Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02413
Original file (BC-2012-02413.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02413 
COUNSEL:  NONE 
HEARING DESIRED:  YES 

IN THE MATTER OF: 
   
   
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 
 
1.  His records be corrected to reflect his service in Vietnam. 
 
2.  His records be corrected to reflect his service in Japan. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
While  stationed  in  Korea  he  went  on  a  temporary  duty  (TDY) 
assignment to Vietnam, Japan and all ports in Korea. 
 
Omissions of his foreign service will harm his future. 
 
The applicant provides no documents in support of his request. 
 
His complete submission is at Exhibit A. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
The  applicant  served  on  active  duty  in  the  Regular  Air  Force 
from 7 Jun 1960 to 3 Mar 1964.  His DD Form 214 reflects 1 year 
and 1 month of Foreign Service. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
AFPC/DPAPP  recommends  denial.    DPAPP  states  they  were  able  to 
verify  and  confirm  the  applicant  was  assigned  to  Kunsan  Air 
Base, Korea from 5 May 1961 through 4 Jun 1962.  However, they 
were unable to confirm service time in Vietnam or Japan.  
 
The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 

 
 

 

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – PRIVACY ACT OF 1974 

2 

 
 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
He  asserts  that  he  traveled  to  various  locations  in  Korea, 
Vietnam  and  Japan.    He  has  been  communicating  with  the 
Department  of  Veterans  Affairs  (DVA)  for  over  15  years  and  it 
appears  no  one  can  find  his  medical  records,  which  include 
information  regarding  his  hearing  loss,  a  knee  injury  and 
hypertension  he  suffered  while  in  the  Air  Force.    He  finally 
located a document which reflects his hearing loss. 
 
His complete response, with attachment, is at Exhibit E. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The  applicant  has  exhausted  all  remedies  provided  by 
existing law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 
 
3.  Insufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has 
not  been  the  victim  of  an  error  or  injustice.    Should  the 
applicant  provide  documentation  that  establishes  he  served  in 
Vietnam or Japan, we would be willing to reconsider his request.  
In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 
 
4.  The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not 
been  shown  that  a  personal  appearance  with  or  without  counsel 
will  materially  add  to  our  understanding  of  the  issue(s) 
involved.  Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably 
considered. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 
 
The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  material  error  or  injustice;  that 
the  application  was  denied  without  a  personal  appearance;  and 
that  the  application  will  only  be  reconsidered  upon  the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 
 
 
 
 

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – PRIVACY ACT OF 1974 

________________________________________________________________ 
 
The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  AFBCMR  BC-2012-
02413 in Executive Session on 24 Jan 2013, under the provisions 
of AFI 36-2603: 
 
     , Panel Chair 
     , Member 
     , Member 
 
The  following  documentary  evidence  was  considered  in  AFBCMR 
BC-2012-02413: 
 
    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 1 June 2012. 
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 24 Jul 2012. 
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 7 Aug 2012. 
    Exhibit E.  Letter, Applicant, undated, w/atch. 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
Panel Chair 

 
 

  
  

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 

3 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05390

    Original file (BC 2013 05390.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05390 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he served in Thailand (administratively corrected) and Vietnam. However, there was no evidence provided or located in the applicant’s personnel records to substantiate he served in Vietnam. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case;...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01279

    Original file (BC-2012-01279.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, it does not reflect the entire time he was TDY in Korea. The applicant’s response to the Air Force evaluation is noted, however, we find no evidence that his records should be corrected to reflect any service time beyond that currently reflected on his DD Form 214. ________________________________________________________________ 3 Panel Chair Member Member The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 13 Sep 2012 and 3 Oct 2012, under...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02504

    Original file (BC-2010-02504.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPAPP states a review of the applicant’s master personnel records and documentation submitted failed to substantiate Foreign Service time in Vietnam. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04846

    Original file (BC-2011-04846.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04846 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be updated to reflect his foreign service. They provided the applicant with a letter verifying foreign service in Japan and in the Republic of Korea, but for only 5...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01157

    Original file (BC-2012-01157.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant served on active duty in the Regular Air Force from 22 Jun 1970 to 30 Nov 1974. The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 20 Jun 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. We took notice of the applicant's...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03203

    Original file (BC 2012 03203.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of the request for service in SEA, stating, in part that although they could verify the applicant was TDY to Korea, based on a lack of evidence, they could not confirm any time served in SEA. The complete AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request for award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). We took notice of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01495

    Original file (BC-2012-01495.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01495 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that he served in a war zone in Korea from 1954 to 1955. On 18 Jul 12, AFPC/DPAPP notified the applicant they were able to confirm his boots on the ground foreign service time at Itazuke Air Base, Japan, from 20 Aug...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02038

    Original file (BC-2012-02038.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VSM is awarded to all members of the United States Armed Forces serving at any time between 4 Jul 1965 and 28 Mar 1973, in the area of eligibility. In addition, the applicant served in Korea for one day and therefore does not meet the basic award criteria for the AFEM as he did not serve for 30 consecutive or 60 non-consecutive days. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2012-02038 in Executive...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01927

    Original file (BC-2010-01927.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01927 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect his foreign service in Vietnam and Korea. The DPAPP complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03850

    Original file (BC-2011-03850.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03850 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Korean Defense Service Medal (KDSM). The DPSIDR complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 6 January 2012, a copy of the Air...