RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00401
IN THE MATTER OF:
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reenlistment eligibility status of "Ineligible" be changed
to allow him to enlist in the Air National Guard (ANG).
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was honorably discharged from the Air Force Reserves on
26 Sep 2005, but his reenlistment status reflects “Ineligible.”
When attempting to join the ANG, a recruiter made him aware that
he was ineligible to enlist. He would like to continue to
serve.
The applicant provides no documentation in support of his
request. His complete submission is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant served in the Regular Air Force from 1 Dec
1991 through 10 Dec 1995.
In accordance with DD Form 4/1, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document
- Armed Forces of The United States, on 26 Mar 2003, the
applicant enlisted in the Air Force Reserves for a period of six
years.
In accordance with Reserve Order A-452, dated 12 Sep 2005, under
the authority of AFI 36-3209, Separation and Retirement
Procedures for Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve Members,
the applicant was discharged from the United States Air Force
Reserves
“Unsatisfactory
Participation.” His service was characterized as “General” and
his reenlistment eligibility status was “Ineligible.”
________________________________________________________________
effective
for
26
Sep
2005
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFRC/AIK recommends denial. A1K states the reenlistment
eligibility status of "Ineligible" as reflected on Reserve Order
A-452 is correct based on his separation for unsatisfactory
participation, with a general (under honorable conditions)
characterization of service. Given such, and since he did not
provide any documentation to substantiate an error was made,
there is no basis for correction.
The complete AIK evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 10 Apr 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded
to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. As of
this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit
D).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not
been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
2
Panel Chair
Member
Member
The following members of the Board considered this application
in Executive Session on 23 Aug 2012, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-
2012-00401:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 3 Feb 2012.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFRC/A1K, dated 4 Apr 2012.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBC, dated 10 Apr 2012.
Panel Chair
3
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03805
A1K states that on 13 Jul 2010, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) concluded the overall quality of the applicants service was more accurately reflected by a general (under honorable conditions) character of service. He has not provided any new or relevant evidence that warrants favorable consideration of his request. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03396
________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He should be entitled to a Reserve Officer Affiliation Bonus since his Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) 64PX/Contracting, was listed on the 13 Jan 12, Air Force Reserve Command (AFRC) Fiscal Year 2012 (FY12) Critical Skills Officer Incentive Eligible Skills memo. AFRC/AlKP appears to have interpreted Title 37 USC Section 308j in a manner that allowed them to add a caveat to the Commander's program...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03317
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty; medical records, letters of support, and other various documents associated with his request. Thus none of these conditions are In the Line of Duty (ILOD) as applied to Air Force disability retirement. The complete BCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANTS REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01031
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibits B and C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/SGP recommends denial. The complete SGP evaluation is attached at Exhibit B. AFRC/A1K states that, absent a medical determination from an authoritative medical source validating the medical condition presented by the...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01576
Neither of these periods of time constitutes a break in service, based on applicable Air Force and DoD directives. A1K notes, IAW AFI 36-2604, Service Dates and Dates of Rank, para 4.6 and DoD Financial Management Regulation (DoDFMR) 7000.14-R, Military Pay Policy and Procedures Active Duty and Reserve Pay, an assignment to the Inactive Reserve or Retired Reserve is not considered a break in military service because the member is assigned to a military status and as such, is subject to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05910
________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/A1K recommends denial, stating that the applicant's transfer to the Reserve Retired List (awaiting pay at age 60) effective 1 Sep 04 resulted from him being found medically disqualified for continued military service based on a medical condition that was not service connected. He was later transferred from the Reserve Retired List to the USAF Retired List, effective 14 Nov 09 (age 60) which...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC10-02528
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS On 5 Jun 08, the applicant was furnished a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge for Unsatisfactory Participation, effective 28 May 08, with a Reenlistment eligibility status of “Ineligible.” The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC2010-02528
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS On 5 Jun 08, the applicant was furnished a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge for Unsatisfactory Participation, effective 28 May 08, with a Reenlistment eligibility status of “Ineligible.” The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02528
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS On 5 Jun 08, the applicant was furnished a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge for Unsatisfactory Participation, effective 28 May 08, with a Reenlistment eligibility status of “Ineligible.” The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01434
Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-01434 in Executive Session on 13 Sep 12, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member Exhibit A. DD Form 149,...