit an application to the AFBCMR Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: a. Enlisted as AB 22 Sep 87 for 4 yrs. (Change Discharge to Honorable) Issue 1: I am requesting that my discharge be upgraded.
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00120
However, based upon the record and evidence provided by applicant, the Board finds the applicant's reason and authority for discharge inequitable. (Change Discharge to Honorable) ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF ATCH 1 . I have requested that temporary identification cards be issued IAW AFR 30-20, paragraph 2-9.
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00137
MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used I I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2004-00137 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. LOC , LOC , LOC , LOR, 25 MAY 90 19 MAY 89 20 APR 89 01 MAR 89 - Late for duty. S u p p o r t i n g Documents a AF Form 3070, s e r v e d 6 Nov 9 0 , w / a t c h b LOR, d a t e d 1 3 J u l 90 w / a t c h c LOC, d a t e d 25 May 90 d LOC, d a t e d 19 May 89 e...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00426
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) G W E AFSNISSAN AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD Texas Veterans Commission 1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 1 ( 2 ( APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 1 3 1 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE ( ( TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE I 1 1 -. On or about 29 November 1988, he failed his room inspection, for which he received...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00338
Appeals for Honorable Discharge, and to Change the RE Code, Reason and Authority for Discharge. APPLICANT DATA (The person whose discharge is to be reviewed). TYPE OF REVIEW REQUESTED [X one) " ,, I CONDUCT A RECORD REVIEW OF MY DISCHARGE BASED ON MY MILITARY PERSONNEL FILE AND ANY ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUBMITTED BY ME.