RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00356
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second term or career
airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the
Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to a code that
would allow him to reenlist.
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was told by his first sergeant that he would be able to join
the Air Force Reserve with the RE code he received.
In support of the applicants appeal, he provides a copy of his
DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active
duty.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
_
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 31 March 2012, the applicant was honorably released from
active duty under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, Completion of
Required Active Service. He served 7 years, 7 months, and
13 days on active duty.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application,
extracted from the applicants military records, are contained
in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air
Force at Exhibit c.
________________________________________________________________
_
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. DPSOA states the applicant was
discharged on 31 March 2012 under the FY12 AF Force Shaping
Rollback Program. The applicants commander non-selected him
for reenlistment on 29 November 2011. The applicant
acknowledged non-selection and rendered his intent not to appeal
the decision on 18 November 2011.
AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the USAF, states commanders have
selective reenlistment selection or non-selection authority.
The Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) considers the members
Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) ratings, Unfavorable
Information from any substantiated source, the airmans
willingness to comply with Air Force standards and/or the
airmans ability (or lack of) to meet required training and duty
performance levels. The applicant does not provide any proof of
an error or injustice in reference to his RE code. Although a
waiver in the applicants case would be up to the individual
components decision and they may not desire a member who was
denied reenlistment, having his RE code changed to circumvent
the selection or waiver process would not be appropriate.
The DPSOA complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 22 March 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was
forwarded to the applicant for review and response within
30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been
received by this office.
________________________________________________________________
_
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. After a
thorough review of the evidence of record, we believe that given
the circumstances surrounding his separation from the Air Force,
the RE code assigned was proper and in compliance with the
appropriate instructions. In addition, the applicant has not
provided any evidence which would lead us to believe that a
change to his RE code to allow him to reenlist is warranted.
Therefore, we agree with the Air Force office of primary
responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our
conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an
error or injustice. In the absence of evidence to the contrary,
we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
________________________________________________________________
_
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
________________________________________________________________
_
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2013-00356 in Executive Session on 17 October 2013,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 18 January 2013, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicants Available Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 5 March 2013.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 22 March 2013.
2
3
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01220
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01220 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the selective reenlistment program (SRP)) and separation program designator (SPD) code of JBK (expiration of term of service) be changed...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02848
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02848 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 2X (first-term, second term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be upgraded so that he can reenlist in the US Marine Corps (USMC). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00845
The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A. His supervisor non-recommended him for the selective reenlistment program and his commander non-selected him for reenlistment on 26 March 2010. As of this date, this office has received no response.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00783
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application extracted from the applicants military personnel records are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate Air Force office of primary responsibility at Exhibit C. ______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 1. AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the USAF, states commanders have selective reenlistment selection or non-selection authority. We took notice of the applicant's complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05892
AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the USAF, states commanders have selective reenlistment selection or nonselection authority. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00657
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00657 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reentry (RE) code of 2X, which denotes "1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the selective reenlistment program (SRP)," be changed to 3K, which denotes Reserved for Use by AFPC or AFBCMR, to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01348
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01348 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 2X, which denotes "1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)," be changed to 1XY [sic] to allow his reentry into the military. On 16...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03451
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. In accordance with AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the USAF, commanders have selective reenlistment selection or non-selection authority. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02787
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02787 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 2X, which denotes "1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the selective reenlistment program (SRP)," be changed to allow his reentry into the military. On 17 Feb 2011, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05487
Block 8b, Station Where Separated, of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect Andrews Air Force Base, Maryland, instead of Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 1. The applicants commander indicated the applicant identified himself as eligible for separation under the DOS Rollback program and it was his intention to deny the applicant reenlistment...