Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01876
Original file (BC-2012-01876.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 

 
 

 

 

 
 

DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-01876 
COUNSEL: NONE 
HEARING DESIRED:  NO 

IN THE MATTER OF:   
     
 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:  
 
Her service points be updated and corrected.   
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
Her  Reserve  Order  D-0270,  dated  30  December  2005,  rendered  for 
her attendance at a formal school for the period 4 January 2006 
through 3 February 2006, was not properly posted to her service 
history.    
 
The  applicant’s  complete  submission,  with  attachments,  is  at 
Exhibit A. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
The  applicant  is  currently  serving  in  the  Air  Force  Reserve  in 
the grade of technical sergeant (E-6).   
 
On  1  June  2012,  ARPC/DPTS,  requested  the  applicant  provide  a 
certified  copy  of  Reserve  Order  D-0270  or  a  Leave  and  Earnings 
Statement (LES) substantiating her participation for the period 
of the orders.   
 
The  remaining  relevant  facts,  extracted  from  the  applicant’s 
military  service  records  are  contained  in  the  evaluation 
provided  by  the  Air  Force  office  of  primary  responsibility  at 
Exhibit C.   
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
ARRC/DPT  recommends  denial.    DPT  states  that  the  Reserve  Order 
the  applicant  provided  does  not  have  a  certifying  official’s 
signature,  nor  does  she  provide  proof  of  payment  (LES)  to 
support her claim of active duty participation.   
 
DPT  indicates  that  if  it  is  the  Board’s  decision  to  grant  the 
relief  sought,  then  the  applicant’s  record  should  be  corrected 
to  award  20  paid  active  duty  points  for  a  school  tour  from 

14 January  2006  to  3  February  2006.    Her  Retention/Retirement 
Year from 30 December 2005 to 29 December 2006 would then show 
69  active  duty  points,  54  inactive  duty  training  points,  15 
correspondence  course  points,  and  15  membership  points  for  a 
total  of  153  total  points  and  a  satisfactory  year  of  service 
towards retirement.    
 
The complete DPT evaluation is at Exhibit C. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
A  copy  of  the  Air  Force  evaluation  was  forwarded  to  the 
applicant  on  10  September  2012  for  review  and  comment  within 
30 days (Exhibit D).  As of this date, this office has received 
no response.  
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The  applicant  has  exhausted  all  remedies  provided  by 
existing law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was timely filed. 
 
3.  Insufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of  the  Air  Force  office  of  primary  responsibility  and  adopt 
their  rationale  as  the  basis  for  our  conclusion  that  the 
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.  If 
the  applicant  were  to  provide  a  copy  of  the  requested  LES  to 
support her claim of active duty participation for the period in 
question, the Board would reconsider her request.  Nevertheless, 
in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 
 
The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  material  error  or  injustice;  that 
the  application  was  denied  without  a  personal  appearance;  and 
that  the  application  will  only  be  reconsidered  upon  the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 

 

2

 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 

    Panel Chair 
    Member 
    Member 

The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  AFBCMR  Docket 
Number  BC-2012-01876  in  Executive  Session  on  15  February  2013, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 

 
The  following  documentary  evidence  was  considered  in  connection 
with AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-01876: 
 

Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 7 May 12, w/atchs. 
Exhibit B.  Letter, ARPC/DPTS, dated 1 Jun 12. 
Exhibit C.  Letter, ARPC/DPT, dated 29 Aug 12. 
Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Sep 12. 

 
 
 
 

 

 
Panel Chair 

3



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00458

    Original file (BC-2013-00458.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00458 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her record be corrected to reflect 52 retirement points for the year 6 Sep 11 - 5 Sep 12 and satisfactory service for the Retirement Year Ending (RYE) 17 Aug 12. DPTS states that the initial audit, prior service record capture, and resulting R/R...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02867

    Original file (BC 2013 02867.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02867 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded points for the period Jul 92 through Apr 95 and that each year be credited as a year of satisfactory service towards retirement. He was not in a point gaining activity nor was he able to earn retirement points during the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01465

    Original file (BC-2012-01465.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01465 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Total Federal Commissioned Service Date (TFCSD) be adjusted to remove all periods assigned to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) and Standby Reserve. On 21 July 1992 she requested separation, which was approved and completed effective 30 September...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00797

    Original file (BC 2013 00797.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Her Retention/Retirement (R/R) Anniversary Date be changed from 29 October 1979 to 21 September 1979 to allow two Inactive Duty Training (IDT) participation points to be moved from her anniversary year ending (AYE) 29 October 1979 to her AYE 29 October 1980. In support of her appeal, the applicant provides copies of her Air National Guard/United States Air Force Reserve (ANG/USAFR) Point Credit Summary, Report on Individual Personnel, and Statement of Service for Naval Reserve Retirement. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04160

    Original file (BC 2013 04160.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    As stated on the point credit summary, the member was instructed to review the summary and report errors within 30 days of receipt. However, the Board is willing to reconsider the applicant’s request should she produce the documentation to verify her participation during the missing dates. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 February 2014.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04010

    Original file (BC-2011-04010.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ ARPC/DPTS recommends denial. To verify and ensure all possible participation was captured and recorded on the AF Form 526, ARPC obtained pay records which correspond exactly to the dates and number of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02511

    Original file (BC 2014 02511.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02511 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her separation date be changed to August 2006 and her grade to be corrected to airman first class (E-3). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03487

    Original file (BC 2014 03487.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03487 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be credited with a satisfactory year of Reserve service for the retention/retirement (R/R) year 17 Jan 11 to 16 Jan 12. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02478

    Original file (BC 2014 02478.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: At the time of her medical retirement, she requested to stay on active duty long enough to complete her final satisfactory service year for a reserve retirement; however, her request was denied. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends denial due to the applicant not completing sufficient participation points required by law to qualify for retirement. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02082

    Original file (BC-2011-02082.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02082 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be credited with four inactive duty training (IDT) points for duty he performed in Feb 10. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR)...