Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02528
Original file (BC-2012-02528.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-02528
		COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his 
dependents.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The option to transfer Post 9/11 education benefits to his 
dependents was not available prior to his retirement.  

He was not adequately informed about options to create 
conditions that would have allowed him to transfer benefits to 
his dependents.  If he were informed, he would have extended his 
service to allow the transfer of Post 9/11 education benefits to 
his dependents.  He meets all qualifications for eligibility and 
was awarded Post 9/11 education benefits for himself.

In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his 
Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) Certificate of Eligibility 
and DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active 
Duty.

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant retired from the Air Force in the grade of colonel 
effective 1 Jul 2004.

Post 9/11 GI Bill:  Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty 
or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted) on or after 1 Aug 
2009, who is eligible for the Post 9/11 GI Bill, and: 

*	Has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces on 
the date of election and agrees to serve four additional 
years in the Armed Forces from the date of election. 

*	Has at least 10 years of service in the Armed Forces 
(active duty and/or selected reserve) on the date of 
election, is precluded by either standard policy (service 
or DoD) or statute from committing to four additional 
years, and agrees to serve for the maximum amount of time 
allowed by such policy or statute, or 

*	Is or becomes retirement eligible during the period from 
1 Aug 2009, through 1 Aug 2013.  A service member is 
considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has 
completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of 
reserve service. 

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial.  DPSIT states the applicant was 
not on active duty on or after 1 Aug 2009, therefore, he is not 
eligible to transfer benefits to his dependents.  The applicant 
provides no evidence of error or injustice on the part of the 
Air Force.

The complete DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit B.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 22 Oct 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded 
to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days.  As of 
this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit 
C).

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not 
been the victim of an error or injustice.  Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-02528 in Executive Session on 8 Jan 2013, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-
2012-02528:

     Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 7 May 2012, w/atchs.
     Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 2 Jul 2012.
     Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 22 Oct 2012.




                                   
                                   Panel Chair
2

2





Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00974

    Original file (BC-2012-00974.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post 9/11 GI Bill: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted) on or after 1 Aug 2009, who is eligible for the Post 9/11 GI Bill, and:  Has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve four additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election. If the Board finds there was an injustice to the extent that the member did not receive adequate pre-separation counseling, as required by law and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01799

    Original file (BC-2012-01799.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01799 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. 2 If the Board finds there was an injustice to the extent that the member did not receive adequate pre-separation counseling, as required by law and DoD regulation, and was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04210

    Original file (BC-2011-04210.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04210 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. In support of his request, the applicant provides a Military Times article, titled “Some Army, Air Force retirees can still get GI Bill transfers.” The applicant's complete...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-05109

    Original file (BC-2011-05109.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPSIT states if the Board finds there was an injustice to the extent that the member did not receive adequate pre-separation counseling, as required by law and DoD regulation, and was not personally notified about the need to transfer while serving in the Armed Forces, the Board may approve the applicant’s request. None of the information he received prior to his retirement provided the specific requirement that transferability had to occur while the member was on active duty. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01350

    Original file (BC-2012-01350.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: After retiring from the Air Force he became aware that he was required to transfer his education benefits to his dependents prior to his retirement. He was not briefed that he had to transfer benefits before retiring. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC- 2012-01350 in Executive Session on 13 Nov 2012, under...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02016

    Original file (BC-2012-02016.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02016 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05012

    Original file (BC-2012-05012.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05012 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) benefits to his dependents. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He had planned on retiring in April 2009;...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03973

    Original file (BC 2013 03973.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03973 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) for transfer of his Post-9/11 GI Bill Educational benefits to his dependents be corrected to 9 Apr 2018 [sic]. Post-9/11 GI Bill: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03752

    Original file (BC 2012 03752.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides no evidence of error or injustice on the part of the Air Force. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 29 Aug 2012.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03571

    Original file (BC-2012-03571.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03571 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits to his dependents while he was on active duty. The program for Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) started 1 Aug 09. On 31 August 2009, he elected to...