RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
____________________
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02479
COUNSEL: NO
HEARING DESIRED: NO
IN THE MATTER OF:
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her date of rank (DOR) to captain (O-3) be corrected.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The Air Force Reserve promotion cycle delayed her promotion to
captain to 1 October 2008, separating her from her 2004 peer
group, and pushing her promotion consideration to the grade of
major (O-4) from Calendar Year (CY) 2013 to CY 2014.
The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving in the Air Force Reserve in
the grade of captain. She transferred from active duty to a
Reserve assignment as a first lieutenant (O-2) effective
2 August 2007.
She was considered for Reserve promotion on 1 April 2008, the
earliest opportunity following her assignment. She was promoted
to the grade of captain with a DOR of 1 October 2008.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
ARPC/CV recommends denial. CV states that while the applicant
met the DOR criteria for the Fiscal Year 2008 Reserve of the Air
Force Captain Promotion Procedure held on 1 May 2007, she was on
active duty on the adjourning date and not a Reserve asset.
Therefore, she was not eligible to be considered by this Reserve
promotion board.
When the applicant left active duty, she also left her active
duty year/peer group. Her Reserve peers are captains with a DOR
between 1 October 2008 and 30 September 2009.
The complete CV evaluation is at Exhibit B.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 7 August 2012 for review and comment within
30 days. As of this date, this office has received no response.
__________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice. We took
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find
no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-02479 in Executive Session on 21 February 2013,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
_____________________, Chair
_____________________, Member
_____________________, Member
2
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-02479 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 10 Apr 12.
Exhibit B. Letter, ARPC/CV, dated 16 Jul 12.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 7 Aug 12.
____________________
Chair
3
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02218
His Date of Rank (DOR) to the grade of captain (Capt, O-3), be changed from 1 Oct 2001 to l Oct 1999. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicants military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ ARPC/CV recommends approval of the applicant's request to correct his DOR to Capt, and denial of...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04739
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04739 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect his date of rank (DOR) to the grade of captain (O-3) as 23 March 2006, rather than 5 January 2004. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPB recommends denial...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02484
A promotion board is the sole recommending authority, and no feedback is provided by the board to explain why a member is not recommended for selection to the next higher grade. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02389
The applicant originally submitted his request for correction of his date of promotion to captain to the AFBCMR on 2 July 2010. Additional relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 1. The applicant was considered but not selected by the CY09 and CY10 Line of the Air Force Major Promotion Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03409
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/PB recommends denial of the applicant's request to remove the CY12 nonselection from her record. Through no fault of the applicant, her record was incomplete at the time she was considered by the selection board in question, in that four of her United States Marine Corps (USMC) evaluations (FitReps) were not...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 00051
While the advisory noted she received proper and fair consideration for promotion, she believes there are not any AD commanders who would award a definitely promote recommendation to an individual whose record lacked career status, nonselections for promotion, intermediate PME, graduate degree, with a history as a Reserve member competing for promotion on AD with other Regular AF officers who are many years her junior by service time, DOR, total service and age. The applicant contends she...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02534
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02534 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her date of rank (DOR) to captain (O-3) be corrected and, if applicable, she be promoted to major (O-4). The applicants record was subsequently considered by three SSBs for promotion to captain with an earlier promotion effective date. We took note...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04236
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04236 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be allowed sufficient time to build a competitive record for promotion to colonel (O-6). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was recently promoted to the grade of lieutenant colonel (Lt Col)...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01894
According to Reserve Order BA-249 dated 19 June 2008, the applicant was promoted to the grade of captain with a DOR of 5 July 2008 in the Reserve of the Air Force. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/JAX recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. To obtain relief, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02838
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/PB recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant contends he did not have sufficient time to prepare and be competitive for his major selection board. The applicant contends...