Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04183
Original file (BC-2012-04183.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04183 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

He be allowed to obtain required time in service to be eligible 
for retirement from the Air National Guard (ANG). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He was eligible for retention under the reserve enlisted 
sanctuary law but was improperly counseled concerning regarding 
his “satisfactory points.” 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

According to the applicant’s NGB Form 22, Report of Separation 
and Record of Service, the applicant enlisted in the Air 
National Guard on 5 Jun 99. 

 

On 4 Feb 06, the applicant was honorably discharged at the 
expiration of his term of service with the authority and reason 
for his separation listed as AFI 36-3209, Separation and 
Retirement Procedures for Air National Guard and Air Force 
Reserve Members, paragraph 3.12.1., voluntary separation at the 
expiration of his term of service. He was credited with 
21 years, 7 months, and 14 days of total military service, which 
included 20 years and 14 days of satisfactory reserve service. 
However, according to the applicant’s point credit accounting 
report summary (PCARS), dated 6 Sep 12, he was only credited 
with 18 years of total satisfactory reserve service. 

 

According to 10 U.S.C. Section 1176, a reserve enlisted member 
serving in an active status who is selected to be involuntarily 
separated (other than for physical disability or for cause), or 
whose term of enlistment expires and who is denied reenlistment 
(other than for physical disability or for cause), and who on 


the date on which the member is to discharged or transferred 
from an active status is entitled to be credited with at least18but less than 20 years of service computed under 10 U.S.C.
Section 12732, may not be discharged, denied reenlistment, or 
transferred from an active status without the member’s consentbefore the earlier of the following:

(a)the date on which the member is entitled to be 
credited with 20 years of service computed under section 12732 
of this title; or
(b)If, as of the date on which the member is to bedischarged or transferred from active status, the member has:
(1)at least 18, but less than 19 years of service, 
the thirdanniversary of the date on which the member would 
otherwise be discharged or transferred from an active status; 
or,
(2)at least 19, but less than 20, years of service, 
the second anniversary of the date on which themember would 
otherwise be discharged or transferred from an active status.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of 
primary and isattached at Exhibit C.

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

NGB/A1POrecommends denialindicating there is no evidence theapplicant was refused retention; therefore, he does not qualify 
for sanctuary and must reenlist to be eligible for retirement.
The applicant’s NGB Form 22 indicates he was voluntarily 
separated and is eligible for reenlistment should he meet allapplicable standards. Accordingly, he should contact his local 
ANG recruiter to inquire about eligibility to serve in the ANG.

A complete copy of the NGB/A1POevaluation is at Exhibit C.

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 8Feb13 for review and comment within 30 days. As 
of this date, no response has been received by this office 
(Exhibit D).

2


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. The 
applicant contends he was eligible for retention under the 
reserve enlisted sanctuary law but was improperly counseled 
concerning his “satisfactory points.” After a thorough review 
of the evidence of record and the applicant’s complete 
submission, we believe a preponderance of the evidence supports 
corrective action. In this respect, we note the applicant’s NGB 
Form 22 indicates that he had attained more than 20 years of 
satisfactory service for retirement; however his point credit 
accounting report summary (PCARS) indicates he was only credited 
with 18 years of satisfactory service. Given this obvious 
discrepancy, we find it reasonable to conclude that there was 
some confusion on the part of his unit as to how much service 
the applicant should have been credited with, likely resulting 
in the unit’s decision to not retain him until he had actually 
attained 20 years of satisfactory service for retirement in 
accordance with the provisions of the 10 USC 1176. Therefore, 
we recommend his records be corrected as indicated below. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 

 

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that: 

 

a. He be awarded an additional 31 non-paid inactive duty 
training (IDT) points for the retention/retirement (R/R) year 
20 Jun 86 through 19 Jun 87, resulting in 50 total and 
retirement points and one year of satisfactory Federal service 
for retirement. 


 

b. He be awarded an additional 21 non-paid inactive duty 
training (IDT) points for the retention/retirement (R/R) year 
20 Jun 89 through 19 Jun 90, resulting in 50 total and 
retirement points and one year of satisfactory Federal service 
for retirement. 


 

 c. On 3 February 2006, he applied for transfer to the 
Retired Reserve and his request was approved by competent 
authority, effective 4 February 2006. 

 

 d. On 3 February 2006, he elected to participate in the 
Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) in accordance 
with his subsequently expressed preferences. 


 e. On 4 February 2006, he was transferred to the retired 
reserve. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-04183 in Executive Session on 25 Jun 13, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

All members voted to correct the records as recommended. The 
following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 1 Oct 12, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, NGB/A1PO, dated 10 Jan 13. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 Feb 13. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 

 





Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01200

    Original file (BC-2010-01200.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He contends that he has over 18 years of reserve service and therefore should not have been discharged by the NJANG, but been allowed to complete his service under the provisions of 10 USC 1176(b) which provides sanctuary to reserve enlisted members who have between 18 and 20 years of service. The evidence indicates the applicant applied for and was initially accepted for a warrant officer position with the MDARNG; he was granted a conditional release from the NJANG; and he subsequently...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03132

    Original file (BC-2007-03132.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    His record does not show unsatisfactory service (less than 50 points earned) until Retirement Year Ending (RYE) 18 January 2000. A correction was made, and his record now shows 91 AD points, 20 IDT points, 0 ECI points, 15 membership points, 126 total retirement points, and a year of satisfactory service for RYE 18 January 2002. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022093

    Original file (20120022093.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show he was retained in service under Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1176(b) (10 USC 1176(b)) and allowed to complete 20 years of Reserve service qualifying for retired pay. The applicant provides: * self-authored statement * Enlisted Qualitative Retention Board letter * Order 43-07 * DD Form 256A (Honorable Discharge) * Department of the Army Reserve Personnel (DARP) Form 249-3 (Chronological Record of Military Service) * Point...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011427

    Original file (20130011427.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show he successfully completed 20 years of service qualifying for non-regular retired pay. The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 29 September 1970 * his request for transfer to the ING * his letter to his commander requesting transfer to the ING * commander's request for the applicant's transfer to the ING * Ohio Adjutant General's...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01721

    Original file (BC-2010-01721.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01721 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03439

    Original file (BC-2006-03439.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    A member’s Mandatory Separation Date (MSD) is established from their Total Federal Commissioned Service Date (TFCSD) in accordance with Title 10, United States Code (USC), Section 14507, which requires that a Line-of- the Air Force colonel, not selected for promotion to the grade of brigadier general, be separated not later than the first day of the month following completion of 30-years commissioned service. Although applicant contends he had a break in service from November 1982 to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02819

    Original file (BC 2013 02819.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the applicant did not perform the duty in RYE 3 Nov 09, he performed it in RYE Nov 08. To receive the participation credit he requests he would have been required to perform the duty between 4 Nov 08 and 3 Nov 09. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-02819 in Executive Session on 3 Apr 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2009-03038

    Original file (BC-2009-03038.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of her request, the applicant provides a copy of her original MSD extension request and correspondence related to the matter under review. On 15 Dec 08, NGB/A1POE recommended approval; however, the ANG Chief of Chaplains (NGB/HC) subsequently recommended denial, indicating the applicant’s retention was not in the best interests of the Air Force. However, inasmuch as the Board lacks the authority to reinstate applicants into the ANG, we believe the proper and fitting relief in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002385

    Original file (20090002385.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides a copy of his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record); a copy of his National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service), dated 28 October 1991; and a copy of his NGB Form 23 (Army National Guard Current Annual Statement), dated 8 October 1991, in support of his application. Army Regulation 135-180 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve-Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service), paragraph 2-1a indicates that to be eligible...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00273

    Original file (BC-2010-00273.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The erroneous DD Form 214, documenting a released from active duty date of 30 Sep 07, credits the applicant with more than the requisite 18 years of total active service and would provide a basis for his claims. ARPC records support the conclusion the DD Form 214 was in error and the re-issued form reflects the applicant’s accrued time as 16 years, 4 months, and 6 days of active service. The applicant contends he had attained more than 18 years of total active service, thus qualifying him...