Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00218
Original file (BC-2013-00218.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:			DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00218	

					COUNSEL:  NONE

					HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

1.  Her military retirement pay record be corrected.

2.  The recoupment of her Career Status Bonus (CSB) from her 
military retired pay be waived.  

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

She was medically retired based on disabilities related to 
muscular sclerosis, however, her pay records do not reflect that 
her retirement was a medical retirement.  She is not being paid 
as a 22-year, retired, Master Sergeant.  According to the DoD 
Financial Management Regulation (DoDFMR) 7000.14R, Volume 7A, 
chapter 66, “if a military member is retired due to 
disabilities, the CSB recoupment would be waived.”  

In support of her request the applicant submits a copy of her 
retirement order and an excerpt from DoDFMR 7000.14R, Volume 7A, 
chapter 66.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Based on a copy of her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or 
Discharge from Active Duty, extracted from the Automated 
Personnel Management System (ARMS), the applicant is a former 
Regular Air Force member who served from 23 August 1989 to 
28 September 2011.  Her narrative reason for separation was 
“Retirement Disability, Permanent” with an honorable 
characterization of service.  She was credited with 22 years, 1 
month and 6 days of active duty service.  

The additional relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of 
the Air Force.  Accordingly, there is no need to recite these 
facts in this Record of Proceedings.


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

1.  DFAS-CL states there is no action to be taken.  The 
applicant was placed on the disability retired list pursuant to 
the provisions of 10 U.S.C. § 1201.  A letter received from the 
applicant requesting a retired pay audit, stated that she did 
not have the CSB/REDUX program.  However, they have information 
from her active duty pay records that verifies she did receive a 
CSB entitlement of $30,000, on 23 August 2004.  As she initially 
entered military service after 8 September 1980, she is entitled 
to pay computations based on the average of her highest 36-
months of basic pay received, not the final basic pay received.  

2.  Since the applicant is a disability retiree, the percent 
multiplier used to compute her pay is not reduced as would be 
for a non-disability REDUX retirement.  Her percent multiplier 
is 55.20% which is based on 22 years and 1 month of service.  In 
accordance with the DoDFMR Vol 7A, Chapter 66. 660302 (A)(2), 
“The Secretary of the military department shall waive the 
required refund if the member is separated or retired as a 
result of a physical disability under 10 U.S.C. Chapter 61.”  

3.  There are no monies being recouped from the applicant’s 
military retired pay due to her receipt of the CSB.  However, as 
the applicant did accept the CSB, her retired pay is subject to 
the cost of living adjustment (COLA) less 1%.  Upon reaching age 
62, she will be entitled to a restoration of the reduced COLA, 
and the REDUX computation would be restored to that amount that 
would have been payable had she not taken the CSB.  Future 
COLA's after that time will continue to be reduced by 1%.  

The complete DFAS-CL evaluation is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 3 February 2013 for review and comment within 30 
days (Exhibit D).  To date, a response has not been received.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has 
not been the victim of an error or injustice.  Therefore, we 
find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application 
in Executive Session on 17 October 2013, under the provisions of 
AFI 36-2603:

			, Panel Chair
			, Member
			, Member


The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-00218 was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 7 January 2013, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, DFAS/CL, dated 25 January 2013.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 3 February 2013.



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004406

    Original file (20120004406.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Senator regarding the applicant's SSB recoupment from his military retired pay account. (3) Issue Three: DODFMR, Volume 7B, Chapter 4, subparagraph 040602 B, further states no recoupment of SSB is required, regardless of when paid, if the disability for which the member receives DVA compensation was incurred or aggravated during a period of later active duty. There is no evidence in his records and he did not provide any evidence that shows DFAS has recouped an inappropriate amount of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02332

    Original file (BC-2012-02332.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02332 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be paid the final installment of his Special Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) that would have been paid to him upon medically retiring from the Air Force due to a disability he incurred during a combat zone deployment. DFAS-IN states the separation code used at the time did not authorize payment of the applicant’s...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01570

    Original file (BC 2013 01570.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by DFAS and the Air Force offices of primary responsibility, which are attached at Exhibits C, D, and E. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DFAS recommends relief be granted, indicating that there are competing statutes and implementing directives which prevented the applicant from fulfilling her five-year ADSC. By law, the applicant had to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012752

    Original file (20080012752.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests payment of pay and allowances for her husband, a deceased service member (SM), for the period of 4 October through 14 October 1993. The author of Blackhawk Down relates, "Later that day notification arrived at Fort Bragg Then there were horrible images of a dead Soldier being dragged through the streets Wives and parents and siblings were trying to determine who They finally recognized (the deceased former Soldier) was one of the two crew chiefs ." As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003721

    Original file (20080003721.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of Item 18 (Remarks) on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), to show she received “$61,956.57” instead of “$85,791.43” in Special Separation Benefit (SSB) pay. If a member who has received an SSB payment becomes eligible for retired pay, recoup from the member the gross amount of SSB received, as shown on the member’s DD Form 214 [emphasis added]. The applicant wants the amount of the SSB payment on her DD...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9802844

    Original file (9802844.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The Chief, Retirements Branch, Directorate, Personnel Program Mgmt, AFPC/DPPRR, reviewed this application and states the estimate the applicant received on 2 December 1997 clearly states “the dollar amount shown below is an estimate of your retirement pay.” This document also directs members to “Contact DFAS-CL for official retired pay estimates.” There is no evidence the applicant ever consulted that agency. They produced a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0103025

    Original file (0103025.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-03025 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Date of Initial Entry Military Service (DIEMS)/Date of Initial Entry Uniformed Services (DIEUS) be changed from 17 July 1986 to 5 January 1987. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPAOR...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01275

    Original file (BC-2004-01275.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Since her CSB election form was late and subsequently disapproved, she never came under REDUX but is still under the High-3 retirement plan.] A member must submit the prescribed CSB/REDUX election form and any other required forms as directed in the eligibility notification no later than six months after they received eligibility notification, or the date they reach their 15th year of active service, whichever comes later. If a member does not elect REDUX in the prescribed time, the member...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03795

    Original file (BC-2002-03795.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He further indicated that if she needed the money faster, she should find alternate funds and request a cancellation of the REDUX bonus. On 23 August 2002 applicant elected to accept and receive the High-3/REDUX retirement option, which resulted in her receiving a $30,000 lump-sum bonus upon reaching her 15-year point of active service. Once a member makes an election, the choice is irrevocable as stated on the DD Form 2839, CSB Election, Section IV, #12, “…I understand that once the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009803

    Original file (20110009803.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the date on his DD Form 2839 (Career Status Bonus (CSB) Election) be changed thereby allowing him to receive a CSB. Army Regulation 600-8-7 (Retirement Services Program), Section IV clearly stated that eligible Soldiers have 6 months from the date of notification to decide to either remain under the High-3 retirement plan or elect CSB/REDUX [Reduced Retired]; c. the applicant was informed that if the date of election on his form was correct, his election was past the...